{"title":"The beginnings of a mixed system or, advocates at the Cape during the early nineteenth century 1828-1850 : article","authors":"H. Erasmus","doi":"10.17159/2411-7870/2015/V21N2A1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his study of the judgments of the Supreme Court of the Colony of Good Hope during the late nineteenth century, Reinhard Zimmermann stressed the importance of the role of the Bar. A study of the professional activity of the advocates at the Cape Bar during the early nineteenth century necessitates reconsideration of current assumptions. The Charter of Justice of 1827 required advocates to have been admitted to a United Kingdom Bar or to be doctors of law of Oxford, Cambridge or Dublin.This gave rise to the misconception that from the outset the survival of Roman- Dutch law was under threat, if not from a hostile Bar, at least from one with little knowledge of Roman-Dutch Law. The Charter of Justice also made provision for the admission of persons who had practised as advocates in the former Court of Justiceand from 1803, were required to have graduated in law in Holland. For the first ten years of its existence, only former advocates of the old Court of Justice practisedbefore the Cape Supreme Court, the one exception being the Attorney-General. Perusal of the Menzies' Reports, which cover the years 1828 to 1849, reveals theextent to which advocates relied on Roman-Dutch authority. In every contested civil case old authority is cited, sometimes on an extensive scale. During the fi rst years of the Cape Supreme Court, the advocates played a vital role in affirming the status of Roman-Dutch law as an integral part of the law of the Colony. This continued throughout the nineteenth century. At the Cape during the nineteenth century there was no bellum juridicum between the proponents of Roman-Dutch law and English law. This does not mean that Roman-Dutch law was the only actor on the stage. Ties with Holland had been severed. Roman Dutch-law found application within an English colonial political environment, and the courts operated within a procedural regime of English origin. In the Netherlands, the country of origin of Roman-Dutchlaw, the introduction of a code based on the French Civil Code meant that Roman- Dutch law was no longer a living system. In the circumstances, developments in the field of mercantile law, in particular, were assimilated with reference to English law and through legislation derived from English precedents. Whatever tensions there might have been at times, these various elements were in fact the building blocks of the new mixed system. From the very first years, the advocates, in a pragmatic way, played their part in fashioning a coherent system from these building blocks.","PeriodicalId":338511,"journal":{"name":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2015/V21N2A1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
In his study of the judgments of the Supreme Court of the Colony of Good Hope during the late nineteenth century, Reinhard Zimmermann stressed the importance of the role of the Bar. A study of the professional activity of the advocates at the Cape Bar during the early nineteenth century necessitates reconsideration of current assumptions. The Charter of Justice of 1827 required advocates to have been admitted to a United Kingdom Bar or to be doctors of law of Oxford, Cambridge or Dublin.This gave rise to the misconception that from the outset the survival of Roman- Dutch law was under threat, if not from a hostile Bar, at least from one with little knowledge of Roman-Dutch Law. The Charter of Justice also made provision for the admission of persons who had practised as advocates in the former Court of Justiceand from 1803, were required to have graduated in law in Holland. For the first ten years of its existence, only former advocates of the old Court of Justice practisedbefore the Cape Supreme Court, the one exception being the Attorney-General. Perusal of the Menzies' Reports, which cover the years 1828 to 1849, reveals theextent to which advocates relied on Roman-Dutch authority. In every contested civil case old authority is cited, sometimes on an extensive scale. During the fi rst years of the Cape Supreme Court, the advocates played a vital role in affirming the status of Roman-Dutch law as an integral part of the law of the Colony. This continued throughout the nineteenth century. At the Cape during the nineteenth century there was no bellum juridicum between the proponents of Roman-Dutch law and English law. This does not mean that Roman-Dutch law was the only actor on the stage. Ties with Holland had been severed. Roman Dutch-law found application within an English colonial political environment, and the courts operated within a procedural regime of English origin. In the Netherlands, the country of origin of Roman-Dutchlaw, the introduction of a code based on the French Civil Code meant that Roman- Dutch law was no longer a living system. In the circumstances, developments in the field of mercantile law, in particular, were assimilated with reference to English law and through legislation derived from English precedents. Whatever tensions there might have been at times, these various elements were in fact the building blocks of the new mixed system. From the very first years, the advocates, in a pragmatic way, played their part in fashioning a coherent system from these building blocks.
莱因哈德·齐默尔曼(Reinhard Zimmermann)在对19世纪末好望角殖民地最高法院判决的研究中,强调了律师协会的重要性。对19世纪早期开普律师事务所律师的专业活动进行研究,有必要重新考虑当前的假设。1827年的《司法宪章》(Charter of Justice)要求辩护律师必须是英国律师协会的会员,或者是牛津大学、剑桥大学或都柏林大学的法学博士。这引起了一种误解,即从一开始,罗马-荷兰法的生存就受到了威胁,如果不是来自一个充满敌意的律师协会,至少来自一个对罗马-荷兰法知之甚少的律师协会。《司法宪章》还规定,从1803年起,在前法院担任辩护律师的人必须在荷兰法律专业毕业。在开普最高法院成立的头十年里,只有旧法院的前辩护人在它面前执业,唯一的例外是总检察长。仔细阅读孟席斯的报告(涵盖1828年至1849年),就会发现拥护者在多大程度上依赖罗马-荷兰的权威。在每一个有争议的民事案件中,旧的权威都被引用,有时引用的范围很广。在开普最高法院成立的头几年里,辩护人在确认罗马-荷兰法作为殖民地法律组成部分的地位方面发挥了至关重要的作用。这种情况持续了整个19世纪。在19世纪的好望角,罗马-荷兰法的支持者和英国法的支持者之间并不存在司法战。这并不意味着罗马-荷兰法是舞台上唯一的演员。与荷兰的关系被切断。罗马荷兰法适用于英国殖民政治环境,法院在英国起源的程序制度下运作。在罗马-荷兰法的发源地荷兰,以法国民法典为基础的法典的引入意味着罗马-荷兰法不再是一个有生命的体系。在这种情况下,特别是商法领域的发展,参照英国法律并通过源自英国先例的立法加以吸收。无论有时会有多么紧张,这些不同的元素实际上是新的混合系统的基石。从最初几年开始,倡导者就以务实的方式,在从这些基石中塑造一个连贯的体系方面发挥了自己的作用。