Die Sorgfaltsanforderungen des Gläubigers gegenüber dem Bürgen

Thomas Schoditsch
{"title":"Die Sorgfaltsanforderungen des Gläubigers gegenüber dem Bürgen","authors":"Thomas Schoditsch","doi":"10.47782/OEBA202008054501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A creditor has a duty to a guarantor to take reasonable care and not diminish security. If the guarantor suffers damages due to the creditor’s breach of duty of care, he may claim compensation from him or set off the suffered loss against the payment resulting from a claim of the creditor. Yet the exact scope of these duties is not settled by law: The Supreme court has tried to clarify them on the basis of art. 1364 Austrian Civil Code in a number of cases. The following article examines these duties of care and shows that the Supreme Court has already found certain valuable distinctions.","PeriodicalId":142487,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für das gesamte Bank- und Börsenwesen","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für das gesamte Bank- und Börsenwesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47782/OEBA202008054501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A creditor has a duty to a guarantor to take reasonable care and not diminish security. If the guarantor suffers damages due to the creditor’s breach of duty of care, he may claim compensation from him or set off the suffered loss against the payment resulting from a claim of the creditor. Yet the exact scope of these duties is not settled by law: The Supreme court has tried to clarify them on the basis of art. 1364 Austrian Civil Code in a number of cases. The following article examines these duties of care and shows that the Supreme Court has already found certain valuable distinctions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
债权人对担保人的保护要求
债权人有义务对保证人采取合理的谨慎,不减少担保。保证人因债权人违反注意义务而遭受损害的,可以向债权人请求赔偿,也可以用债权人请求的给付抵销所遭受的损失。然而,这些义务的确切范围并没有由法律确定:最高法院试图在艺术的基础上澄清它们。《奥地利民法典》第1364条规定的若干案件。下面的文章探讨了这些注意义务,并表明最高法院已经发现了某些有价值的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Überprüfung des MiFID II/MiFIR-Regelungsrahmens inklusive „MiFID II Quick Fix“ Überprüfung des Inventars innerhalb des Abhandlungsverfahrens Ausgewählte Fragen der Amtshaftung für mangelhafte Bankenaufsicht Kein Rechtsmittel gegen Verwertungsmaßnahmen im Schuldenregulierungsverfahren. Übertragbarkeit oder Höchstpersönlichkeit von Anfechtungsrechten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1