Sarkasme Politik dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia

Aly Ubaid Arafi'i, Kun Budianto, Siti Anisyah
{"title":"Sarkasme Politik dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia","authors":"Aly Ubaid Arafi'i, Kun Budianto, Siti Anisyah","doi":"10.19109/jsipol.v1i3.14694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is entitled Political Sarcasm Against President Joko Widodo Period 2019 – 2024 on Twitter in a Human Rights Perspective. Freedom of expression is placed as a form of freedom in seeking information and then discussing whether to support or criticize it as a process to remove our misconceptions about facts and values. The use of sarcasm is considered as one of freedom of expression. In fact, the use of sarcasm on Twitter in criticizing Joko Widodo's government resulted in intervention and even imprisonment. This study aims to find out how political sarcasm is used against President Joko Widodo for the 2019 – 2024 period on Twitter from a human rights perspective. The theory used is the theory of freedom of expression according to Joel Feinberg which in his view states that there are limits to freedom of expression. The use of sarcasm was in an effort to criticize President Joko Widodo. There are sarcasm that are harsh and unpleasant to hear so that there are expressions of sarcasm on Twitter which end up in court because the tweets cause insults to individuals and religious groups. The use of sarcasm can be trapped by violations of the Articles of the ITE Law and can go beyond the limits of freedom of expression according to Joel Feinberg. \n Keywords: Political Sarcasm, Political Sarcasm, President Joko Widodo, Human Rights, Freedom of Expression.","PeriodicalId":166584,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Prodi Ilmu Politik","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Prodi Ilmu Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19109/jsipol.v1i3.14694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research is entitled Political Sarcasm Against President Joko Widodo Period 2019 – 2024 on Twitter in a Human Rights Perspective. Freedom of expression is placed as a form of freedom in seeking information and then discussing whether to support or criticize it as a process to remove our misconceptions about facts and values. The use of sarcasm is considered as one of freedom of expression. In fact, the use of sarcasm on Twitter in criticizing Joko Widodo's government resulted in intervention and even imprisonment. This study aims to find out how political sarcasm is used against President Joko Widodo for the 2019 – 2024 period on Twitter from a human rights perspective. The theory used is the theory of freedom of expression according to Joel Feinberg which in his view states that there are limits to freedom of expression. The use of sarcasm was in an effort to criticize President Joko Widodo. There are sarcasm that are harsh and unpleasant to hear so that there are expressions of sarcasm on Twitter which end up in court because the tweets cause insults to individuals and religious groups. The use of sarcasm can be trapped by violations of the Articles of the ITE Law and can go beyond the limits of freedom of expression according to Joel Feinberg.  Keywords: Political Sarcasm, Political Sarcasm, President Joko Widodo, Human Rights, Freedom of Expression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从人权的角度来看,政治上是讽刺的
这项研究的题目是《人权视角下的2019 - 2024年在推特上对佐科·维多多总统的政治讽刺》。言论自由被视为一种寻求信息的自由形式,然后讨论是支持还是批评它,这是一个消除我们对事实和价值观误解的过程。讽刺的使用被认为是一种言论自由。事实上,在推特上讽刺佐科·维多多(Joko Widodo)政府导致了干预甚至监禁。本研究旨在从人权的角度了解2019年至2024年期间,在推特上对总统佐科·维多多的政治讽刺是如何被使用的。所使用的理论是Joel Feinberg的言论自由理论,他认为言论自由是有限制的。使用讽刺是为了批评总统佐科·维多多。有些讽刺是刺耳的,听起来不愉快的,所以推特上有讽刺的表达,最终会上法庭,因为这些推文对个人和宗教团体造成了侮辱。根据Joel Feinberg的说法,讽刺的使用可能会违反ITE法律的条款,并且可能超出言论自由的限制。关键词:政治讽刺,政治讽刺,佐科·维多多总统,人权,言论自由
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategi Politik Nadiem Makarim dalam Mengembangkan Pendidikan Pencegahan Kecurangan oleh Bawaslu pada Pemungutan Suara Pemilu Partisipasi Politik Organisasi Karang Taruna dalam Pembangunan Infrastruktur Desa Potensi Konflik atas Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Peran Politik Tokoh Agama pada Pemilu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1