Evaluation of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes for Yield and Yield Attributing Traits at High Land of Arsi, South East Ethiopia

Kedir Yimam, Aliyi Robsa, Gizachew Yilma, Temesgen Abo
{"title":"Evaluation of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes for Yield and Yield Attributing Traits at High Land of Arsi, South East Ethiopia","authors":"Kedir Yimam, Aliyi Robsa, Gizachew Yilma, Temesgen Abo","doi":"10.11648/J.SJAMS.20200806.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The production and productivity of field pea in Ethiopia is constrained by low-yielding potential of land race, susceptibility to diseases like powdery mildew and Ascochyta blight/spot as well as a biotic stresses like frost and soil acidity. The field experiment was conducted in 2018/19 main cropping season at two locations using simple lattice design to evaluate the genetic variability and performance of forty nine field pea genotypes for yield ad yield attributing traits. The combined/pooled / analysis of variance revealed highly significant (P≤0.01) to significant (P≤0.05) differences among genotypes observed for all traits under study except for number of seeds pod-1. The seed yield ranged from 1955 to 5997 kg ha-1 with a mean of 3803 kg across the two locations. Two genotypes PDFPT-BEK and P-313-053 were relatively high yielder over the two locations. The genotypic (GCV) and phenotypic (PCV) coefficient of variation (GCV) ranged from (1.07%) to (22.40%) and (1.22%) to (28.18% for days to maturity and grain yield, respectively for combined analyses. The PCV values were relatively greater than GCV in magnitude for all traits, of which significantly higher PCV than GCV values observed for number of pods per plant, Stand count, powdery mildew and ascocayta blight, but insignificant differences between PCV and GCV values observed for days to flowering, days to maturity, plant height, 1000 seed weight, and grain yield. Broad sense heritability ranged from 23.66% to 90.73%. The genetic advance as percentage of mean (GAM) varied from 1.92% to 36.73%. Higher heritability (H2) coupled with high GAM observed for grain yield per ha and Higher heritability (H2) coupled with Moderate or relatively high value of GAM in plant height and seed size. Therefore, improvement of these traits could be done through selection of genotypes based on the phenotypic performance.","PeriodicalId":422938,"journal":{"name":"Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.SJAMS.20200806.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The production and productivity of field pea in Ethiopia is constrained by low-yielding potential of land race, susceptibility to diseases like powdery mildew and Ascochyta blight/spot as well as a biotic stresses like frost and soil acidity. The field experiment was conducted in 2018/19 main cropping season at two locations using simple lattice design to evaluate the genetic variability and performance of forty nine field pea genotypes for yield ad yield attributing traits. The combined/pooled / analysis of variance revealed highly significant (P≤0.01) to significant (P≤0.05) differences among genotypes observed for all traits under study except for number of seeds pod-1. The seed yield ranged from 1955 to 5997 kg ha-1 with a mean of 3803 kg across the two locations. Two genotypes PDFPT-BEK and P-313-053 were relatively high yielder over the two locations. The genotypic (GCV) and phenotypic (PCV) coefficient of variation (GCV) ranged from (1.07%) to (22.40%) and (1.22%) to (28.18% for days to maturity and grain yield, respectively for combined analyses. The PCV values were relatively greater than GCV in magnitude for all traits, of which significantly higher PCV than GCV values observed for number of pods per plant, Stand count, powdery mildew and ascocayta blight, but insignificant differences between PCV and GCV values observed for days to flowering, days to maturity, plant height, 1000 seed weight, and grain yield. Broad sense heritability ranged from 23.66% to 90.73%. The genetic advance as percentage of mean (GAM) varied from 1.92% to 36.73%. Higher heritability (H2) coupled with high GAM observed for grain yield per ha and Higher heritability (H2) coupled with Moderate or relatively high value of GAM in plant height and seed size. Therefore, improvement of these traits could be done through selection of genotypes based on the phenotypic performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大田豌豆(Pisum sativum L.)的评价埃塞俄比亚东南部Arsi高地产量及产量性状基因型研究
埃塞俄比亚大田豌豆的产量和生产力受到土地品种的低产量潜力、对白粉病和Ascochyta疫病/斑疹等疾病的易感性以及霜冻和土壤酸度等生物胁迫的制约。本试验于2018/19年主要种植季在两个地点进行,采用简单格设计对49个大田豌豆基因型的产量和产量归因性状的遗传变异和表现进行了评价。综合/汇总/方差分析显示,除pod-1种子数外,各基因型间差异均极显著(P≤0.01)至显著(P≤0.05)。种子产量在1955 ~ 5997公斤/公顷之间,两个地点的平均产量为3803公斤/公顷。两个基因型PDFPT-BEK和P-313-053在两个地点的产量相对较高。组合分析结果表明,籽粒产量和生育期基因型变异系数(GCV)和表型变异系数(PCV)分别为(1.07% ~ 22.40%)和(1.22% ~ 28.18%)。各性状的PCV值均相对大于GCV值,其中单株荚果数、林分数、白粉病和子囊疫病的PCV值显著高于GCV值,而开花天数、成熟天数、株高、千粒重和籽粒产量的PCV值与GCV值差异不显著。广义遗传力为23.66% ~ 90.73%。遗传进步率(GAM)在1.92% ~ 36.73%之间变化。较高遗传力(H2)配较高GAM的每公顷产量,较高遗传力(H2)配中等或较高GAM的株高和种子大小。因此,这些性状的改良可以通过基于表型表现的基因型选择来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimization of the Non-Linear Diffussion Equations CPV Monitoring - Optimization of Control Chart Design by Reducing the False Alarm Rate and Nuisance Signal On Different Extraction Methods of Factor Analysis Improvement of the Raabe-Duhamel Convergence Criterion Generalized Volatility Modelling of Stock Returns of Selected Nigerian Oil and Gas Companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1