Incentives to Fake Reviews in Online Platforms

G. Saraiva
{"title":"Incentives to Fake Reviews in Online Platforms","authors":"G. Saraiva","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3538894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the proliferation of online rating platforms, there has been an increasing concern over the authenticity of reviews posted online. This paper develops a theoretical framework to study sellers' incentives to solicit fake reviews in online rating platforms, and provides empirical evidence supporting some of the model's conclusions. The model predicts that sellers' optimal investment in fake reviews is not a monotone function of their reputation, with sellers with either a very good or very bad history of past reviews displaying less incentives to fake reviews. Another prediction from the model is that, in order to maximize the impact from each fake review, sellers tend to concentrate review manipulation at the initial stages following their entrance (or reentered with a new name) into the market. Using data collected from Amazon, I was able to observe those features from the model at the empirical level by estimating the probability of a review being fake as a function of the product's reputation and the time it took for the review to be posted since the seller entered the market.","PeriodicalId":370988,"journal":{"name":"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3538894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the proliferation of online rating platforms, there has been an increasing concern over the authenticity of reviews posted online. This paper develops a theoretical framework to study sellers' incentives to solicit fake reviews in online rating platforms, and provides empirical evidence supporting some of the model's conclusions. The model predicts that sellers' optimal investment in fake reviews is not a monotone function of their reputation, with sellers with either a very good or very bad history of past reviews displaying less incentives to fake reviews. Another prediction from the model is that, in order to maximize the impact from each fake review, sellers tend to concentrate review manipulation at the initial stages following their entrance (or reentered with a new name) into the market. Using data collected from Amazon, I was able to observe those features from the model at the empirical level by estimating the probability of a review being fake as a function of the product's reputation and the time it took for the review to be posted since the seller entered the market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线平台虚假评论的动机
随着在线评价平台的激增,人们越来越关注网上评论的真实性。本文开发了一个理论框架来研究卖家在在线评级平台上征求虚假评论的动机,并提供了实证证据来支持模型的一些结论。该模型预测,卖家对虚假评论的最优投资并不是他们声誉的单调函数,过去评论历史非常好或非常差的卖家对虚假评论的动机更小。该模型的另一个预测是,为了最大化每个虚假评论的影响,卖家倾向于在进入(或以新名称重新进入)市场后的初始阶段集中评论操纵。使用从亚马逊收集的数据,我能够在经验层面上从模型中观察到这些特征,通过估计评论是假的概率作为产品声誉的函数,以及卖家进入市场后评论发布的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advertising as Information for Ranking E-Commerce Search Listings Adaptive Price Mechanism and a Sequential Reverse Auction Model in Social Commerce Asymmetric Network Effects in the Integration of Digital Platforms Is COVID-19 Reshaping Consumer Buying Behavior? Understanding the Problems and Issues of Online Purchase in Nepal The Pricing Strategies of Online Grocery Retailers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1