The United States and Elections in Africa (2015–2018)

A. Urnov
{"title":"The United States and Elections in Africa (2015–2018)","authors":"A. Urnov","doi":"10.31132/2412-5717-2019-46-1-58-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a self-proclaimed “Global Leader” the United States have made “the assertion, advancement, support and defense of democracy” throughout the world one of the pillars of their foreign policy. This aim invariably figures in all Washington’s program documents pertaining to Africa. A major component of these efforts is an assistance to regular, free and fair elections.\n\nThe selection of arguments cited to justify such activities has been done skilfully. In each specific case it is emphasized that the United States do not side with any competing party, stand “above the battle”, work for the perfection of electoral process, defend the rights of opposition and rank and file votes, render material and technical help to national electoral committees. Sounds irreproachable.\n\nHowever, the real situation is different. The study of the US practical activities in this field allows to conclude that Washington has one-sidedly awarded itself a role of a judge and supervisor of developments related to elections in the sovereign countries of Africa, tries to control the ways they are prepared and conducted. These activities signify an interference into the internal affairs of African states. The scale and forms of such interference differ and is subjected to tasks the USA try to resolve in this or that country on the national, regional or global levels. However, everywhere it serves as an instrument of penetration and strengthening of the US influence, enhancing the US political presence in African countries.\n\nThe right of the US to perform this role is presented as indisputable. Sceptics are branded as opponents of democracy.\n\nThe author explores the US positions and activities connected with elections in Africa during the last years of B.Obama and first two years of D.Trump presidencies. He shows how their policy have been implemented on the continental level and in regard to several countries – South Sudan, Libya, Democratic Republic of Congo, Burundi, Rwanda, Nigeria, Somali, Kenya, Uganda.","PeriodicalId":286957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute for African Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Institute for African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2019-46-1-58-98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As a self-proclaimed “Global Leader” the United States have made “the assertion, advancement, support and defense of democracy” throughout the world one of the pillars of their foreign policy. This aim invariably figures in all Washington’s program documents pertaining to Africa. A major component of these efforts is an assistance to regular, free and fair elections. The selection of arguments cited to justify such activities has been done skilfully. In each specific case it is emphasized that the United States do not side with any competing party, stand “above the battle”, work for the perfection of electoral process, defend the rights of opposition and rank and file votes, render material and technical help to national electoral committees. Sounds irreproachable. However, the real situation is different. The study of the US practical activities in this field allows to conclude that Washington has one-sidedly awarded itself a role of a judge and supervisor of developments related to elections in the sovereign countries of Africa, tries to control the ways they are prepared and conducted. These activities signify an interference into the internal affairs of African states. The scale and forms of such interference differ and is subjected to tasks the USA try to resolve in this or that country on the national, regional or global levels. However, everywhere it serves as an instrument of penetration and strengthening of the US influence, enhancing the US political presence in African countries. The right of the US to perform this role is presented as indisputable. Sceptics are branded as opponents of democracy. The author explores the US positions and activities connected with elections in Africa during the last years of B.Obama and first two years of D.Trump presidencies. He shows how their policy have been implemented on the continental level and in regard to several countries – South Sudan, Libya, Democratic Republic of Congo, Burundi, Rwanda, Nigeria, Somali, Kenya, Uganda.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国与非洲选举(2015-2018)
作为一个自诩的“全球领袖”,美国把在世界范围内“主张、推进、支持和捍卫民主”作为其外交政策的支柱之一。这一目标始终出现在华盛顿有关非洲的所有计划文件中。这些努力的一个主要组成部分是协助定期、自由和公正的选举。为证明这些活动的正当性而选择的论据已经做得很巧妙。在每一个具体情况下,都强调美国不站在任何竞争政党一边,站在“战斗之上”,为完善选举程序而努力,捍卫反对派和普通选民的权利,向国家选举委员会提供物质和技术援助。听起来无可指责的。然而,实际情况是不同的。对美国在这一领域的实际活动的研究可以得出这样的结论:华盛顿片面地赋予自己一个法官和监督者的角色,监督与非洲主权国家选举有关的发展,试图控制他们准备和执行的方式。这些活动是对非洲国家内政的干涉。这种干涉的规模和形式各不相同,并受到美国试图在国家、地区或全球层面上解决这个或那个国家的任务的影响。然而,在任何地方,它都是渗透和加强美国影响力的工具,增强了美国在非洲国家的政治存在。美国扮演这一角色的权利被认为是无可争辩的。怀疑论者被贴上民主反对者的标签。作者探讨了美国在奥巴马总统任期的最后几年和特朗普总统任期的头两年与非洲选举有关的立场和活动。他展示了他们的政策是如何在非洲大陆层面实施的,并涉及到几个国家——南苏丹、利比亚、刚果民主共和国、布隆迪、卢旺达、尼日利亚、索马里、肯尼亚和乌干达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Living Standards in Sub–Saharan Africa: Current Situation and Stimulation of Growth Expounding the Diversity of African Construction of Fertility: the Yorùbá Example Prospects for the Development of Russian-African Cooperation in the Cultural and Humanitarian Sphere Sudan and South Sudan: Through the Deconstruction and Transformation of Power to its Evolution Keeping Financial System Clean: Suppressing Terrorist Infiltration of Money or Value Transfer Services in East Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1