Do Levels of the Platelet Activation Markers sCD40 L and SCUBE 1 Differ between Laboratory-Confirmed and Clinically Diagnosed COVID-19 Patients?

Özkan G, Bayrakçi N, Mutlu Lc, Erdem I, Tuna N, D. m., Yildirim I, Erdal B, çelikkol A, Y. a, Güzel S
{"title":"Do Levels of the Platelet Activation Markers sCD40 L and SCUBE 1 Differ between Laboratory-Confirmed and Clinically Diagnosed COVID-19 Patients?","authors":"Özkan G, Bayrakçi N, Mutlu Lc, Erdem I, Tuna N, D. m., Yildirim I, Erdal B, çelikkol A, Y. a, Güzel S","doi":"10.26420/thrombhaemostres.2022.1084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Thromboembolic complications are an important cause of mortality and morbidity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. The purpose of this study was to compare levels of the platelet activation markers soluble CD40 ligand (sCD 40L) and signal peptide-CUB-EGF domain-containing protein 1 (SCUBE 1) and hematological parameters between laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 patients. No previous studies have investigated levels of these markers in laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 patients. Material and Method: Fifty-one laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 patients with no exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Blood specimens were collected for SCUBE1, sCD40 L, and hematological and biochemical parameter measurement. These parameters from laboratoryconfirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 patients were then compared. Results: SCUBE1 and sCD40L levels were significantly higher in the laboratory-confirmed group compared to the clinically diagnosed group (p<0.05 and p =0.005, respectively). Time elapsing between onset of symptoms and presentation to hospital was significantly shorter in the laboratory-confirmed group, while rates of contact with COVID-19 patients were significantly higher (p <0.001 and p <0.005, respectively). SCUBE 1 levels were significantly negatively correlated with ferritin and C-reactive protein (CRP) (p< 0.05, r= - 0.322 and p< 0.05, r= - 0.351, respectively). Conclusion: This study shows, for the first time in the literature, that levels of the platelet activation markers SCUBE1 and sCD40L are significantly higher in laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients compared to clinically diagnosed individuals.","PeriodicalId":246370,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis &amp; Haemostasis: Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis &amp; Haemostasis: Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/thrombhaemostres.2022.1084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Thromboembolic complications are an important cause of mortality and morbidity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. The purpose of this study was to compare levels of the platelet activation markers soluble CD40 ligand (sCD 40L) and signal peptide-CUB-EGF domain-containing protein 1 (SCUBE 1) and hematological parameters between laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 patients. No previous studies have investigated levels of these markers in laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 patients. Material and Method: Fifty-one laboratory-confirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 patients with no exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Blood specimens were collected for SCUBE1, sCD40 L, and hematological and biochemical parameter measurement. These parameters from laboratoryconfirmed and clinically diagnosed COVID-19 patients were then compared. Results: SCUBE1 and sCD40L levels were significantly higher in the laboratory-confirmed group compared to the clinically diagnosed group (p<0.05 and p =0.005, respectively). Time elapsing between onset of symptoms and presentation to hospital was significantly shorter in the laboratory-confirmed group, while rates of contact with COVID-19 patients were significantly higher (p <0.001 and p <0.005, respectively). SCUBE 1 levels were significantly negatively correlated with ferritin and C-reactive protein (CRP) (p< 0.05, r= - 0.322 and p< 0.05, r= - 0.351, respectively). Conclusion: This study shows, for the first time in the literature, that levels of the platelet activation markers SCUBE1 and sCD40L are significantly higher in laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients compared to clinically diagnosed individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血小板活化标志物scd40l和sccube 1水平在实验室确诊和临床诊断的COVID-19患者中是否存在差异?
目的:血栓栓塞并发症是2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者死亡和发病的重要原因。本研究的目的是比较实验室确诊和临床诊断的COVID-19患者血小板活化标志物可溶性CD40配体(scd40l)和信号肽- cub - egf结构域蛋白1 (SCUBE 1)水平和血液学参数。此前没有研究调查实验室确诊和临床诊断的COVID-19患者中这些标志物的水平。材料与方法:51例无排除标准的实验室确诊和临床诊断的COVID-19患者纳入研究。采集血样进行SCUBE1、sCD40 L检测,并进行血液学及生化参数测定。然后比较实验室确诊和临床诊断的COVID-19患者的这些参数。结果:实验室确诊组SCUBE1、sCD40L水平明显高于临床诊断组(p<0.05、p =0.005)。实验室确诊组出现症状到入院的时间明显较短,与COVID-19患者的接触率明显较高(分别为p <0.001和p <0.005)。SCUBE 1水平与铁蛋白、c反应蛋白(CRP)呈显著负相关(p< 0.05, r= - 0.322和p< 0.05, r= - 0.351)。结论:本研究首次在文献中发现,实验室确诊的COVID-19患者血小板活化标志物SCUBE1和sCD40L水平明显高于临床诊断个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Levels of the Platelet Activation Markers sCD40 L and SCUBE 1 Differ between Laboratory-Confirmed and Clinically Diagnosed COVID-19 Patients? A Novel Mutation Case of Type 3 Von Willebrand Disease Misdiagnosed as Hemophilia A Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Adults at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital Laboratory Diagnosis and Classification of Von Willebrand Disease: A Review Analytical Approaches to Wound Healing Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1