PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN DAN PENGGELAPAN DI POLRESTABES MEDAN (The Implementation of Restorative Justice in The Settlement of Criminal Crimes of Fraud and Embezzlement at the Polrestabes Medan)

Olma Fridoki, Alvi Syahrin, Sunarmi, Marlina
{"title":"PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN DAN PENGGELAPAN DI POLRESTABES MEDAN (The Implementation of Restorative Justice in The Settlement of Criminal Crimes of Fraud and Embezzlement at the Polrestabes Medan)","authors":"Olma Fridoki, Alvi Syahrin, Sunarmi, Marlina","doi":"10.34010/rnlj.v4i1.4679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the implementation of restorative justice or settlement of cases outside the court, there are no longer any minor criminal cases, but also include cases such as humiliation, persecution, fraud and embezzlement, negligence resulting in injuries, unpleasant acts, even theft, and gambling. The ultimate goal of this restorative concept hopes to reduce the number of prisoners in prison; removing stigma or labels and returning criminals to normal human beings; criminals can realize their mistakes, so they do not repeat their actions and reduce the workload of the police, prosecutors, detention centers, courts, and correctional institutions; saving state finances does not cause resentment because the perpetrator has been forgiven by the victim, the victim quickly gets compensation; empowering the community in overcoming crime, and reintegrating criminals into society. The problems, namely: settlement through restorative justice eliminates criminal acts, or not. This research is normative legal research. The results showed that: Settlement of criminal cases of fraud and embezzlement through restorative justice does not eliminate criminal acts. It is recommended that the criminal policy for settlement of cases should be changed not to retaliate but to restore the losses incurred for the parties in litigation.","PeriodicalId":325192,"journal":{"name":"Res Nullius Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res Nullius Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34010/rnlj.v4i1.4679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the implementation of restorative justice or settlement of cases outside the court, there are no longer any minor criminal cases, but also include cases such as humiliation, persecution, fraud and embezzlement, negligence resulting in injuries, unpleasant acts, even theft, and gambling. The ultimate goal of this restorative concept hopes to reduce the number of prisoners in prison; removing stigma or labels and returning criminals to normal human beings; criminals can realize their mistakes, so they do not repeat their actions and reduce the workload of the police, prosecutors, detention centers, courts, and correctional institutions; saving state finances does not cause resentment because the perpetrator has been forgiven by the victim, the victim quickly gets compensation; empowering the community in overcoming crime, and reintegrating criminals into society. The problems, namely: settlement through restorative justice eliminates criminal acts, or not. This research is normative legal research. The results showed that: Settlement of criminal cases of fraud and embezzlement through restorative justice does not eliminate criminal acts. It is recommended that the criminal policy for settlement of cases should be changed not to retaliate but to restore the losses incurred for the parties in litigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在执行恢复性司法或庭外和解案件中,不再有任何轻微的刑事案件,还包括侮辱、迫害、欺诈和贪污、疏忽造成伤害、不愉快的行为,甚至盗窃、赌博等案件。这一恢复性概念的最终目标是希望减少监狱中的囚犯数量;消除耻辱或标签,使罪犯回归正常人类;罪犯可以认识到自己的错误,从而不再重蹈覆辙,减少警察、检察官、看守所、法院和惩教机构的工作量;拯救国家财政不会引起怨恨,因为加害者已经得到了受害者的原谅,受害者很快就得到了赔偿;增强社区战胜犯罪的能力,使罪犯重新融入社会。问题,即:通过恢复性司法解决是否消除了犯罪行为。本研究属于规范法学研究。结果表明:通过恢复性司法解决诈骗和贪污犯罪案件并不能消除犯罪行为。建议改变刑事和解政策,不是为了报复,而是为了赔偿诉讼当事人所遭受的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PENERAPAN PRINSIP AKUNTABILITAS DALAM INDEPENDENSI HAKIM DI INDONESIA KEPASTIAN HUKUM PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN KERJA ANTARA TENAGA KERJA INDONESIA YANG BEKERJA DI KEDUTAAN ASING BERDASARKAN PRANATA HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN PELINDUNGAN HUKUM MEREK PADA DEEP LINKING DI INDONESIA PERAN BALAI PEMASYARAKATAN KELAS II SERANG DALAM PELAKSANAAN DIVERSI PADA PERKARA PIDANA ANAK IMPLEMENTASI HAK PARTISIPASI PEMUDA DALAM PEMERINTAHAN DESA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1