Nikotinabhängigkeit und Motivation zur Raucherentwöhnung bei Patienten einer kardiologisch-pneumologischen Akutklinik

W. Häuser1, Nicole Schaal1, P. Schiedermaier1, G. Görge2
{"title":"Nikotinabhängigkeit und Motivation zur Raucherentwöhnung bei Patienten einer kardiologisch-pneumologischen Akutklinik","authors":"W. Häuser1, Nicole Schaal1, P. Schiedermaier1, G. Görge2","doi":"10.1055/s-2002-32861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Tobacco cessation interventions are cost effective therapies in the secondary prevention of coronary heart and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases which however are rarely used in Germany. Therefore the frequency and the degree of tobacco addiction, the previous treatment of tobacco abuse and the present motivation for smoking cessation of all patients treated within one month in a department of cardiology/pneumology were assessed. 255 of 264 admitted patients (39 % women, 61 % men, mean age 65 +/- 13 years) were evaluated. 33/255 patients (13 %) were smokers, 110/255 (43 %) were former smokers and 112/255 (44 %) patients never smoked. 25/33 (76 %) of the smoking patients met the criteria of nicotine dependence and 8/33 (24 %) the criteria of nicotine abuse of the DSM-IV. According to the Fagerstrom-Nicotine-Dependence-Test (FTND) 6/33 (18 %) smokers were low nicotine dependent (FTND 0 - 3 points), 24/33 (73 %) smokers were moderate nicotine dependent (FTND 4 - 7 points) and 3/33 (9 %) smokers were high nicotine dependent (FTND 8 - 10 points). 8/33 patients (24 %) agreed in, 8/33 patients (24 %) were undecisive with regard to and 17/33 (52 %) smokers refused smoking cessation treatment during their hospital stay. There was no difference in the FTND between patients willing to stop smoking and patients which were undecisive or unwilling to stop smoking. 27/33 (82 %) patients were pointed to the existence of a tobacco induced disease by physicians, 14/33 (42 %) had received informations about smoking cessation, 7/33 (21 %) had received nicotine substitution and 3/33 (9 %) other treatments (smoking cessation training, acupuncture) in the past. Motivation for and realization of smoking cessation interventions should be considered as important tasks of the psychosomatic or addiction primary care in private practices and hospitals.","PeriodicalId":345802,"journal":{"name":"Psychother Psych Med","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychother Psych Med","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-32861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: Tobacco cessation interventions are cost effective therapies in the secondary prevention of coronary heart and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases which however are rarely used in Germany. Therefore the frequency and the degree of tobacco addiction, the previous treatment of tobacco abuse and the present motivation for smoking cessation of all patients treated within one month in a department of cardiology/pneumology were assessed. 255 of 264 admitted patients (39 % women, 61 % men, mean age 65 +/- 13 years) were evaluated. 33/255 patients (13 %) were smokers, 110/255 (43 %) were former smokers and 112/255 (44 %) patients never smoked. 25/33 (76 %) of the smoking patients met the criteria of nicotine dependence and 8/33 (24 %) the criteria of nicotine abuse of the DSM-IV. According to the Fagerstrom-Nicotine-Dependence-Test (FTND) 6/33 (18 %) smokers were low nicotine dependent (FTND 0 - 3 points), 24/33 (73 %) smokers were moderate nicotine dependent (FTND 4 - 7 points) and 3/33 (9 %) smokers were high nicotine dependent (FTND 8 - 10 points). 8/33 patients (24 %) agreed in, 8/33 patients (24 %) were undecisive with regard to and 17/33 (52 %) smokers refused smoking cessation treatment during their hospital stay. There was no difference in the FTND between patients willing to stop smoking and patients which were undecisive or unwilling to stop smoking. 27/33 (82 %) patients were pointed to the existence of a tobacco induced disease by physicians, 14/33 (42 %) had received informations about smoking cessation, 7/33 (21 %) had received nicotine substitution and 3/33 (9 %) other treatments (smoking cessation training, acupuncture) in the past. Motivation for and realization of smoking cessation interventions should be considered as important tasks of the psychosomatic or addiction primary care in private practices and hospitals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼古丁依赖,提高心肺检查患者吸烟能力
戒烟干预措施在冠心病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的二级预防中具有成本效益,但在德国很少使用。因此,我们评估了所有在心内科/肺炎科一个月内接受治疗的患者的烟草成瘾频率和程度、既往的烟草滥用治疗以及目前戒烟的动机。对264例住院患者中的255例(39%为女性,61%为男性,平均年龄65±13岁)进行了评估。33/255(13%)为吸烟者,110/255(43%)为既往吸烟者,112/255(44%)为从不吸烟的患者。吸烟患者中有25/33(76%)符合DSM-IV尼古丁依赖标准,8/33(24%)符合DSM-IV尼古丁滥用标准。根据fagerstrom -尼古丁依赖测试(FTND), 6/33(18%)吸烟者为低尼古丁依赖(FTND 0 - 3分),24/33(73%)吸烟者为中度尼古丁依赖(FTND 4 - 7分),3/33(9%)吸烟者为高尼古丁依赖(FTND 8 - 10分)。8/33例患者(24%)同意,8/33例患者(24%)不确定,17/33例(52%)吸烟者在住院期间拒绝戒烟治疗。愿意戒烟的患者与犹豫不决或不愿戒烟的患者之间的FTND没有差异。27/33(82%)的患者被医生指出存在烟草引起的疾病,14/33(42%)的患者接受过戒烟信息,7/33(21%)的患者接受过尼古丁替代治疗,3/33(9%)的患者过去接受过其他治疗(戒烟培训、针灸)。戒烟干预措施的动机和实现应被视为私人诊所和医院身心或成瘾初级保健的重要任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nachruf auf Prof. Dr. med. Jörg Michael Herrmann „Psychotherapeutische Forschung und psychosomatische Praxis” In eigener Sache Langzeitstudierende als Klienten psychotherapeutischer Beratung Veränderungsmessung mit der Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): Änderungssensitivität und Änderungsreliabilität
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1