Critical thinking dispositions’ level among neophyte nursing students

Huma Rubab, A. Pienaar, Khauhelo Succes Mahalatsi, A. Hussain, R. Gul
{"title":"Critical thinking dispositions’ level among neophyte nursing students","authors":"Huma Rubab, A. Pienaar, Khauhelo Succes Mahalatsi, A. Hussain, R. Gul","doi":"10.32593/jstmu/vol4.iss2.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Critical thinking dispositions (CTD) are valued across the health professions disciplines being essential for decision-making, critical judgment and managing complex health situations. Promoting critical-thinking dispositions in undergraduate nursing students can support the students to utilize critical thinking during challenging patient care and problem-solving situations. \nObjective: This study aimed to assess the level of critical thinking disposition among neophyte nursing students in a private nursing college. \nMethodology: An analytical cross-sectional study design was adopted. Neophyte students (n=98) of the BSN program participated in the study. Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale (CTDS) of 54 items under seven constructs was utilized to assess CTD level. Data was analyzed at descriptive and inferential level using SPSS 23.0 version.  \nResults: Overall, CTD among neophytes nursing students is at 75% a progressive level. Contextual and inquisitiveness construct of CTDs are at positive CTD level while other constructs are at the progressive level. Students have completed their matriculation from public 55(56.1%) while FSc (Faculty of Science) from private sector 57(58.2%). Mothers of most neophytes 73(74.5%) were housewives and fathers were working in private organization 32(32.7%). There was no statistically significant association between CTD’s construct with demographic variables (P-Value, >0.05). FSc marks showed a significant association with overall CTD scores, intellectual and inquisitiveness, while admission entry test scores associate significantly with intellectual construct. \nConclusion: The CTD level of neophyte is at a progressive level which suggest that different teaching and learning strategies could be implemented to improve this level. ","PeriodicalId":302306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32593/jstmu/vol4.iss2.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Critical thinking dispositions (CTD) are valued across the health professions disciplines being essential for decision-making, critical judgment and managing complex health situations. Promoting critical-thinking dispositions in undergraduate nursing students can support the students to utilize critical thinking during challenging patient care and problem-solving situations. Objective: This study aimed to assess the level of critical thinking disposition among neophyte nursing students in a private nursing college. Methodology: An analytical cross-sectional study design was adopted. Neophyte students (n=98) of the BSN program participated in the study. Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale (CTDS) of 54 items under seven constructs was utilized to assess CTD level. Data was analyzed at descriptive and inferential level using SPSS 23.0 version.  Results: Overall, CTD among neophytes nursing students is at 75% a progressive level. Contextual and inquisitiveness construct of CTDs are at positive CTD level while other constructs are at the progressive level. Students have completed their matriculation from public 55(56.1%) while FSc (Faculty of Science) from private sector 57(58.2%). Mothers of most neophytes 73(74.5%) were housewives and fathers were working in private organization 32(32.7%). There was no statistically significant association between CTD’s construct with demographic variables (P-Value, >0.05). FSc marks showed a significant association with overall CTD scores, intellectual and inquisitiveness, while admission entry test scores associate significantly with intellectual construct. Conclusion: The CTD level of neophyte is at a progressive level which suggest that different teaching and learning strategies could be implemented to improve this level. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护生批判性思维倾向水平的研究
导论:批判性思维能力(CTD)在卫生专业学科中受到重视,对决策、批判性判断和管理复杂的卫生状况至关重要。促进本科护理学生的批判性思维倾向可以支持学生在具有挑战性的病人护理和解决问题的情况下利用批判性思维。目的:了解某私立护理学院护生的批判性思维倾向水平。方法:采用分析性横断面研究设计。BSN项目的新生(n=98)参与了研究。采用批判性思维倾向量表(Critical Thinking disposition Scale, CTDS) 7个构式共54个题项评估CTDS水平。数据采用SPSS 23.0进行描述性和推断性分析。结果:总体而言,护理专业新生的CTD水平为75%。语境构念和好奇构念处于积极构念水平,其他构念处于递进构念水平。公立学院的学生有55人(56.1%),私立学院的学生有57人(58.2%)。大多数新生儿的母亲73人(74.5%)是家庭主妇,父亲32人(32.7%)在私营机构工作。CTD结构与人口统计学变量之间无统计学意义(p值,0.05)。FSc分数与CTD总分、智力和好奇心显著相关,而入学考试分数与智力结构显著相关。结论:新手的CTD水平处于进步性水平,可采取不同的教学策略提高CTD水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Upholding the responsible conduct of medical research in Pakistan: The buck stops where? The cardiovascular system's Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS). Hyper Immunoglobulin E (IgE); an immune deficiency (Job Syndrome) Neophyte baccalaureate nursing student’s perceptions of motivation towards clinical practice. A retrospective study on epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in Baluchistan (Pakistan) and its future perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1