Audit Expectation Gap: A Comparative Literature Analysis of Private Sector and Public Sector

A. G. Deepal, A. Jayamaha
{"title":"Audit Expectation Gap: A Comparative Literature Analysis of Private Sector and Public Sector","authors":"A. G. Deepal, A. Jayamaha","doi":"10.4038/wjm.v14i1.7596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Audit Expectation Gap (AEG) issues are steadily expanding around the globe, irrespective of the particular sector involved. A comparative analysis will be more crucial for the AEG literature since the significance of the expectation concerns stems from the concepts of \"stewardship and public accountability\", which are applicable to audits in both private and public sectors. Thus, the purpose of this study is to analyze the similarities and distinctions between the AEG studies conducted pertaining to the private and public sectors. This research is directed by theoretical considerations and arrives at conclusions based on the extant literature. An exhaustive search of the published literature was conducted by applying the search terms “expectation gap” and “audit expectation gap” combined with “public sector”, “government sector” and “performance audit” in the Google Scholar search engine and three databases of Scopus, Jstor, and Emerald were performed separately and independently for each sector from 1970 to 2022. Thus, only the articles published in reputable journals concerning the AEG were selected after applying some selection criteria. It was found that the research contexts, selected target populations, and the dimensions applied to assess AEG were selected after applying some selection criteria. It was found that the research context, selected target populations, and the dimensions applied to assess AEG were found to be significantly different, despite the fact that the definitions and statistical techniques used were found to be comparable in both sectors. This comparison study opens up a wealth of doors for conducting further research in the future.","PeriodicalId":202867,"journal":{"name":"Wayamba Journal of Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wayamba Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/wjm.v14i1.7596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Audit Expectation Gap (AEG) issues are steadily expanding around the globe, irrespective of the particular sector involved. A comparative analysis will be more crucial for the AEG literature since the significance of the expectation concerns stems from the concepts of "stewardship and public accountability", which are applicable to audits in both private and public sectors. Thus, the purpose of this study is to analyze the similarities and distinctions between the AEG studies conducted pertaining to the private and public sectors. This research is directed by theoretical considerations and arrives at conclusions based on the extant literature. An exhaustive search of the published literature was conducted by applying the search terms “expectation gap” and “audit expectation gap” combined with “public sector”, “government sector” and “performance audit” in the Google Scholar search engine and three databases of Scopus, Jstor, and Emerald were performed separately and independently for each sector from 1970 to 2022. Thus, only the articles published in reputable journals concerning the AEG were selected after applying some selection criteria. It was found that the research contexts, selected target populations, and the dimensions applied to assess AEG were selected after applying some selection criteria. It was found that the research context, selected target populations, and the dimensions applied to assess AEG were found to be significantly different, despite the fact that the definitions and statistical techniques used were found to be comparable in both sectors. This comparison study opens up a wealth of doors for conducting further research in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计期望差距:私营部门与公共部门的比较文献分析
审计期望差距(AEG)问题在全球范围内稳步扩大,无论涉及的特定部门如何。对AEG文献进行比较分析将更为重要,因为期望问题的重要性源于“管理和公共责任”的概念,这些概念适用于私营和公共部门的审计。因此,本研究的目的是分析与私营部门和公共部门有关的AEG研究之间的异同。本研究以理论考虑为指导,并在现有文献的基础上得出结论。在Google Scholar搜索引擎中,结合“public sector”、“government sector”和“performance audit”三个关键词,以“expectation gap”和“audit expectations gap”为检索词,对已发表的文献进行了详尽的检索,并分别对1970 - 2022年的各个部门分别进行了Scopus、Jstor和Emerald三个数据库的独立检索。因此,在应用一些选择标准后,只选择发表在知名期刊上的有关AEG的文章。研究发现,研究背景、选择的目标人群和评估AEG的维度是在应用了一定的选择标准后选择的。研究发现,研究背景、选定的目标人群和用于评估AEG的维度存在显著差异,尽管这两个部门使用的定义和统计技术具有可比性。这一比较研究为今后的进一步研究打开了丰富的大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Perceived Barriers to Transition to Entrepreneurship: A Case of Sri Lanka The Impact of Mobile Banking Services on the Customer Satisfaction of Commercial Banks in Sri Lanka Impact of High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Self-Efficacy and Proactive Personality on Employee’s Job Performance: A Conceptual Model Factors Affecting Foreign Direct Investments: Evidence from Sri Lanka Determinants of Self-Efficacy on Undergraduate Academic Achievement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1