Improving Outcomes through Implementation of an Infant Spinal Anesthesia Program for Urologic Surgery Patients

J. Cronin, Brenda J Satterthwaite, G. Robalino, D. Casella, M. Hsieh, Md Sohel Rana, Alia Fink, S. Pestieau
{"title":"Improving Outcomes through Implementation of an Infant Spinal Anesthesia Program for Urologic Surgery Patients","authors":"J. Cronin, Brenda J Satterthwaite, G. Robalino, D. Casella, M. Hsieh, Md Sohel Rana, Alia Fink, S. Pestieau","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Spinal anesthesia has a long history as an effective and safe technique to avoid general anesthesia in infants undergoing surgery. However, spinal anesthesia was rarely used as the primary anesthetic in this population at our institution. This healthcare improvement initiative aimed to increase the percentage of successful spinal placements as the primary anesthetic in infants undergoing circumcision, open orchidopexy, or hernia repair from 11% to 50% by December 31, 2019, and sustain that rate for 6 months. Methods: An interdisciplinary team created a key driver diagram and implemented the following interventions: education of nurses, surgeons, and patient families; focused anesthesiologist training on the infant spinal procedure; premedication; availability of supplies; and surgical schedule optimization. The team collected data retrospectively by reviewing electronic medical records (Cerner, North Kansas City, Mo.). The primary outcome was the percentage of infants undergoing circumcision, open orchidopexy, or hernia repair who received a successful spinal as the primary anesthetic. The team tracked this measure and evaluated using a statistical process control chart. Results: Between August 1, 2018, and February 29, 2020, researchers identified 470 infants (235 preintervention and 235 postintervention) who underwent circumcision, open orchidopexy, or inguinal hernia repair. Following the interventions in this project, there was a statistically significant increase in successful spinal placement from 11% to 45% (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: This quality improvement project successfully increased the percentage of patients receiving spinal anesthesia for specific surgical procedures by increasing the number of patients who underwent successful spinal anesthesia placement.","PeriodicalId":343243,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Quality and Safety","volume":"163 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Quality and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia has a long history as an effective and safe technique to avoid general anesthesia in infants undergoing surgery. However, spinal anesthesia was rarely used as the primary anesthetic in this population at our institution. This healthcare improvement initiative aimed to increase the percentage of successful spinal placements as the primary anesthetic in infants undergoing circumcision, open orchidopexy, or hernia repair from 11% to 50% by December 31, 2019, and sustain that rate for 6 months. Methods: An interdisciplinary team created a key driver diagram and implemented the following interventions: education of nurses, surgeons, and patient families; focused anesthesiologist training on the infant spinal procedure; premedication; availability of supplies; and surgical schedule optimization. The team collected data retrospectively by reviewing electronic medical records (Cerner, North Kansas City, Mo.). The primary outcome was the percentage of infants undergoing circumcision, open orchidopexy, or hernia repair who received a successful spinal as the primary anesthetic. The team tracked this measure and evaluated using a statistical process control chart. Results: Between August 1, 2018, and February 29, 2020, researchers identified 470 infants (235 preintervention and 235 postintervention) who underwent circumcision, open orchidopexy, or inguinal hernia repair. Following the interventions in this project, there was a statistically significant increase in successful spinal placement from 11% to 45% (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: This quality improvement project successfully increased the percentage of patients receiving spinal anesthesia for specific surgical procedures by increasing the number of patients who underwent successful spinal anesthesia placement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过实施婴儿脊髓麻醉方案改善泌尿外科患者的预后
导语:脊髓麻醉作为一种有效且安全的技术在婴儿手术中避免全身麻醉已有很长的历史。然而,在我们的机构中,脊髓麻醉很少被用作主要麻醉剂。这项医疗保健改善计划旨在到2019年12月31日,将接受包皮环切术、开放式兰花切除术或疝气修补术的婴儿脊柱置入作为主要麻醉剂的成功率从11%提高到50%,并将这一比例维持6个月。方法:一个跨学科团队创建了一个关键驱动图,并实施了以下干预措施:对护士、外科医生和患者家属进行教育;重点麻醉师培训婴儿脊柱手术;术前用药法;供应的可得性;以及手术计划的优化。该团队通过回顾电子医疗记录(密苏里州北堪萨斯城Cerner)回顾性收集数据。主要结果是接受包皮环切术、开放睾丸切除术或疝修补术的婴儿中接受脊髓作为主要麻醉的婴儿的百分比。该团队跟踪该测量并使用统计过程控制图进行评估。结果:在2018年8月1日至2020年2月29日期间,研究人员确定了470名婴儿(干预前235名,干预后235名)接受了包皮环切术、开放式睾丸切除术或腹股沟疝修补术。在这个项目的干预之后,成功放置脊柱的比例从11%增加到45%,具有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。结论:本质量改进项目通过增加成功放置脊髓麻醉的患者数量,成功地提高了特定外科手术中接受脊髓麻醉的患者比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving Wait Times for Children with Caregivers with Limited English Proficiency in the Emergency Department Utilizing Clinical Decision Support in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection across a Large Pediatric Primary Care Network Pediatric Inpatient Leaders, Views Changed with COVID-19: A Call to Re-engage in Quality Improvement Qualitative Study on Safe and Effective Handover Information during a Rapid Response Team Encounter New strategies to Reduce Unnecessary Antibiotic Use in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1