CHEGA! A sceptre of the mainstream Portuguese parties' disaggregation or a spectre of fascism?

Carlos Morgado Braz
{"title":"CHEGA! A sceptre of the mainstream Portuguese parties' disaggregation or a spectre of fascism?","authors":"Carlos Morgado Braz","doi":"10.55271/jps000118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past four decades, Portuguese voters have imprinted a solid resistance to the emergence of far-right parties in the political setting. However, this time ended in the 2019 legislative elections when the CHEGA, a self-located party on the far-right spectrum, with a posture assumed as anti-system and unconcerned with the accusations of racism and hate exhilaration, elected André Ventura to the national parliament. Moreover, in the 2021 presidential elections, he got 497,746 votes, a scant point to be the second most-voted candidate. The 2022 legislative elections placed CHEGA as the third most-voted party, and the number of members in parliament has climbed to twelve. This article critically examines the political constraints and opportunities for the rise of the CHEGA party in the Portuguese political setting. It argues that CHEGA emerges from the disintegration of centre-moderate right parties and the interruption of the emancipatory function of the leftist parties coupled with a ubiquitous traditional media landscape, which has proved favourable to the CHEGA propensity towards the Portuguese electorate and without scrutinise its narratives opposing the dominant ruling system. Beyond news media and cumulatively, social networks have also increased party exposure by recruiting affiliates and strengthening support bases.","PeriodicalId":250217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Populism Studies","volume":"9 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Populism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55271/jps000118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past four decades, Portuguese voters have imprinted a solid resistance to the emergence of far-right parties in the political setting. However, this time ended in the 2019 legislative elections when the CHEGA, a self-located party on the far-right spectrum, with a posture assumed as anti-system and unconcerned with the accusations of racism and hate exhilaration, elected André Ventura to the national parliament. Moreover, in the 2021 presidential elections, he got 497,746 votes, a scant point to be the second most-voted candidate. The 2022 legislative elections placed CHEGA as the third most-voted party, and the number of members in parliament has climbed to twelve. This article critically examines the political constraints and opportunities for the rise of the CHEGA party in the Portuguese political setting. It argues that CHEGA emerges from the disintegration of centre-moderate right parties and the interruption of the emancipatory function of the leftist parties coupled with a ubiquitous traditional media landscape, which has proved favourable to the CHEGA propensity towards the Portuguese electorate and without scrutinise its narratives opposing the dominant ruling system. Beyond news media and cumulatively, social networks have also increased party exposure by recruiting affiliates and strengthening support bases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CHEGA !是葡萄牙主流政党解体的权杖,还是法西斯主义的幽灵?
在过去的四十年里,葡萄牙选民对政治环境中出现的极右翼政党表示了坚定的抵制。然而,这段时间在2019年的立法选举中结束了,当时CHEGA是一个极右翼的自我定位政党,以反体制的姿态,不关心种族主义和仇恨兴奋的指控,选举安德烈·文图拉进入国民议会。此外,在2021年的总统选举中,他获得了497746张选票,以微弱的优势成为第二大候选人。在2022年的立法选举中,CHEGA成为第三大得票最多的政党,议会成员人数已攀升至12人。本文批判性地考察了CHEGA党在葡萄牙政治环境中崛起的政治限制和机会。它认为,CHEGA是从中温和右翼政党的解体和左翼政党解放功能的中断中出现的,再加上无处不在的传统媒体景观,这已被证明有利于CHEGA倾向于葡萄牙选民,而没有仔细审查其反对主导统治体系的叙述。除了新闻媒体和累积,社交网络也通过招募附属机构和加强支持基础增加了党的曝光率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Populism’s Building Complex; or: Is there such a thing as Populist Architecture? Government participation and populist discourse transformation of radical left Syriza and radical right Anel The Use of Medical Populism to Claim the Right to Rule in Poland during a Public Health Emergency Time for a change: replacing the populist model with elite theory Crisis and Populism: The role of crisis exploitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1