Variability in Serious Safety Event Classification among Children’s Hospitals: A Measure for Comparison?

Amy Poppy, S. Ziniel, D. Hyman
{"title":"Variability in Serious Safety Event Classification among Children’s Hospitals: A Measure for Comparison?","authors":"Amy Poppy, S. Ziniel, D. Hyman","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hospitals have no standard for measuring comparative rates of serious safety events (SSE). A pediatric hospital safety collaborative has used a common definition and measurement system to classify SSE and calculate a serious safety event rate. An opportunity exists to evaluate the use of this measurement system. Methods: A web-based survey utilizing 7 case vignettes was sent to 132 network hospitals to assess agreement in classifying the vignettes as SSEs. Respondents classified the vignettes according to the taxonomy used at their respective organizations for deviations and SSE classification. Results: Of the 82 respondents, 67 (82%) utilized the same SSE classification system. Respondents did not assess deviations for 2 of the 7 vignettes, which had clear deviations. Of the remaining 5 vignettes, 3 had a substantial agreement of deviation (>85%, Gwet’s AC ≥ 0.68), and 2 had fair agreement (<70%, Gwet’s AC ≤ 0.39). Four of the 7 vignettes had a substantial agreement on SSE classification (>80%; Gwet’s AC ≥ 0.80), and 3 had slight to moderate agreement (<70%, Gwet’s AC ≤ 0.78). Conclusions: Results demonstrated agreement and variability in determining deviation and SSE classification in the 7 vignettes. Although the SSE methodology and metric used by participant pediatric hospitals yields generally similar review results, one must be cautious in using the SSE rate to compare patient safety outcomes across different hospitals.","PeriodicalId":343243,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Quality and Safety","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Quality and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hospitals have no standard for measuring comparative rates of serious safety events (SSE). A pediatric hospital safety collaborative has used a common definition and measurement system to classify SSE and calculate a serious safety event rate. An opportunity exists to evaluate the use of this measurement system. Methods: A web-based survey utilizing 7 case vignettes was sent to 132 network hospitals to assess agreement in classifying the vignettes as SSEs. Respondents classified the vignettes according to the taxonomy used at their respective organizations for deviations and SSE classification. Results: Of the 82 respondents, 67 (82%) utilized the same SSE classification system. Respondents did not assess deviations for 2 of the 7 vignettes, which had clear deviations. Of the remaining 5 vignettes, 3 had a substantial agreement of deviation (>85%, Gwet’s AC ≥ 0.68), and 2 had fair agreement (<70%, Gwet’s AC ≤ 0.39). Four of the 7 vignettes had a substantial agreement on SSE classification (>80%; Gwet’s AC ≥ 0.80), and 3 had slight to moderate agreement (<70%, Gwet’s AC ≤ 0.78). Conclusions: Results demonstrated agreement and variability in determining deviation and SSE classification in the 7 vignettes. Although the SSE methodology and metric used by participant pediatric hospitals yields generally similar review results, one must be cautious in using the SSE rate to compare patient safety outcomes across different hospitals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童医院严重安全事件分类差异:一种比较指标?
医院没有衡量严重安全事件(SSE)比较率的标准。某儿科医院安全协作使用通用的定义和测量系统对SSE进行分类,并计算严重安全事件发生率。有机会对该测量系统的使用进行评估。方法:采用网络调查的方法,对132家网络医院的7个病例进行调查,以评估对这些病例进行ssi分类的一致性。受访者根据各自组织使用的偏差分类和SSE分类对小插曲进行分类。结果:在82名受访者中,67人(82%)使用相同的SSE分类系统。被调查者没有对7个小插曲中的2个进行偏差评估,这些小插曲有明显的偏差。在剩余的5个样本中,3个样本的偏差一致性较好(>85%,Gwet’s AC≥0.68),2个样本的偏差一致性较好(80%;Gwet的AC≥0.80),3例有轻度至中度一致(<70%,Gwet的AC≤0.78)。结论:结果表明,在确定偏差和SSE分类的7个小片段的一致性和可变性。虽然参与调查的儿科医院使用的SSE方法和指标产生了大致相似的评价结果,但在使用SSE率来比较不同医院的患者安全结果时必须谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving Wait Times for Children with Caregivers with Limited English Proficiency in the Emergency Department Utilizing Clinical Decision Support in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection across a Large Pediatric Primary Care Network Pediatric Inpatient Leaders, Views Changed with COVID-19: A Call to Re-engage in Quality Improvement Qualitative Study on Safe and Effective Handover Information during a Rapid Response Team Encounter New strategies to Reduce Unnecessary Antibiotic Use in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1