Towards A True Afropolitanism: Reconstructing African Diasporic Identities

Chike Mgbeadichie, C. Okoye
{"title":"Towards A True Afropolitanism: Reconstructing African Diasporic Identities","authors":"Chike Mgbeadichie, C. Okoye","doi":"10.4314/ujah.v22i2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay redefines the idea of Afropolitanism lost in the world of identity and cultural studies. Defined by Taiye Selasi as a concept that studies persons of African descent who found home everywhere they lived, yet belonged nowhere, this paper holds an opposing view to this interpretation of Afropolitans. We argue that Afropolitans are African diaspora who are (un)consciously slanted to their root in a specific manner; they belong somewhere and the construction and reconstruction of their identity are tied to their root. To re-theorize Afropolitanism in this manner, this research examines Michael Kerr's idea of the post-modern self, showing a comparative account of the pseudo-self and the solid-self, in relation to the Afropolitan identity construction. The re-interpretation of James Clifford’s position on place and space and the examination of Cecil Blake’s ideology of belonging, root, and routes, are critical to my re-reading of the Afropolitan vibe. Although derived from theories of cultural hybridity, transnationalism, cosmopolitanism, and elective affinity, this paper demystifies Afropolitanism by showing how it differs remarkably from these theories in analyzing the underlying questions of frican identity and lived experience. Whilst lived experiences of African diaspora constitute part of the existence of the Afropolitan, we argue that the construction of the Afropolitan identity is not reliant on an acquired identity or lived experience but an ascribed identity and root. Okey Ndibe’s Never Look an American in the Eyes, will serve as the primary text for this analysis, and we conclude this research by articulating how Ndibe and other Afropolitan novelists manipulate culture, language, and race to reflect our position on Afropolitanism. ","PeriodicalId":298106,"journal":{"name":"UJAH: Unizik Journal of Arts and Humanities","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UJAH: Unizik Journal of Arts and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ujah.v22i2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay redefines the idea of Afropolitanism lost in the world of identity and cultural studies. Defined by Taiye Selasi as a concept that studies persons of African descent who found home everywhere they lived, yet belonged nowhere, this paper holds an opposing view to this interpretation of Afropolitans. We argue that Afropolitans are African diaspora who are (un)consciously slanted to their root in a specific manner; they belong somewhere and the construction and reconstruction of their identity are tied to their root. To re-theorize Afropolitanism in this manner, this research examines Michael Kerr's idea of the post-modern self, showing a comparative account of the pseudo-self and the solid-self, in relation to the Afropolitan identity construction. The re-interpretation of James Clifford’s position on place and space and the examination of Cecil Blake’s ideology of belonging, root, and routes, are critical to my re-reading of the Afropolitan vibe. Although derived from theories of cultural hybridity, transnationalism, cosmopolitanism, and elective affinity, this paper demystifies Afropolitanism by showing how it differs remarkably from these theories in analyzing the underlying questions of frican identity and lived experience. Whilst lived experiences of African diaspora constitute part of the existence of the Afropolitan, we argue that the construction of the Afropolitan identity is not reliant on an acquired identity or lived experience but an ascribed identity and root. Okey Ndibe’s Never Look an American in the Eyes, will serve as the primary text for this analysis, and we conclude this research by articulating how Ndibe and other Afropolitan novelists manipulate culture, language, and race to reflect our position on Afropolitanism. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向真正的非洲政治主义:重建非洲侨民身份
本文重新定义了在身份和文化研究的世界中丢失的非洲政治主义的概念。Taiye Selasi将其定义为一个研究非洲人后裔的概念,这些人在他们居住的任何地方都找到了家,但却不属于任何地方,本文对非洲人的这种解释持反对意见。我们认为,非洲人是散居在外的非洲人,他们(不)有意识地以一种特定的方式倾向于自己的根;他们属于某个地方,他们身份的建构和重建与他们的根源息息相关。为了以这种方式重新理论化非洲政治主义,本研究考察了迈克尔·克尔的后现代自我思想,展示了与非洲人身份建构有关的伪自我和实体自我的比较说明。对詹姆斯·克利福德关于地点和空间的立场的重新解读,以及对塞西尔·布莱克关于归属、根源和路线的意识形态的审视,对我重新解读非洲人的氛围至关重要。虽然源自文化混杂、跨国主义、世界主义和选择性亲和等理论,但本文通过展示它在分析非洲身份和生活经验的潜在问题时与这些理论的显著不同,揭开了非洲政治主义的神秘面纱。虽然非洲侨民的生活经历构成了非洲人存在的一部分,但我们认为非洲人身份的构建并不依赖于获得的身份或生活经验,而是归因于身份和根源。好的,恩迪贝的《永远不要直视美国人》将作为本分析的主要文本,我们通过阐明恩迪贝和其他非洲裔小说家如何操纵文化、语言和种族来反映我们对非洲裔主义的立场,从而得出本研究的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teilhardian Evolutionism: A philosophical reconsideration A discursive reading of ideology, dominance and resistance in political texts Translocation and migrants’ live-in experiences: A literary discourse on select novels Reminiscences of a legendary Nigerian art music composer and scholar, Dan Agu A government phonology analysis of assimilation in AnakỤ Igbo expressions: “ǹgịvụ” and “gbaa egbè”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1