BUDGETING GAMESMANSHIP IN MANAGERS

Derek-Teshun Huang
{"title":"BUDGETING GAMESMANSHIP IN MANAGERS","authors":"Derek-Teshun Huang","doi":"10.30166/PPMR.200301.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports the findings of research concerning the budgeting gamesmanship of managers in firms operating in all sectors of the economy. Budgeting gamesmanship in this study is defined as the deliberate and premeditated manipulation of the current year's sales, cost, and profit forecasts by managers, and projects an overly conservative image into their budgets. The objectives of this study are: (1) To understand the role of budgeting on performance measurement, (2) To gain an understanding of budgeting gamesmanship behavior, (3) To examine the relationship among organizational factors, asymmetric information problem of budget and budgeting gamesmanship behavior. Based on a judgment sampling approach, samples consisting of 104 firms from manufacturing industry and 51 firms from service industry were selected. Questionnaires were filled out by personally interviewing managers in each firm. The results of this research reveal the following important information: 1. On average, one half of managers in firm sometimes show budgeting gamesmanship behavior in Taiwan. Budgetary gamesmanship behavior was related to the organizational culture and performance measurement system based on budgeting. 2. Over 75% of the firms in Taiwan used the budgeting target as the indicator of performance measurements. 3. Methods to avoid budgeting gamesmanship behavior include: strengthening forecasting ability with quantitative models and making budgeting targets reasonable and attainable. 4. There were no significant relationship between the other organizational factors (such as firm's scale and product complexity, etc.) and budgetary gamesmanship behavior.","PeriodicalId":431367,"journal":{"name":"Pan-Pacific Management Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan-Pacific Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30166/PPMR.200301.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reports the findings of research concerning the budgeting gamesmanship of managers in firms operating in all sectors of the economy. Budgeting gamesmanship in this study is defined as the deliberate and premeditated manipulation of the current year's sales, cost, and profit forecasts by managers, and projects an overly conservative image into their budgets. The objectives of this study are: (1) To understand the role of budgeting on performance measurement, (2) To gain an understanding of budgeting gamesmanship behavior, (3) To examine the relationship among organizational factors, asymmetric information problem of budget and budgeting gamesmanship behavior. Based on a judgment sampling approach, samples consisting of 104 firms from manufacturing industry and 51 firms from service industry were selected. Questionnaires were filled out by personally interviewing managers in each firm. The results of this research reveal the following important information: 1. On average, one half of managers in firm sometimes show budgeting gamesmanship behavior in Taiwan. Budgetary gamesmanship behavior was related to the organizational culture and performance measurement system based on budgeting. 2. Over 75% of the firms in Taiwan used the budgeting target as the indicator of performance measurements. 3. Methods to avoid budgeting gamesmanship behavior include: strengthening forecasting ability with quantitative models and making budgeting targets reasonable and attainable. 4. There were no significant relationship between the other organizational factors (such as firm's scale and product complexity, etc.) and budgetary gamesmanship behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经理们的预算技巧
本文报告了对所有经济部门的企业管理者预算策略的研究结果。在本研究中,预算策略被定义为管理者对当年的销售、成本和利润预测进行蓄意和有预谋的操纵,并将过度保守的形象投射到他们的预算中。本研究的目的是:(1)了解预算对绩效衡量的作用;(2)了解预算博弈行为;(3)考察组织因素、预算信息不对称问题与预算博弈行为之间的关系。采用判断抽样的方法,选取制造业企业104家,服务业企业51家。问卷是通过亲自采访每家公司的经理来填写的。本研究的结果揭示了以下重要信息:1。在台湾,平均有一半的企业经理人有时会表现出预算游戏行为。预算博弈行为与组织文化和基于预算的绩效评估体系有关。2. 超过75%的台湾企业使用预算目标作为绩效衡量指标。3.避免预算博弈行为的方法包括:加强量化模型的预测能力,使预算目标合理、可实现。4. 其他组织因素(如企业规模和产品复杂性等)与预算博弈行为之间没有显著的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact Of Journal Ranking Systems on Emerging Journals and Academic Freedom: How Should Academics Respond? Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Analysis with Dissonance Reduction For Optimistic/Pessimistic Decision Makers The Relationship between Authenticity and the Souvenir Purchase Intent Exploring Anchoring and Communication Effects from Message Manipulation: An Experimental Study about Recycling An Integrated Model of Consumer Involvement Based on Fuzzy Automata
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1