5 Unity in the Stoic Sense

{"title":"5 Unity in the Stoic Sense","authors":"","doi":"10.2478/9783110620580-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although it is impossible to establish with utmost certainty what were the philosophical sources of the teaching of any of the Fathers, in the case of Tertullian and Ambrose it is commonly accepted that they drew from the Stoic current. It is very probable that despite its materialism Stoicism exerted a much greater impact on the thoughts of the first Christian than it is commonly believed. It could have been direct or indirect impact through Neoplatonism, which, after all, was derived from the combination of Platonism and Stoicism. Both those philosophical systems accepted that the entire nature constitutes oneness because it was formed from a single matter (Stoicism) or derives from the One (Neoplatonism). The conviction of the natural, virtually physical unity of the entire humankind and even the entire universe is particularly strongly voiced by Tertullian and Ambrose. It may not be excluded that their conviction did not come from their fascination with philosophy but from Irenaeus and his concept of plasmatio Adae, and most probably it had not one but several sources. The title of this chapter is not meant to exclude other possibilities: it should rather to lead to thinking about the natural physical unity which in the first place is associated with the Stoic thought.","PeriodicalId":162872,"journal":{"name":"We Were All in Adam","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"We Were All in Adam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110620580-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although it is impossible to establish with utmost certainty what were the philosophical sources of the teaching of any of the Fathers, in the case of Tertullian and Ambrose it is commonly accepted that they drew from the Stoic current. It is very probable that despite its materialism Stoicism exerted a much greater impact on the thoughts of the first Christian than it is commonly believed. It could have been direct or indirect impact through Neoplatonism, which, after all, was derived from the combination of Platonism and Stoicism. Both those philosophical systems accepted that the entire nature constitutes oneness because it was formed from a single matter (Stoicism) or derives from the One (Neoplatonism). The conviction of the natural, virtually physical unity of the entire humankind and even the entire universe is particularly strongly voiced by Tertullian and Ambrose. It may not be excluded that their conviction did not come from their fascination with philosophy but from Irenaeus and his concept of plasmatio Adae, and most probably it had not one but several sources. The title of this chapter is not meant to exclude other possibilities: it should rather to lead to thinking about the natural physical unity which in the first place is associated with the Stoic thought.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯多葛派意义上的统一
虽然它是不可能建立与最大的确定性是什么哲学来源的教学的任何父亲,在德尔图良和安布罗斯的情况下,它是普遍接受的,他们从斯多葛派的潮流。这是很可能的,尽管它的唯物主义斯多葛主义施加了更大的影响,对第一个基督徒的思想比它通常认为的。新柏拉图主义是柏拉图主义和斯多葛主义的结合体,它的影响可能是直接的,也可能是间接的。这两种哲学体系都认为,整个自然是一体的,因为它是由一个单一的物质形成的(斯多葛主义),或者来自于一个(新柏拉图主义)。德尔图良和安布罗斯特别强烈地表达了对整个人类甚至整个宇宙的自然的、实际上的物理统一的信念。可以排除的是,他们的信念不是来自于他们对哲学的迷恋,而是来自于爱任纽和他的阿黛等离子体的概念,而且很可能有不止一个,而是几个来源。本章的标题并不是要排除其他可能性:它应该引导我们思考自然的物理统一性,这首先是与斯多葛派思想联系在一起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3 Real Unity of Human Nature List of Abbreviations 2 General Issues Indices 4 Mankind in Adam’s Loins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1