Perbedaan Berpikir Kritis Antara Siswa Yang Diajar Dengan Menggunakan Bahan Ajar LKS Berbasis Model Berpikir Induktif dan Model Induktif Kata Bergambar Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Kelas IV SDM di Kota Bengkulu

Sukarno Sukarno, Salamah Salamah
{"title":"Perbedaan Berpikir Kritis Antara Siswa Yang Diajar Dengan Menggunakan Bahan Ajar LKS Berbasis Model Berpikir Induktif dan Model Induktif Kata Bergambar Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Kelas IV SDM di Kota Bengkulu","authors":"Sukarno Sukarno, Salamah Salamah","doi":"10.29300/mjppm.v3i2.2368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine differences in students' critical thinking by using science-based LKS teaching materials based on inductive thinking models with Inductive Word Pictorial models in class IV SDM II of Bengkulu City, critical thinking differences from groups of students with high initial ability using teaching materials based on science-based LKS inductive thinking with the pictorial word Inductive model in class IV SDM II Bengkulu City, the difference in critical thinking from the group of students with low initial ability by using science teaching material based on inductive thinking models with the Inductive Word Pictorial model in class IV SDM II Bengkulu City, the interaction between learning model and the initial ability to think critically in class IV SDM II Bengkulu City. This study uses a quantitative approach to the type of quasi-experimental research. The subjects of this study were HR II students, totaling 40 students. Data collection was performed using essay tests. The results showed 1) Overall there were differences in students' critical thinking between those taught by using teaching materials for science subjects based on the learning model of inductive thinking and based on the pictorial model of pictorial words. . 2) there is a difference in the critical thinking of students with high initial ability between those taught by using teaching materials for science subjects based on inductive thinking learning models and based on the pictorial model of pictorial words. 3) there is no difference in the critical thinking of students with low initial ability between those taught by using teaching materials based on natural science learning models based on inductive thinking models and based on the pictorial model of pictorial words. students in science subjects at SD Muhammadiyah II Bengkulu city.","PeriodicalId":263410,"journal":{"name":"Manhaj: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manhaj: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29300/mjppm.v3i2.2368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine differences in students' critical thinking by using science-based LKS teaching materials based on inductive thinking models with Inductive Word Pictorial models in class IV SDM II of Bengkulu City, critical thinking differences from groups of students with high initial ability using teaching materials based on science-based LKS inductive thinking with the pictorial word Inductive model in class IV SDM II Bengkulu City, the difference in critical thinking from the group of students with low initial ability by using science teaching material based on inductive thinking models with the Inductive Word Pictorial model in class IV SDM II Bengkulu City, the interaction between learning model and the initial ability to think critically in class IV SDM II Bengkulu City. This study uses a quantitative approach to the type of quasi-experimental research. The subjects of this study were HR II students, totaling 40 students. Data collection was performed using essay tests. The results showed 1) Overall there were differences in students' critical thinking between those taught by using teaching materials for science subjects based on the learning model of inductive thinking and based on the pictorial model of pictorial words. . 2) there is a difference in the critical thinking of students with high initial ability between those taught by using teaching materials for science subjects based on inductive thinking learning models and based on the pictorial model of pictorial words. 3) there is no difference in the critical thinking of students with low initial ability between those taught by using teaching materials based on natural science learning models based on inductive thinking models and based on the pictorial model of pictorial words. students in science subjects at SD Muhammadiyah II Bengkulu city.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在班古鲁的四年级科学四年级选修课上,用基于归纳心态的LKS教材和简写文字教学材料来教授学生的批判性思维差异
本研究旨在确定明古鲁市四班SDM II基于归纳思维模式的科学LKS教材与归纳词图像模型的学生批判性思维差异,以及明古鲁市四班SDM II基于科学LKS归纳思维教材与图形词归纳模型的高初始能力学生群体的批判性思维差异。以归纳式思维模式为基础的科学教材在班四SDM II Bengkulu使用归纳式文字画图模式后与初级能力低的学生群体的批判性思维差异,班四SDM II Bengkulu的学习模式与初级批判性思维能力的互动关系。本研究采用定量方法进行类实验研究。本研究对象为HR II学生,共40名学生。使用论文测试进行数据收集。结果表明:(1)总体而言,基于归纳思维学习模式的理科教材教学与基于图形化词汇学习模式的理科教材教学在学生批判性思维方面存在差异。(2)基于归纳思维学习模式的理科教材教学与基于图形化词汇的图形化学习模式的理科教材教学中,高起点能力学生的批判性思维存在差异。(3)使用基于归纳思维模式的自然科学学习模式的教材教学与使用图形化词汇的图形化模式的教材教学的低初始能力学生的批判性思维没有差异。SD Muhammadiyah II Bengkulu市理科学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Studi Evaluatif Terhadap Program Pembinaan Membaca Al-Qur'an Oleh PUSQIK IAIN Bengkulu Pendampingan Belajar Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Multimodal Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Siswa di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Pendampingan Tahsin Musykilatul Qira’at Imam Hafs dalam Membaca Al-Qur’an Untuk Masyarakat Malang Raya Pendekar (Penderes Badek Karangsari) Program CSR PT Pertamina (Persero) Fuel Terminal Maos Pendampingan Materi Sejarah Lokal Masa Revolisi Fisik Bagi Guru Sejarah SMA Se-Kota Lubuklinggau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1