ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PADA MATERI POLA BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA SMP AHMAD DAHLAN METRO

B. Santoso, Lena Wahyuni, Ma’rifatun Nikmah, Miftah Qurrahman Mu’afii, Nur Rahmah Lutfiah
{"title":"ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PADA MATERI POLA BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA SMP AHMAD DAHLAN METRO","authors":"B. Santoso, Lena Wahyuni, Ma’rifatun Nikmah, Miftah Qurrahman Mu’afii, Nur Rahmah Lutfiah","doi":"10.59098/mega.v1i1.176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze students' mistakes in solving problems in the material number patterns. In this study, researchers used a quantitative descriptive method. Data collection techniques in this study were carried out through several stages, namely: Observation and Test. Researchers used the test in the form of essay questions as many as 4 items related to material number patterns by emphasizing the students' mathematical communication skills. Where the indicator of the problem is students are able to express opinions and state the situation there are questions number 1 parts a and b, state the situation, pictures, diagrams, or real objects into language, symbols, ideas or models number 2 parts c and d. From the indicators above the researcher determines the assessment instrument, where the researcher uses the guidelines Research methods based on the philosophy of postpositivist, this method is used to examine the condition of natural objects such as student communication skills, as a research instrument this sampling uses categories with levels of student mathematical communication skills, then selected 3 levels of student abilities are: high, medium, and low ability with the provisions of low <40, medium 40-70 and high> 70. The researcher can conclude that know the percentage of the average student answer error in each question is 48, 3% in problem 1a and get the same result in Problem 1b is 48.3%, then the lowest result in Problem 2c is 13.3% and Problem 2d is 26.6%, it can be concluded that the average error of students in answering the whole essay item is 34% or it can be said to be low where the students' mistakes in me solve the material number essay problem.","PeriodicalId":153921,"journal":{"name":"MEGA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEGA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59098/mega.v1i1.176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze students' mistakes in solving problems in the material number patterns. In this study, researchers used a quantitative descriptive method. Data collection techniques in this study were carried out through several stages, namely: Observation and Test. Researchers used the test in the form of essay questions as many as 4 items related to material number patterns by emphasizing the students' mathematical communication skills. Where the indicator of the problem is students are able to express opinions and state the situation there are questions number 1 parts a and b, state the situation, pictures, diagrams, or real objects into language, symbols, ideas or models number 2 parts c and d. From the indicators above the researcher determines the assessment instrument, where the researcher uses the guidelines Research methods based on the philosophy of postpositivist, this method is used to examine the condition of natural objects such as student communication skills, as a research instrument this sampling uses categories with levels of student mathematical communication skills, then selected 3 levels of student abilities are: high, medium, and low ability with the provisions of low <40, medium 40-70 and high> 70. The researcher can conclude that know the percentage of the average student answer error in each question is 48, 3% in problem 1a and get the same result in Problem 1b is 48.3%, then the lowest result in Problem 2c is 13.3% and Problem 2d is 26.6%, it can be concluded that the average error of students in answering the whole essay item is 34% or it can be said to be low where the students' mistakes in me solve the material number essay problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生在解决数字模式材料问题上的错误分析是由初中数学学生AHMAD DAHLAN METRO的数学沟通能力所决定的
本研究的目的是分析学生在材料数字模式解题时的错误。在本研究中,研究者采用了定量描述的方法。本研究的数据收集技术分为几个阶段,即:观察和测试。研究人员通过强调学生的数学沟通能力,以多达4个与材料数字模式相关的论文问题的形式进行了测试。其中问题的指标是学生能够表达意见和陈述的情况有问题1部分a和b,陈述的情况,图片,图表,或实物成语言,符号,思想或模型2部分c和d.从上述指标研究者确定的评估工具,其中研究者使用的指导方针研究方法基于后实证主义的哲学,该方法用于检查学生沟通能力等自然对象的状况,作为一种研究工具,该抽样使用学生数学沟通能力水平的类别,然后选择3个级别的学生能力:高,中,低能力,规定低70。研究者可以得出这样的结论:知道的比例平均学生错误在每一个问题的回答是48,3%在问题1和问题1中得到同样的结果b是48.3%,然后导致问题2摄氏度最低是13.3%和2 d问题是26.6%,它可以得出结论,学生回答整个文章的平均误差项是34%或可以说很低,学生的错误在我解决材料号论文问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN KONEKSI MATEMATIKA DAN MINAT BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP MUHAMMADIYAH KUPANG DENGAN MODEL PMRI PENGARUH MEDIA DAKON MATEMATIKA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA MATERI PENJUMLAHAN ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL MATEMATIKA MODEL PISSA PADA SISWA SMP PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA MODEL PROBLEM POSING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MATEMATIS SISWA DI SMP NEGERI MANDALA ANALISIS PROSES BERPIKIR PROBABILISTIK SISWA DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD DEPENDENT-FIELD INDEPENDENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1