[Ethics committees: medical treatment counseling or prescribing?].

Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1991-09-01
F J Illhardt
{"title":"[Ethics committees: medical treatment counseling or prescribing?].","authors":"F J Illhardt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ethics committees react to the crisis of justification of both research and treatment in modern medicine. Their composition, functioning, task, and identity depend on the question if they consider themselves as instruments of controller consultation. The more moral thinking in medicine is oriented towards support for reasoning, towards consultation for solving conflicts of motivation, and in elucidation interests the more ethics committees will succeed in becoming institutions of consultation by ethical reasoning in medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 9","pages":"LV-LVI"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ethics committees react to the crisis of justification of both research and treatment in modern medicine. Their composition, functioning, task, and identity depend on the question if they consider themselves as instruments of controller consultation. The more moral thinking in medicine is oriented towards support for reasoning, towards consultation for solving conflicts of motivation, and in elucidation interests the more ethics committees will succeed in becoming institutions of consultation by ethical reasoning in medicine.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[伦理委员会:医疗咨询还是开处方?]
伦理委员会对现代医学研究和治疗的正当性危机作出反应。他们的组成、功能、任务和身份取决于他们是否认为自己是控制人员咨询的工具。医学中的道德思维越倾向于支持推理,越倾向于为解决动机冲突而进行磋商,在阐明利益方面,越多的伦理委员会将成功地通过医学中的道德推理成为咨询机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Brief definitions of concepts in medical ethics. 33. Assisted suicide--the problem of the "double effect"]. [Restriction of ethics in medicine]. [Somatic gene therapy--aspects from theological discussion]. [The human embryo as a teleologically defined entity]. [Bioethics in Hong Kong--between morals and economics].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1