Unemployment Insurance in Survey and Administrative Data

FEDS Notes Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.17016/2380-7172.3135
Jeff Larrimore, Jacob A. Mortenson, David Splinter
{"title":"Unemployment Insurance in Survey and Administrative Data","authors":"Jeff Larrimore, Jacob A. Mortenson, David Splinter","doi":"10.17016/2380-7172.3135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits were a central part of the social safety net during the Covid-19 recession. UI benefits, however, are severely understated in surveys. Using administrative tax data, we find that over half of UI benefits were missed in major survey data, with a greater understatement among low-income workers. As a result, 2020 official poverty rates were overstated by about 2 percentage points, and corrected poverty reached a six-decade low. We provide data to correct underreporting in surveys and show that, compared to UI benefits, the UI exclusion tax expenditure was less targeted at low incomes.","PeriodicalId":411218,"journal":{"name":"FEDS Notes","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEDS Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17016/2380-7172.3135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits were a central part of the social safety net during the Covid-19 recession. UI benefits, however, are severely understated in surveys. Using administrative tax data, we find that over half of UI benefits were missed in major survey data, with a greater understatement among low-income workers. As a result, 2020 official poverty rates were overstated by about 2 percentage points, and corrected poverty reached a six-decade low. We provide data to correct underreporting in surveys and show that, compared to UI benefits, the UI exclusion tax expenditure was less targeted at low incomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失业保险的调查和管理数据
在2019冠状病毒病经济衰退期间,失业保险(UI)福利是社会安全网的核心部分。然而,在调查中,UI的好处被严重低估了。利用行政税收数据,我们发现,在主要调查数据中,超过一半的失业保险福利被遗漏了,低收入工人的低估程度更大。因此,2020年官方贫困率被夸大了约2个百分点,修正后的贫困率达到了60年来的最低水平。我们提供了数据来纠正调查中的漏报,并表明,与失业保险福利相比,失业保险排除税支出较少针对低收入者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rising Markups and Declining Business Dynamism: Evidence From the Industry Cross Section Quantifying Treasury Cash-Futures Basis Trades Measuring Unemployment Risk Assessing the Extent of Trade Fragmentation Measuring U.S. Cross-Border Securities Flows: New Data and A Guide for Researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1