Sleights of privacy: framing, disclosures, and the limits of transparency

Idris Adjerid, A. Acquisti, L. Brandimarte, G. Loewenstein
{"title":"Sleights of privacy: framing, disclosures, and the limits of transparency","authors":"Idris Adjerid, A. Acquisti, L. Brandimarte, G. Loewenstein","doi":"10.1145/2501604.2501613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an effort to address persistent consumer privacy concerns, policy makers and the data industry seem to have found common grounds in proposals that aim at making online privacy more \"transparent.\" Such self-regulatory approaches rely on, among other things, providing more and better information to users of Internet services about how their data is used. However, we illustrate in a series of experiments that even simple privacy notices do not consistently impact disclosure behavior, and may in fact be used to nudge individuals to disclose variable amounts of personal information. In a first experiment, we demonstrate that the impact of privacy notices on disclosure is sensitive to relative judgments, even when the objective risks of disclosure actually stay constant. In a second experiment, we show that the impact of privacy notices on disclosure can be muted by introducing simple misdirections that do not alter the objective risk of disclosure. These findings cast doubts on the likelihood of initiatives predicated around notices and transparency to address, by themselves, online privacy concerns.","PeriodicalId":273244,"journal":{"name":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"124","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2501604.2501613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 124

Abstract

In an effort to address persistent consumer privacy concerns, policy makers and the data industry seem to have found common grounds in proposals that aim at making online privacy more "transparent." Such self-regulatory approaches rely on, among other things, providing more and better information to users of Internet services about how their data is used. However, we illustrate in a series of experiments that even simple privacy notices do not consistently impact disclosure behavior, and may in fact be used to nudge individuals to disclose variable amounts of personal information. In a first experiment, we demonstrate that the impact of privacy notices on disclosure is sensitive to relative judgments, even when the objective risks of disclosure actually stay constant. In a second experiment, we show that the impact of privacy notices on disclosure can be muted by introducing simple misdirections that do not alter the objective risk of disclosure. These findings cast doubts on the likelihood of initiatives predicated around notices and transparency to address, by themselves, online privacy concerns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐私的诡计:框架、披露和透明度的限制
为了解决持续存在的消费者隐私问题,政策制定者和数据行业似乎在旨在使在线隐私更加“透明”的提案中找到了共同点。这种自我监管的方法依赖于向互联网服务用户提供更多更好的信息,了解他们的数据是如何被使用的。然而,我们在一系列实验中说明,即使是简单的隐私通知也不会始终如一地影响披露行为,实际上可能被用来推动个人披露可变数量的个人信息。在第一个实验中,我们证明了即使在披露的客观风险实际上保持不变的情况下,隐私通知对披露的影响对相对判断是敏感的。在第二个实验中,我们表明,隐私通知对信息披露的影响可以通过引入简单的误导来减弱,这种误导不会改变信息披露的客观风险。这些发现让人怀疑,以通知和透明度为基础的举措是否有可能自行解决在线隐私问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Is Reporting Worth the Sacrifice of Revealing What I Have Sent?": Privacy Considerations When Reporting on End-to-End Encrypted Platforms Iterative Design of An Accessible Crypto Wallet for Blind Users Fight Fire with Fire: Hacktivists' Take on Social Media Misinformation A Design Space for Effective Privacy Notices On the Memorability of System-generated PINs: Can Chunking Help?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1