The productive autonomy of public forest-dwellers in the Amazon: two case studies of community timber management

J. Pacheco, C. Azevedo-Ramos, E. Nakano
{"title":"The productive autonomy of public forest-dwellers in the Amazon: two case studies of community timber management","authors":"J. Pacheco, C. Azevedo-Ramos, E. Nakano","doi":"10.18472/sustdeb.v13n1.2022.41279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forest-dwellers in the Brazilian Amazon public forests share the management of the territory and natural resources with governmental agencies, subjecting themselves to State rules. This study aims to evaluate the perception of stakeholders about the autonomy of traditional communities to carry out community timber forest management (CFM) in two federal protected areas. A Swot analysis revealed mismatches in priorities among stakeholder groups (Communities, Government and Partners). Four autonomy parameters were evaluated by 111 stakeholders using a satisfaction questionnaire. Communities and Government had similar perceptions of the autonomy of communities to develop CFM, while Partners were pessimistic. Stakeholders showed greater satisfaction with communities’ social organization than with their business management ability. Licensing, operational tools and administrative knowledge were perceived as bottlenecks for community enterprises. Nevertheless, targeted public policies and a minimum regulatory requirement for CFM may guarantee community autonomy to maintain their way of life and make their forest enterprises viable.","PeriodicalId":146126,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability in Debate","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability in Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18472/sustdeb.v13n1.2022.41279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest-dwellers in the Brazilian Amazon public forests share the management of the territory and natural resources with governmental agencies, subjecting themselves to State rules. This study aims to evaluate the perception of stakeholders about the autonomy of traditional communities to carry out community timber forest management (CFM) in two federal protected areas. A Swot analysis revealed mismatches in priorities among stakeholder groups (Communities, Government and Partners). Four autonomy parameters were evaluated by 111 stakeholders using a satisfaction questionnaire. Communities and Government had similar perceptions of the autonomy of communities to develop CFM, while Partners were pessimistic. Stakeholders showed greater satisfaction with communities’ social organization than with their business management ability. Licensing, operational tools and administrative knowledge were perceived as bottlenecks for community enterprises. Nevertheless, targeted public policies and a minimum regulatory requirement for CFM may guarantee community autonomy to maintain their way of life and make their forest enterprises viable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚马逊地区公共森林居民的生产自主权:社区木材管理的两个案例研究
巴西亚马逊公共森林的森林居民与政府机构共同管理领土和自然资源,服从国家规则。本研究旨在评估利益相关者对传统社区在两个联邦保护区开展社区用材林管理(CFM)的自主权的看法。Swot分析揭示了利益相关者群体(社区、政府和合作伙伴)优先级的不匹配。111名利益相关者使用满意度问卷对四个自治参数进行了评估。社区和政府对社区发展CFM的自主权持类似看法,而合作伙伴则持悲观态度。利益相关者对社区社会组织的满意度高于对社区商业管理能力的满意度。许可证、业务工具和行政知识被认为是社区企业的瓶颈。然而,有针对性的公共政策和对森林资源管理的最低管理要求可以保证社区维持其生活方式的自主权,并使其森林企业能够生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparação dos padrões de qualidade do ar entre o Brasil e países dos cinco continentes Percepção dos impactos socioambientais causados por geradores eólicos no estado do Piauí, Nordeste do Brasil Energy communities of repair in remote infrastructures: a study of Puerto Edén in the Chilean Patagonia The socio-environmental aftermath of gold mining in the Amazon: the case of Yutzupino in Napo, Ecuador Condições institucionais para o desenvolvimento das comunidades energéticas no Chile e no Brasil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1