Mental Illness Stigma in Turkish and Greek Cypriot Communities Living in Cyprus: A Pilot Study

A. Zorba
{"title":"Mental Illness Stigma in Turkish and Greek Cypriot Communities Living in Cyprus: A Pilot Study","authors":"A. Zorba","doi":"10.15405/EJSBS.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1.IntroductionPublic stigma has been defined by Corrigan, Rowan, Green, Lundin, River, Uphoff-Wasowski, White, and Kubiac, (2003) as a status loss and discrimination of individuals with mental health problems due to negative prejudice from the general public. Norman, Sorrentino, Gawronski, Szeto, Ye and Windell (2010) further explained stigma as a complex process that is cognitive and behavioural which takes place between the general public and mentally ill individuals. Stereotypes refer to the beliefs that are negative and associated with mentally ill individuals such as dangerousness and unpredictability (public stigma) and incompetency (self-stigma) (Pingani, Forghieri, Ferrari, Ben-Zeev, Artoni, Mazzi, and Corrigan, 2011). Prejudice, such as fear (public stigma) and low self-esteem (self-stigma) are cognitive and emotional responses that are activated by the stereotypes. These may then lead to discrimination, which is a behavioural response to prejudice; not employing someone due to his or her mental health problem (public stigma) or not applying for a job due to having a mental illness (self stigma).Two main theoretical models on stigma have been developed in an effort to explain how it forms; labelling (Link et al., 1987) and attribution theories (Corrigan, 2000). Scheff's original theory of labelling suggested that stereotypes about mental illness are learnt at an early age through social interactions and media, which are then internalized and applied to self in the case of mental illness. Individuals diagnosed with mental illness are aware of these roles that expected from them by the public, they therefore, start acting in such way. According to this theory, once someone is diagnosed with mental illness a new identity of a \"psychiatric patient\" and a social status is created for that individual. Stigma is then formed which is expressed as labelled individual being excluded form the daily interactions (Link et al., 1987). Another theory that sought to understand the stigma of mental illness is attribution theory (Heider, 1958). Corrigan (2000) developed Weiner's original attribution theory and applied it specifically to stigma of mental illness. According to him, there are 3 constructs of mental illness stigma; signalling event, cognitive and affective responses and behavioural reaction. There are signals such as poor social skills, which may indicate that there may be something unusual or alarming about the individual. Similar to Weiner, Corrigan also suggested that if the illness is attributed to an external factor the person is more likely to receive pity, therefore, help and less negative attitudes. This is opposite for those who are held responsible for their illness which in turn receive more anger and punishing behaviour consequently more stigma.Furthermore, a widely used social-psychology model has further been developed which adopted aspects from both attribution and labelling theories (Angermeyer and Matschinger, 2003, Angermeyer, Matschinger and Corrigan, 2003; Corrigan, Edwards, Green, A., Diwan, and Penn , 2001). Corrigan et al., (2000) suggested that this model claims that stigmatizing attitudes are constructed due to ones previous experience and knowledge which then leads to a behavioural response. A casual pathway model consists of experience, perception, affect and response (See Figure 1).In detail, this model considers perceptions and affects as attribution, which in turn results in discrimination as a behavioural response (Emmerton, 2010). Unlike the labelling and the attribution theories this model also considers other factors, which are identified as contributors to the stigma of mental illness; demographics and familiarity.According to the researchers stigma commonly results in economical, personal, political and social challenges for those who have such health conditions (Halter, 2008). Attitudes that are stigmatizing may also result in discriminative behaviour; restriction of someone's everyday life practices as well as prospects in public and private institutions. …","PeriodicalId":164632,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15405/EJSBS.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

1.IntroductionPublic stigma has been defined by Corrigan, Rowan, Green, Lundin, River, Uphoff-Wasowski, White, and Kubiac, (2003) as a status loss and discrimination of individuals with mental health problems due to negative prejudice from the general public. Norman, Sorrentino, Gawronski, Szeto, Ye and Windell (2010) further explained stigma as a complex process that is cognitive and behavioural which takes place between the general public and mentally ill individuals. Stereotypes refer to the beliefs that are negative and associated with mentally ill individuals such as dangerousness and unpredictability (public stigma) and incompetency (self-stigma) (Pingani, Forghieri, Ferrari, Ben-Zeev, Artoni, Mazzi, and Corrigan, 2011). Prejudice, such as fear (public stigma) and low self-esteem (self-stigma) are cognitive and emotional responses that are activated by the stereotypes. These may then lead to discrimination, which is a behavioural response to prejudice; not employing someone due to his or her mental health problem (public stigma) or not applying for a job due to having a mental illness (self stigma).Two main theoretical models on stigma have been developed in an effort to explain how it forms; labelling (Link et al., 1987) and attribution theories (Corrigan, 2000). Scheff's original theory of labelling suggested that stereotypes about mental illness are learnt at an early age through social interactions and media, which are then internalized and applied to self in the case of mental illness. Individuals diagnosed with mental illness are aware of these roles that expected from them by the public, they therefore, start acting in such way. According to this theory, once someone is diagnosed with mental illness a new identity of a "psychiatric patient" and a social status is created for that individual. Stigma is then formed which is expressed as labelled individual being excluded form the daily interactions (Link et al., 1987). Another theory that sought to understand the stigma of mental illness is attribution theory (Heider, 1958). Corrigan (2000) developed Weiner's original attribution theory and applied it specifically to stigma of mental illness. According to him, there are 3 constructs of mental illness stigma; signalling event, cognitive and affective responses and behavioural reaction. There are signals such as poor social skills, which may indicate that there may be something unusual or alarming about the individual. Similar to Weiner, Corrigan also suggested that if the illness is attributed to an external factor the person is more likely to receive pity, therefore, help and less negative attitudes. This is opposite for those who are held responsible for their illness which in turn receive more anger and punishing behaviour consequently more stigma.Furthermore, a widely used social-psychology model has further been developed which adopted aspects from both attribution and labelling theories (Angermeyer and Matschinger, 2003, Angermeyer, Matschinger and Corrigan, 2003; Corrigan, Edwards, Green, A., Diwan, and Penn , 2001). Corrigan et al., (2000) suggested that this model claims that stigmatizing attitudes are constructed due to ones previous experience and knowledge which then leads to a behavioural response. A casual pathway model consists of experience, perception, affect and response (See Figure 1).In detail, this model considers perceptions and affects as attribution, which in turn results in discrimination as a behavioural response (Emmerton, 2010). Unlike the labelling and the attribution theories this model also considers other factors, which are identified as contributors to the stigma of mental illness; demographics and familiarity.According to the researchers stigma commonly results in economical, personal, political and social challenges for those who have such health conditions (Halter, 2008). Attitudes that are stigmatizing may also result in discriminative behaviour; restriction of someone's everyday life practices as well as prospects in public and private institutions. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
居住在塞浦路斯的土耳其族和希族塞人社区的精神疾病耻辱:一项试点研究
1.Corrigan, Rowan, Green, Lundin, River, Uphoff-Wasowski, White和Kubiac(2003)将公众耻辱感定义为由于公众的负面偏见而导致心理健康问题个体的地位丧失和歧视。Norman、Sorrentino、Gawronski、Szeto、Ye和Windell(2010)进一步解释了病耻感是一个复杂的认知和行为过程,发生在公众和精神病患者之间。刻板印象是指与精神病患者有关的负面信念,如危险性和不可预测性(公众耻辱感)和无能性(自我耻辱感)(Pingani, Forghieri, Ferrari, Ben-Zeev, Artoni, Mazzi, and Corrigan, 2011)。偏见,如恐惧(公众耻辱感)和自卑(自我耻辱感)是由刻板印象激活的认知和情绪反应。这些可能会导致歧视,这是对偏见的行为反应;由于某人的精神健康问题而不雇用某人(公众耻辱)或由于患有精神疾病而不申请工作(自我耻辱)。关于柱头的两个主要理论模型已经发展起来,试图解释它是如何形成的;标签(Link et al., 1987)和归因理论(Corrigan, 2000)。Scheff最初的标签理论认为,关于精神疾病的刻板印象是在早期通过社会互动和媒体习得的,然后内化并应用于精神疾病的自我。被诊断患有精神疾病的人意识到公众对他们的期望,因此,他们开始以这种方式行事。根据这个理论,一旦一个人被诊断出患有精神疾病,他就会有一个新的“精神病人”的身份和社会地位。然后形成耻辱感,表现为被标记的个体被排除在日常互动之外(Link et al., 1987)。另一个试图理解精神疾病耻辱的理论是归因理论(Heider, 1958)。Corrigan(2000)发展了Weiner最初的归因理论,并将其专门应用于精神疾病的污名化。他认为,精神疾病耻感有三种构念;信号事件,认知和情感反应和行为反应。还有一些信号,比如社交技能差,这可能表明这个人可能有些不寻常或令人担忧。与韦纳类似,科里根也认为,如果疾病是由外部因素引起的,那么这个人更有可能得到同情,因此,帮助和更少的消极态度。对于那些为自己的疾病负责的人来说,情况恰恰相反,他们反过来会受到更多的愤怒和惩罚行为,从而受到更多的污名。此外,一个广泛使用的社会心理学模型进一步发展,该模型采用了归因和标签理论的各个方面(Angermeyer和Matschinger, 2003; Angermeyer, Matschinger和Corrigan, 2003;Corrigan, Edwards, Green, A., Diwan, and Penn, 2001)。Corrigan等人(2000)认为,该模型认为,污名化的态度是由先前的经验和知识构建的,然后导致行为反应。休闲路径模型由经验、感知、影响和反应组成(见图1)。该模型将感知和影响视为归因,进而导致歧视作为一种行为反应(Emmerton, 2010)。与标签理论和归因理论不同,该模型还考虑了其他因素,这些因素被确定为导致精神疾病耻辱的因素;人口统计和熟悉度。根据研究人员的说法,耻辱通常会给那些有这种健康状况的人带来经济、个人、政治和社会挑战(Halter, 2008年)。污名化的态度也可能导致歧视行为;限制某人的日常生活行为以及在公共和私人机构的前景。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Attitude and Perceptions towards Basic Life Support Training among Student Teachers in a Malaysian University The Development of Artique - Independent Artists and Online Art Criticism Analysis of Personal-Professional Status of Women Managers for Sustainable School Management in Turkey Enforced Isolation: How does it affect the Psychosocial and Physical Development of Children? Online Assessment: How Effectively Do They Measure Student Learning at the Tertiary Level?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1