Reliability in gate first and gate last ultra-thin-EOT gate stacks assessed with CV-eMSM BTI characterization

E. Bury, B. Kaczer, H. Arimura, M. T. Luque, L. Ragnarsson, P. Roussel, A. Veloso, S. Chew, M. Togo, T. Schram, G. Groeseneken
{"title":"Reliability in gate first and gate last ultra-thin-EOT gate stacks assessed with CV-eMSM BTI characterization","authors":"E. Bury, B. Kaczer, H. Arimura, M. T. Luque, L. Ragnarsson, P. Roussel, A. Veloso, S. Chew, M. Togo, T. Schram, G. Groeseneken","doi":"10.1109/IRPS.2013.6532087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CMOS device improvements have recently been achieved by aggressive scaling of effective oxide thickness (EOT) in Gate First (GF) integration schemes using interfacial layer scavenging. Along with this scaling comes, however, a challenging reliability penalty. Therefore, to decrease the turnaround time of experimental gate stacks, we demonstrate a technique to quantitatively evaluate the long-term bias temperature instability (BTI) behavior of gate stacks on capacitors instead of transistors. We prove that this technique yields comparable results as standard extended measure-stress-measure (eMSM) IV-BTI measurements. Subsequently, we demonstrate in such a short turnaround time experiment that we can achieve scavenging in a Gate Last (GL) processing scheme. Finally, by benefitting from our proposed technique, we conclude that our Gate Last stacks are still more susceptible to BTI than our Gate First stacks with similar EOT.","PeriodicalId":138206,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRPS.2013.6532087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

CMOS device improvements have recently been achieved by aggressive scaling of effective oxide thickness (EOT) in Gate First (GF) integration schemes using interfacial layer scavenging. Along with this scaling comes, however, a challenging reliability penalty. Therefore, to decrease the turnaround time of experimental gate stacks, we demonstrate a technique to quantitatively evaluate the long-term bias temperature instability (BTI) behavior of gate stacks on capacitors instead of transistors. We prove that this technique yields comparable results as standard extended measure-stress-measure (eMSM) IV-BTI measurements. Subsequently, we demonstrate in such a short turnaround time experiment that we can achieve scavenging in a Gate Last (GL) processing scheme. Finally, by benefitting from our proposed technique, we conclude that our Gate Last stacks are still more susceptible to BTI than our Gate First stacks with similar EOT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用CV-eMSM BTI表征方法评估栅极第一和栅极最后超薄eot栅极堆栈的可靠性
近年来,利用界面层清除技术在栅极优先(GF)集成方案中有效氧化层厚度(EOT)的积极缩放已经实现了CMOS器件的改进。然而,伴随这种扩展而来的是具有挑战性的可靠性损失。因此,为了减少实验门堆的循环时间,我们展示了一种定量评估电容而不是晶体管上门堆的长期偏置温度不稳定性(BTI)行为的技术。我们证明该技术与标准扩展测量-应力测量(eMSM) IV-BTI测量结果相当。随后,我们在如此短的周转时间实验中证明,我们可以在Gate Last (GL)处理方案中实现清除。最后,从我们提出的技术中获益,我们得出结论,我们的门最后堆栈仍然比具有类似EOT的门第一堆栈更容易受到BTI的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Resistor-less power-rail ESD clamp circuit with ultra-low leakage current in 65nm CMOS process An age-aware library for reliability simulation of digital ICs Intrinsic study of current crowding and current density gradient effects on electromigration in BEOL copper interconnects Foundations for oxide breakdown compact modeling towards circuit-level simulations Making reliable memories in an unreliable world (invited)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1