Die Europäische Sammelklage

Caroline Meller-Hannich, Armin Höland
{"title":"Die Europäische Sammelklage","authors":"Caroline Meller-Hannich, Armin Höland","doi":"10.1515/gpr.2011.8.4.168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"pose, deletes the entry regarding it in the commercial register in the Member State of origin, and the company’s owners adopt a new instrument of constitution under the laws of the host Member State, and the company applies for registration in the commercial register of the host Member State under the laws of the host Member State? 2. If the answer to the first question is yes, must Articles 43 and 48 EC be interpreted in such a case as meaning that they preclude legislation or practices of such a (host) Member State which prohibit a company established lawfully in any other Member State (the Member State of origin) from transferring its seat to the host Member State and continuing to operate under the laws of that State? 3. With regard to the response to the second question, is the basis on which the host Member State prohibits the company from registration of any relevance, specifically: – if, in its instrument of constitution adopted in the host Member State, the company designates as its predecessor the company established and deleted from the commercial register in the Member State of origin, and applies for the predecessor to be registered as its own predecessor in the commercial register of the host Member State? – in the event of international conversion within the Community, when deciding on the company’s application for registration, must the host Member State take into consideration the instrument recording the fact of the transfer of company seat in the commercial register of the Member State of origin, and, if so, to what extent? 4. Is the host Member State entitled to decide on the application for company registration lodged in the host Member State by the company carrying out international conversion within the Community in accordance with the rules of company law of the host Member State as they relate to the conversion of domestic companies, and to require the company to fulfil all the conditions (e.g. drawing up lists of assets and liabilities and property inventories) laid down by the company law of the host Member State in respect of domestic conversion, or is the host Member State obliged under Articles 43 and 48 EC to distinguish international conversion within the Community from domestic conversion and, if so, to what extent? 2","PeriodicalId":273842,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/gpr.2011.8.4.168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

pose, deletes the entry regarding it in the commercial register in the Member State of origin, and the company’s owners adopt a new instrument of constitution under the laws of the host Member State, and the company applies for registration in the commercial register of the host Member State under the laws of the host Member State? 2. If the answer to the first question is yes, must Articles 43 and 48 EC be interpreted in such a case as meaning that they preclude legislation or practices of such a (host) Member State which prohibit a company established lawfully in any other Member State (the Member State of origin) from transferring its seat to the host Member State and continuing to operate under the laws of that State? 3. With regard to the response to the second question, is the basis on which the host Member State prohibits the company from registration of any relevance, specifically: – if, in its instrument of constitution adopted in the host Member State, the company designates as its predecessor the company established and deleted from the commercial register in the Member State of origin, and applies for the predecessor to be registered as its own predecessor in the commercial register of the host Member State? – in the event of international conversion within the Community, when deciding on the company’s application for registration, must the host Member State take into consideration the instrument recording the fact of the transfer of company seat in the commercial register of the Member State of origin, and, if so, to what extent? 4. Is the host Member State entitled to decide on the application for company registration lodged in the host Member State by the company carrying out international conversion within the Community in accordance with the rules of company law of the host Member State as they relate to the conversion of domestic companies, and to require the company to fulfil all the conditions (e.g. drawing up lists of assets and liabilities and property inventories) laid down by the company law of the host Member State in respect of domestic conversion, or is the host Member State obliged under Articles 43 and 48 EC to distinguish international conversion within the Community from domestic conversion and, if so, to what extent? 2
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲集体诉讼
在原产国的商业登记册中删除有关公司的记项,公司拥有人根据东道国的法律采用新的章程文书,公司根据东道国的法律在东道国的商业登记册中申请注册?2. 如果对第一个问题的回答是肯定的,那么在这种情况下,欧盟第43条和第48条是否应该被解释为它们排除了(东道国)成员国禁止在任何其他成员国(起源成员国)合法成立的公司将其所在地转移到东道国成员国并继续根据该国法律运营的立法或实践?3.关于对第二个问题的答复,东道国会员国禁止公司进行任何相关注册的依据是:-如果公司在东道成员国通过的章程文书中指定在原产成员国成立并从商业登记册上删除的公司为其前身,并申请将该前身在东道成员国的商业登记册上注册为其自己的前身?-如公司在欧共体内进行国际转换,主办成员国在决定公司的注册申请时,是否须考虑在原产成员国商业登记册内记录公司席位转移事实的文书?如果是,在何种程度上?4. 东道成员国是否有权根据东道成员国有关国内公司转换的公司法规则,对在欧共体内进行国际转换的公司在东道成员国提交的公司注册申请作出决定?以及要求公司符合东道成员国公司法就国内转换所规定的所有条件(例如拟备资产、负债和财产清单),或者东道成员国是否有义务根据《欧洲共同体》第43条和第48条区分在共同体内的国际转换与国内转换,如果有,在何种程度上?2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rechtswissenschaftliche Ausbildung in Deutschland: attraktiver zu machen? Verbesserter Zugang zum Recht für Verbraucher? Eine Bewertung der Regelungsvorschläge der EU-Kommission zur Alternativen Streitbeilegung Beachtung ausländischer Rechtshängigkeit in Drittstaatenfällen – ein Beitrag zu Art. 34 EuGVO-E Ein optionales Vertragsrecht für Europa Motor oder Hemmnis für den Binnenmarkt? Rezension zu Massing, Europäisches Internationales Kartelldeliktsrecht und Tzakas, Die Haftung für Kartellrechtsverstöße im internationalen Rechtsverkehr
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1