Preemptive Rights in the System of Legal Advantages: Aspects of the Ratio

A. A. Dergunov
{"title":"Preemptive Rights in the System of Legal Advantages: Aspects of the Ratio","authors":"A. A. Dergunov","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2022.3.4.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he article analyses such an ambiguous legislative category as «preemptive right». The author of the article remarks that preemptive right is included in the system of legal advantages because it represents the opportunity to receive benefits that is legally fixed by the state. The author, taking a doctrinal system of legal advantages as an example, compares it with the elements that build this system. The author analyses the comparison of preemptive right with the privilege, the benefit, the immunity and the special legal procedure. The article emphasizes that the first three kinds of legal advantages serve as exemptions to this rule. Preemptive right and the special legal procedure, in their turns, are not exemptions from the rule. Rather they represent special rules that serve as addition to the main ones. Besides, the author expresses disagreement with the point of view that denies the autonomy of preemptive rule. According to this point, preemptive right is viewed as another kind of special legal procedure. The author emphasizes the qualities that are intrinsic to preemptive right and that allow to differentiate it from the special legal procedure and from its subtype – the special order. The article by purpose mentions numerous examples from the existing legislation. They illustrate the position of the author with respect to the place and the role of preemptive right in the system of legal advantages.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prologue: Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2022.3.4.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

he article analyses such an ambiguous legislative category as «preemptive right». The author of the article remarks that preemptive right is included in the system of legal advantages because it represents the opportunity to receive benefits that is legally fixed by the state. The author, taking a doctrinal system of legal advantages as an example, compares it with the elements that build this system. The author analyses the comparison of preemptive right with the privilege, the benefit, the immunity and the special legal procedure. The article emphasizes that the first three kinds of legal advantages serve as exemptions to this rule. Preemptive right and the special legal procedure, in their turns, are not exemptions from the rule. Rather they represent special rules that serve as addition to the main ones. Besides, the author expresses disagreement with the point of view that denies the autonomy of preemptive rule. According to this point, preemptive right is viewed as another kind of special legal procedure. The author emphasizes the qualities that are intrinsic to preemptive right and that allow to differentiate it from the special legal procedure and from its subtype – the special order. The article by purpose mentions numerous examples from the existing legislation. They illustrate the position of the author with respect to the place and the role of preemptive right in the system of legal advantages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律优势制度中的优先购买权:比例的几个方面
本文分析了“优先购买权”这一模糊的立法范畴。文章的作者认为,优先购买权之所以被纳入法律利益制度,是因为它代表了获得国家法律规定的利益的机会。笔者以法律利益理论体系为例,对其构成要件进行了比较。笔者分析了优先购买权与特权、利益、豁免和特殊法律程序的比较。文章强调,前三种法律利益可以作为这一规则的豁免。优先购买权和特殊法律程序也不是规则的豁免。相反,它们代表了作为主要规则的补充的特殊规则。此外,笔者对否认先占规则自主性的观点也表示了不同的看法。根据这一点,优先购买权被视为另一种特殊的法律程序。作者强调了优先购买权所固有的性质,使其能够区别于特殊法律程序及其亚型——特殊程序。这篇文章的目的是从现有立法中列举了许多例子。它们阐明了笔者对优先购买权在法律利益制度中的地位和作用的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Party Acts` Role and Significance in the Prosecutor's Supervision Implementation in the USSR in the 1920s-1930s SPECIALTY 12.00.15: A STATISTICAL STUDY OF SUBJECT MATTERS AND THE NUMBER OF DISSERTATIONS PRESENTED TO DEFENSE Electronic Investigation Technologies and Modern Format of Technical and Criminalistic Support for Criminal Cases Investigation ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION OF THE AIM OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ACTIVITY AND MEANS OF ITS ACHIEVEMENT To the Issue of Business Trips in Labour Law of the Russian Federation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1