Models to Evaluate of Scientists' Rating

L. H. Vlashchenko, O. Nikitenko
{"title":"Models to Evaluate of Scientists' Rating","authors":"L. H. Vlashchenko, O. Nikitenko","doi":"10.15802/unilib/2019_189791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. This publication purpose is to review the models by which we can evaluate the scientists' ranking. Methods. Two models to estimate scientist rating was described. One model proposes to use data from international scientometric databases to evaluate the scientists rating. Three approaches using to estimate rating was shown. Formula calculations have been developed for two of these approaches. The example of scientist rating calculation according to data from the international scientometric database Scopus is given. Another model proposes to use the TRUST National Higher Education Quality Assurance Portal to estimate the higher school's rating. Results. This allows you to store information about publications and other achievements of the scientist, including full texts, to estimate scientists rating using more factors and to design necessary output forms for later use. Conclusions. The first model can be used to evaluate the scientists rating in a higher education institution using the Web of Science and Scopus science databases at the current time. The second model allows to store information about publications and other achievements of the scientist, including full texts.","PeriodicalId":377077,"journal":{"name":"University Library at a New Stage of Social Communications Development. Conference Proceedings","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Library at a New Stage of Social Communications Development. Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15802/unilib/2019_189791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. This publication purpose is to review the models by which we can evaluate the scientists' ranking. Methods. Two models to estimate scientist rating was described. One model proposes to use data from international scientometric databases to evaluate the scientists rating. Three approaches using to estimate rating was shown. Formula calculations have been developed for two of these approaches. The example of scientist rating calculation according to data from the international scientometric database Scopus is given. Another model proposes to use the TRUST National Higher Education Quality Assurance Portal to estimate the higher school's rating. Results. This allows you to store information about publications and other achievements of the scientist, including full texts, to estimate scientists rating using more factors and to design necessary output forms for later use. Conclusions. The first model can be used to evaluate the scientists rating in a higher education institution using the Web of Science and Scopus science databases at the current time. The second model allows to store information about publications and other achievements of the scientist, including full texts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价科学家等级的模型
目标。这篇文章的目的是回顾我们可以评估科学家排名的模型。方法。描述了两种估计科学家等级的模型。一个模型建议使用来自国际科学计量数据库的数据来评估科学家的评级。给出了评估评级的三种方法。已经为其中两种方法开发了公式计算。给出了基于国际科学计量数据库Scopus数据的科学家等级计算实例。另一种模式建议使用信托国家高等教育质量保证门户网站来估计高等学校的评级。结果。这允许您存储有关该科学家的出版物和其他成就的信息,包括全文,使用更多因素估计科学家的评级,并设计必要的输出表格供以后使用。结论。第一个模型可用于利用Web of Science和Scopus科学数据库评估当前高等教育机构的科学家排名。第二个模型允许存储有关该科学家的出版物和其他成就的信息,包括全文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Contribution of Special Libraries in Promoting Social Inclusion in Indonesia Librarians’ Civic Roles and Responsibilities: Issues in Information Crises and Information Disorders Publications of the Taras Shevchenko Scientific Society as Historical Sources of Research on the Book Heritage of Ukraine Shared Leadership as the Foundation of University Library Management in Crisis Conditions of Martial Law Challenges of Open Science: Problems of Metadata Research and Analysis of Scientometric Indicators of Scientists (Experience of the Scientific Library of Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1