Policy Forum: Tax, Social Security, and Employment Status - Removing the Distortions in the United Kingdom

J. Freedman
{"title":"Policy Forum: Tax, Social Security, and Employment Status - Removing the Distortions in the United Kingdom","authors":"J. Freedman","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2021.69.2.pf.freedman","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has strained tax and social security systems. Cracks that have existed for some time have been opened up further and are unlikely to close without structural repair. New insights into the shifting nature of work, combined with the development of technologies that can provide modern, practical solutions to old problems, offer the opportunity to rethink the way we tax gig workers and other non-standard providers of labour. This article argues that we need to free ourselves from the employment status classifications developed in other areas of law, for other purposes, when we consider the design of tax and social security provisions. We should aim to harmonize the tax and social security treatment of all those who provide labour as far as is practically possible in order to increase equity and remove distortions. Where that cannot be achieved, despite the benefits of new technologies, dividing lines should be dictated by tax and benefits policy objectives rather than linkages to case law that has evolved in other areas.","PeriodicalId":125977,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Employment","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Employment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2021.69.2.pf.freedman","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has strained tax and social security systems. Cracks that have existed for some time have been opened up further and are unlikely to close without structural repair. New insights into the shifting nature of work, combined with the development of technologies that can provide modern, practical solutions to old problems, offer the opportunity to rethink the way we tax gig workers and other non-standard providers of labour. This article argues that we need to free ourselves from the employment status classifications developed in other areas of law, for other purposes, when we consider the design of tax and social security provisions. We should aim to harmonize the tax and social security treatment of all those who provide labour as far as is practically possible in order to increase equity and remove distortions. Where that cannot be achieved, despite the benefits of new technologies, dividing lines should be dictated by tax and benefits policy objectives rather than linkages to case law that has evolved in other areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策论坛:税收、社会保障和就业状况——消除英国的扭曲
新冠疫情给税收和社会保障体系带来了压力。已经存在了一段时间的裂缝已经进一步扩大,如果不进行结构修复,不太可能关闭。对工作性质变化的新见解,再加上能够为老问题提供现代、实用解决方案的技术发展,让我们有机会重新思考我们对零工和其他非标准劳动力提供者征税的方式。本文认为,当我们考虑设计税收和社会保障条款时,我们需要摆脱在其他法律领域为其他目的而制定的就业地位分类。我们应该力求在实际可能的范围内协调所有提供劳动力的人的税收和社会保障待遇,以便增加公平和消除扭曲。如果不能做到这一点,尽管新技术带来了好处,则应根据税收和福利政策目标来划分界限,而不是与其他领域中形成的判例法的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Relative Disadvantages in College Hinder Female Leadership? Policy Forum: Tax, Social Security, and Employment Status - Removing the Distortions in the United Kingdom Noncompete Clauses, Job Mobility, and Job Quality: Evidence from a Low-Earning Noncompete Ban in Austria Propagation and Amplification of Local Productivity Spillovers A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates under Limited Household Risk Sharing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1