Politically Exposed Entities: How to Tailor PEP Requirements to PEP Owned Legal Entities

Daniele Canestri
{"title":"Politically Exposed Entities: How to Tailor PEP Requirements to PEP Owned Legal Entities","authors":"Daniele Canestri","doi":"10.1108/JMLC-06-2018-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to address the money laundering risk posed by politically exposed person’s (PEP’s) controlled legal entities. International standards and national legislation require enhanced due diligence of political office holders but no specific requirements exist on entities controlled by PEPs. While regulators expect the stringent AML risk mitigation regarding this type of entities, financial institutions have no guidelines to follow. This gap produces inconsistent due diligence measures applied to entities with significant PEPs’ connection.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper uses comparative analysis to identify discrepancies between legal requirements and their interpretation. Moreover, an empirical approach results in a standardised solution to address these discrepancies.\n\n\nFindings\nThe paper defines the concept of politically exposed entities and the applicable due diligence framework. Anticipating legislative measures, it proposes to introduce this concept via best practices of financial institutions and private banking initiatives such as the Wolfsberg Group.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe research addresses the topic from a legal point of view. However, the implementation of proposed ideas depends on decisions which are political by nature and are not within the scope of this paper.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe paper aims at stimulating a debate in both the private and public sector to form a consistent approach to AML due diligence of legal entities associated to PEPs.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper responds to an identified need to study how legal entities connected to PEPs should be defined and monitored.\n","PeriodicalId":376821,"journal":{"name":"White Collar Crime eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"White Collar Crime eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-06-2018-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to address the money laundering risk posed by politically exposed person’s (PEP’s) controlled legal entities. International standards and national legislation require enhanced due diligence of political office holders but no specific requirements exist on entities controlled by PEPs. While regulators expect the stringent AML risk mitigation regarding this type of entities, financial institutions have no guidelines to follow. This gap produces inconsistent due diligence measures applied to entities with significant PEPs’ connection. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses comparative analysis to identify discrepancies between legal requirements and their interpretation. Moreover, an empirical approach results in a standardised solution to address these discrepancies. Findings The paper defines the concept of politically exposed entities and the applicable due diligence framework. Anticipating legislative measures, it proposes to introduce this concept via best practices of financial institutions and private banking initiatives such as the Wolfsberg Group. Research limitations/implications The research addresses the topic from a legal point of view. However, the implementation of proposed ideas depends on decisions which are political by nature and are not within the scope of this paper. Practical implications The paper aims at stimulating a debate in both the private and public sector to form a consistent approach to AML due diligence of legal entities associated to PEPs. Originality/value This paper responds to an identified need to study how legal entities connected to PEPs should be defined and monitored.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治风险实体:如何调整PEP要求以适应PEP拥有的法律实体
目的探讨政治人物控制的法人实体存在的洗钱风险。国际标准和国家立法要求加强对政治公职人员的尽职调查,但对政治人物控制的实体没有具体要求。虽然监管机构期望对这类实体采取严格的“反洗钱”风险缓解措施,但金融机构没有可遵循的指导方针。这一差距导致对具有重大私人股本关联的实体采取的尽职调查措施不一致。设计/方法/方法本文采用比较分析来确定法律要求及其解释之间的差异。此外,经验方法会产生解决这些差异的标准化解决方案。本文定义了政治风险实体的概念和适用的尽职调查框架。预计立法措施,它建议通过沃尔夫斯堡集团等金融机构和私人银行的最佳实践来引入这一概念。研究的局限性/意义本研究从法律的角度探讨了这一主题。然而,拟议的想法的实施取决于本质上是政治性的决定,不在本文的范围内。实际意义本文旨在激发私营和公共部门的辩论,以形成与pep相关的法律实体的“反洗钱”尽职调查的一致方法。原创性/价值本文回应了研究如何定义和监控与pep相关的法律实体的明确需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
White Collar Crime - An Overview A Historical Flashback of the Formation and Development of Criminal Liability for the Legalization of Money or Other Property Acquired by Criminal Can Countries Justify the Existence of Insider Trading Laws? An Indian Perspective Insider Trading and Strategic Disclosure Securities Scholars’ Comment Letter on Draft Model Whistleblower Award and Protection Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1