Contemporary Macroeconomic Outcomes: A Tragedy in Three Acts

P. Flaschel, Sigrid Luchtenberg, H. Krämer, Christian R. Proaño, M. Setterfield
{"title":"Contemporary Macroeconomic Outcomes: A Tragedy in Three Acts","authors":"P. Flaschel, Sigrid Luchtenberg, H. Krämer, Christian R. Proaño, M. Setterfield","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3800437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The thesis developed in this paper is that contrary to the claims of its proponents, the main supply-side consequence of neoliberalism was to zap labour, institutionalize worker insecurity, and install an `incomes policy based on fear' in the US economy. Like any successful incomes policy, this diminished confliict over shares of real income and so reduced inflationary pressures - but at the cost of decoupling real wage growth from productivity growth. This last outcome fueled rising income inequality and hollowed out the wage-funded, consumption-led core of the demand-generating process. The demand-side weakness of the neoliberal economy was initially concealed by household borrowing that debt-financed increases in autonomous consumption spending. But it has asserted itself in the wake of the Great Recession, following the exhaustion of the household debt accumulation process. The result was a depressed upswing 2009- 2019 that addressed none of the fundamental structural weaknesses evident in the US economy prior to the Great Recession. The institutionally entrenched but exhausted neoliberal paradigm left the US unprepared for the onset of recession in 2020, and for the larger social and economic travails of the COVID-19 pandemic with which the initial onset of the 2020 recession was associated.","PeriodicalId":127579,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian (Topic)","volume":"219 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3800437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The thesis developed in this paper is that contrary to the claims of its proponents, the main supply-side consequence of neoliberalism was to zap labour, institutionalize worker insecurity, and install an `incomes policy based on fear' in the US economy. Like any successful incomes policy, this diminished confliict over shares of real income and so reduced inflationary pressures - but at the cost of decoupling real wage growth from productivity growth. This last outcome fueled rising income inequality and hollowed out the wage-funded, consumption-led core of the demand-generating process. The demand-side weakness of the neoliberal economy was initially concealed by household borrowing that debt-financed increases in autonomous consumption spending. But it has asserted itself in the wake of the Great Recession, following the exhaustion of the household debt accumulation process. The result was a depressed upswing 2009- 2019 that addressed none of the fundamental structural weaknesses evident in the US economy prior to the Great Recession. The institutionally entrenched but exhausted neoliberal paradigm left the US unprepared for the onset of recession in 2020, and for the larger social and economic travails of the COVID-19 pandemic with which the initial onset of the 2020 recession was associated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代宏观经济结果:三幕悲剧
本文提出的论点与其支持者的主张相反,新自由主义的主要供给面后果是扼杀劳动力,使工人的不安全感制度化,并在美国经济中实施“基于恐惧的收入政策”。与任何成功的收入政策一样,这减少了围绕实际收入份额的冲突,从而降低了通胀压力——但代价是实际工资增长与生产率增长脱钩。最后一种结果加剧了收入不平等的加剧,掏空了由工资支撑、消费主导的需求生成过程的核心。新自由主义经济的需求方面的弱点最初被家庭借贷所掩盖,债务融资增加了自主消费支出。但在大衰退(Great Recession)之后,随着家庭债务积累过程的枯竭,它已经确立了自己的地位。其结果是2009年至2019年的低迷增长,没有解决大衰退前美国经济明显存在的根本结构性弱点。制度上根深蒂固但已耗尽的新自由主义范式,让美国对2020年经济衰退的开始毫无准备,也让美国对新冠肺炎大流行带来的更大的社会和经济阵痛毫无准备。新冠肺炎大流行与2020年经济衰退的开始有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contemporary Macroeconomic Outcomes: A Tragedy in Three Acts The Optimized Monetary Policy ZLB Mandate in NK Behavioural and RE Models Compared A Note Concerning Government Bond Yields Monetary Policy and the Wage Inflation-Unemployment Tradeoff A Quadratic-Cubic Approximation of Optimal Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1