Tracking academic buoyancy after embedding a transition to university learning component into a first-year calculus sequence.

Juan Abelló
{"title":"Tracking academic buoyancy after embedding a transition to university learning component into a first-year calculus sequence.","authors":"Juan Abelló","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi.15931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Not knowing how university learning is different from high-school learning often introduces challenges that can have a negative effect on first-year student wellness [1]. One alternative to help students develop the required learning skills is to embed this content into regular first-year courses [2]. \nWe deployed screencasts on transition to university learning and student wellness (previously developed by Ostafichuk [3]) in a first-year calculus sequence for engineering students, and measured student academic buoyancy through the yearlong intervention [4]. Our aim was to investigate whether academic buoyancy increased through the year, and whether watching the screencasts correlated with any increases in academic buoyancy. \nResults show that student academic buoyancy increased through the year. The increase was statistically significant and had a large effect size for students who completed all three surveys during this period. The increase was not statistically significant and had a small effect size for students who completed any two surveys, but our analysis suggests this increase was not by chance. Although the intervention was well-received by students, our data did not show a correlation between the intervention and the increase in academic buoyancy. \nLimitations of this study include a small sample size, and our academic buoyancy data having been collected during the 2020-2021 remote learning year.","PeriodicalId":314914,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","volume":"80 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi.15931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Not knowing how university learning is different from high-school learning often introduces challenges that can have a negative effect on first-year student wellness [1]. One alternative to help students develop the required learning skills is to embed this content into regular first-year courses [2]. We deployed screencasts on transition to university learning and student wellness (previously developed by Ostafichuk [3]) in a first-year calculus sequence for engineering students, and measured student academic buoyancy through the yearlong intervention [4]. Our aim was to investigate whether academic buoyancy increased through the year, and whether watching the screencasts correlated with any increases in academic buoyancy. Results show that student academic buoyancy increased through the year. The increase was statistically significant and had a large effect size for students who completed all three surveys during this period. The increase was not statistically significant and had a small effect size for students who completed any two surveys, but our analysis suggests this increase was not by chance. Although the intervention was well-received by students, our data did not show a correlation between the intervention and the increase in academic buoyancy. Limitations of this study include a small sample size, and our academic buoyancy data having been collected during the 2020-2021 remote learning year.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在将过渡到大学学习的组成部分嵌入一年级微积分序列后,跟踪学术浮力。
不知道大学学习与高中学习有何不同,往往会带来挑战,对第一年的学生健康产生负面影响。帮助学生发展所需学习技能的另一种选择是将这些内容嵌入常规的一年级课程b[2]中。我们在一年级工程专业学生的微积分序列中部署了过渡到大学学习和学生健康的视频(之前由Ostafichuk[3]开发),并通过为期一年的干预[4]测量了学生的学业浮力。我们的目的是调查学术浮力是否在一年中有所增加,以及观看视频是否与学术浮力的增加有关。结果显示,学生的学业浮力全年都在增加。这一增长在统计上是显著的,并且对在此期间完成所有三次调查的学生有很大的影响。这种增长在统计上并不显著,对于完成任何两项调查的学生来说,影响都很小,但我们的分析表明,这种增长不是偶然的。虽然这种干预受到了学生们的欢迎,但我们的数据并没有显示出干预与学业浮力的增加之间的相关性。本研究的局限性包括样本量小,并且我们的学术浮力数据是在2020-2021远程学习年度收集的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Makes an Exemplary Engineering Leader? In the Words of Engineers Questioning Green Growth and Sustainable Development in Undergraduate Engineering Memorization: Friend or Foe when Solving Problems in STEM Undergraduate Courses Persistent mistakes in learning basic circuit analysis Development and Assessment of a Training Module on Intellectual Property Literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1