Domestication in the Theater of the Monstrous

M. Heyes
{"title":"Domestication in the Theater of the Monstrous","authors":"M. Heyes","doi":"10.58997/jgm.v1i1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholarship on monstrosity has often focused on those beings that produce fear, terror, anxiety, and other forms of unease. However, it is clear from the semantic range of the term “monster” that the category encompasses beings who evoke a wide range of emotions. I suggest that scholars have largely displaced first-person accounts of the monstrous and those accounts which do not rely upon horror or anxiety, and I propose a three-category system to correct this displacement. These categories draw from Derrida’s notion of the domestication of the monster and Žižek’s notion of a “fantasy screen” for the monstrous. These categories encourage further research, both between categories of the monstrous and categories that would not typically fit within this descriptor.","PeriodicalId":405772,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Gods and Monsters","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Gods and Monsters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58997/jgm.v1i1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholarship on monstrosity has often focused on those beings that produce fear, terror, anxiety, and other forms of unease. However, it is clear from the semantic range of the term “monster” that the category encompasses beings who evoke a wide range of emotions. I suggest that scholars have largely displaced first-person accounts of the monstrous and those accounts which do not rely upon horror or anxiety, and I propose a three-category system to correct this displacement. These categories draw from Derrida’s notion of the domestication of the monster and Žižek’s notion of a “fantasy screen” for the monstrous. These categories encourage further research, both between categories of the monstrous and categories that would not typically fit within this descriptor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《怪物剧场》中的驯化
关于怪物的学术研究通常集中在那些产生恐惧、恐惧、焦虑和其他形式的不安的生物上。然而,从“怪物”一词的语义范围来看,很明显,这一类别包含了能唤起广泛情感的生物。我认为学者们已经在很大程度上取代了对怪物的第一人称描述,以及那些不依赖于恐怖或焦虑的描述,我提出了一个三类系统来纠正这种取代。这些范畴来自德里达对怪物驯化的概念,以及Žižek对怪物的“幻想屏幕”的概念。这些类别鼓励进一步的研究,无论是在怪异的类别之间,还是在通常不适合这个描述符的类别之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prosthetic Gods, Projected Monsters Review of Christopher Bell. The Dalai Lama and the Nechung Oracle “I can’t shake the feeling that You must have saved me for something greater than this” Review of Suicide Forest Village Ghost Hunters' Demonic Encounters as Religious Experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1