A Risk Assessment Model for Voting Systems using Threat Trees and Monte Carlo Simulation

J. Pardue, J. Landry, Alec Yasinsac
{"title":"A Risk Assessment Model for Voting Systems using Threat Trees and Monte Carlo Simulation","authors":"J. Pardue, J. Landry, Alec Yasinsac","doi":"10.1109/RE-VOTE.2009.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There continues to be a requirement for better models, tools, and techniques for conducting risk assessment of voting systems. We propose a model of risk and a technique for risk assessment, which builds on threat trees and Monte Carlo simulation. The goal is to provide a means of facilitating informed decisions regarding voting system security standards through a rational and parsimonious quantification of intuition or estimation of risk. Such a means should support an evaluation of trade-offs, sensitivity analysis, cost-benefit analysis, and estimation of residual risk of current and proposed voting systems, technologies and controls.","PeriodicalId":432365,"journal":{"name":"2009 First International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for e-Voting Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1899-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 First International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for e-Voting Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE-VOTE.2009.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

There continues to be a requirement for better models, tools, and techniques for conducting risk assessment of voting systems. We propose a model of risk and a technique for risk assessment, which builds on threat trees and Monte Carlo simulation. The goal is to provide a means of facilitating informed decisions regarding voting system security standards through a rational and parsimonious quantification of intuition or estimation of risk. Such a means should support an evaluation of trade-offs, sensitivity analysis, cost-benefit analysis, and estimation of residual risk of current and proposed voting systems, technologies and controls.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于威胁树和蒙特卡罗模拟的投票系统风险评估模型
人们仍然需要更好的模型、工具和技术来对投票系统进行风险评估。我们提出了一种基于威胁树和蒙特卡罗模拟的风险模型和风险评估技术。目标是提供一种方法,通过对直觉或风险估计的理性和简约的量化,促进有关投票系统安全标准的明智决策。这种方法应支持权衡评估、敏感性分析、成本效益分析以及对当前和提议的投票系统、技术和控制的剩余风险的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early Requirements for Mechanical Voting Systems Specification of a Voting Service Provider Improving Voting System Event Logs Electronic Elections: Trust Through Engineering Determine the Resilience of Evaluated Internet Voting Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1