Professional personality strain markers in the staff of the criminal executive system of different departments

Anna N. Zelyanina
{"title":"Professional personality strain markers in the staff of the criminal executive system of different departments","authors":"Anna N. Zelyanina","doi":"10.2991/ispcpep-19.2019.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the markers of professional personal deformation and describes the features of their manifestation in the staff of the penitentiary system with different content of professional tasks (department staff and employees who work directly with suspects, accused, convicted). It was attended by 70 employees (men) aged 22 to 49 years old. The study used the following psychodiagnostic methods: questionnaire \"Professional (emotional) burnout (MBI)\" adaptation N.Е. Vodopianova; W. Cook's hostility scale D. Medley; personal questionnaire G. Shmisheka; Methods of multilateral personality research in the modification of Berezin FB; Individually typological questionnaire (L. Sobchik), and also questioning. Frequency analysis of the answers of respondents obtained through the use of the author's questionnaire showed that the majority of employees use obscene expressions when communicating at work and can communicate roughly. Some employees consider it acceptable for them to use physical force and swear words in relation to the special contingent, to violate legal norms for the sake of their personal goals. Comparative analysis of the severity of professional personal deformation markers among the staff of the penitentiary system performing various professional tasks showed that the security department tends to reduce achievements (negative evaluation of its activities, its success, decrease in work motivation) more than the regime department. They are also less sensitive, sentimental, more suspicious, prone to cautious thinking about their own and other people's actions than the staff of the regime department. The department of the regime has less emotional coloring of behavior, their social contacts may differ in formality.","PeriodicalId":204028,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the II International Scientific-Practical Conference \"Psychology of Extreme Professions\" (ISPCPEP 2019)","volume":"122 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the II International Scientific-Practical Conference \"Psychology of Extreme Professions\" (ISPCPEP 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ispcpep-19.2019.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the markers of professional personal deformation and describes the features of their manifestation in the staff of the penitentiary system with different content of professional tasks (department staff and employees who work directly with suspects, accused, convicted). It was attended by 70 employees (men) aged 22 to 49 years old. The study used the following psychodiagnostic methods: questionnaire "Professional (emotional) burnout (MBI)" adaptation N.Е. Vodopianova; W. Cook's hostility scale D. Medley; personal questionnaire G. Shmisheka; Methods of multilateral personality research in the modification of Berezin FB; Individually typological questionnaire (L. Sobchik), and also questioning. Frequency analysis of the answers of respondents obtained through the use of the author's questionnaire showed that the majority of employees use obscene expressions when communicating at work and can communicate roughly. Some employees consider it acceptable for them to use physical force and swear words in relation to the special contingent, to violate legal norms for the sake of their personal goals. Comparative analysis of the severity of professional personal deformation markers among the staff of the penitentiary system performing various professional tasks showed that the security department tends to reduce achievements (negative evaluation of its activities, its success, decrease in work motivation) more than the regime department. They are also less sensitive, sentimental, more suspicious, prone to cautious thinking about their own and other people's actions than the staff of the regime department. The department of the regime has less emotional coloring of behavior, their social contacts may differ in formality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同部门刑事执行系统工作人员职业人格紧张标记
本文分析了职业人格变形的标志,描述了其在不同职业任务内容的监狱系统工作人员(部门工作人员和直接接触犯罪嫌疑人、被告人、被定罪人员的工作人员)中的表现特征。有70名员工(男性)参加,年龄在22岁至49岁之间。本研究采用以下心理诊断方法:问卷调查“职业(情绪)倦怠(MBI)”适应N.Е。Vodopianova;W. Cook的敌意量表;个人问卷G. Shmisheka;《Berezin FB》修改中的多边人格研究方法个体类型调查问卷(L. Sobchik),以及提问。通过使用作者的问卷,对被调查者的回答进行频率分析,发现大多数员工在工作中交流时使用淫秽的表达,可以进行粗略的交流。有些员工认为,为了实现个人目标,在与特种部队有关的问题上使用武力和骂人是可以接受的,违反法律规范也是可以接受的。对执行各种专业任务的监狱系统工作人员职业人格变形标记严重程度的对比分析表明,警卫部门比政权部门更倾向于降低成就(对其活动的负面评价,其成功,工作动机下降)。与政权部门的工作人员相比,他们也不那么敏感、多愁善感、多疑,倾向于谨慎地思考自己和他人的行为。政权部门的行为没有太多的情感色彩,他们的社会交往可能在形式上有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Occupational risks of personal deformities and psychological distress of evening school teachers Interrelation Between Life Quality Assessment and the Functional Status Indicators of the Organism Basic Systems of Students of Higher Education Institution of Emercom of Russia Specifics of Demographic Development of Arctic Regions as a Determining Factor of Social Management System Development Evaluation Human factor as a cause of aircraft accidents The Factors of Mental Maladjustment of Law Enforcement Officers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1