External Auditors' Assessments of Cyber-Security Risks

Tran Nguen Bao Ngo, A. Tick
{"title":"External Auditors' Assessments of Cyber-Security Risks","authors":"Tran Nguen Bao Ngo, A. Tick","doi":"10.1109/SAMI50585.2021.9378638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mushrooming occurrences of cyber criminals in the recent years have provoked an alarm about the drawback of technological growth and the increasing dependence of human beings on technology. The severity of this situation in the business world is even greater and greater than other fields, which leads many people raise a question about the response of external auditors - the ones who are responsible for detecting any accounting faults - towards cybersecurity-attacked companies - the ones which can try their best to hide their difficulties from their investors and stakeholders. Hence, this study investigates whether external auditors pay more attention to cybersecurity-attacked companies by applying higher audit fee charges. Using a sample of 100 global small, medium and large companies, the study has found out that there is a positive relationship between audit fees and breach, which means that external auditors find more risks and exert more efforts when auditing the cybersecurity-attacked companies.","PeriodicalId":402414,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 19th World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 19th World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAMI50585.2021.9378638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mushrooming occurrences of cyber criminals in the recent years have provoked an alarm about the drawback of technological growth and the increasing dependence of human beings on technology. The severity of this situation in the business world is even greater and greater than other fields, which leads many people raise a question about the response of external auditors - the ones who are responsible for detecting any accounting faults - towards cybersecurity-attacked companies - the ones which can try their best to hide their difficulties from their investors and stakeholders. Hence, this study investigates whether external auditors pay more attention to cybersecurity-attacked companies by applying higher audit fee charges. Using a sample of 100 global small, medium and large companies, the study has found out that there is a positive relationship between audit fees and breach, which means that external auditors find more risks and exert more efforts when auditing the cybersecurity-attacked companies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外部审计机构对网络安全风险的评估
近年来,如雨后春笋般出现的网络犯罪事件引起了人们对技术发展的弊端和人类对技术日益依赖的警觉。这种情况在商业世界的严重性甚至比其他领域更大,这导致许多人提出一个问题,即外部审计师——负责发现任何会计错误的人——对受到网络安全攻击的公司的反应——这些公司可以尽力向投资者和利益相关者隐瞒他们的困难。因此,本研究考察外部审计师是否通过收取更高的审计费用来更加关注受网络安全攻击的公司。本研究以全球100家中小企业和大型企业为样本,发现审计费用与违规行为之间存在正相关关系,即外部审计人员在审计受到网络安全攻击的公司时发现的风险更多,付出的努力也更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usage of RAPTOR for travel time minimizing journey planner Slip Control by Identifying the Magnetic Field of the Elements of an Asynchronous Motor Supervised Operational Change Point Detection using Ensemble Long-Short Term Memory in a Multicomponent Industrial System Improving the activity recognition using GMAF and transfer learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment A Baseline Assessment Method of UAV Swarm Resilience Based on Complex Networks*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1