Using crowdsourced data for empirical research in information systems: What it is and how to do it safe?

M. Daneva
{"title":"Using crowdsourced data for empirical research in information systems: What it is and how to do it safe?","authors":"M. Daneva","doi":"10.1109/RCIS.2018.8406646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Industry-relevant information systems (IS) and software engineering (SE) research assumes practitioners' involvement, be it in the exploration of the state-of-the-art practice or in the investigation of real-life problems experienced in organizations. Crowdsourcing is an appealing concept for collecting practitioners' perceptions on an industry-relevant phenomenon that is of interest to researchers. As practitioners-generated contents are easily available in social media platforms such as practitioners' blogs or professional discussion groups in LinkedIn, researchers face the opportunity to use this crowdsourced information for the purpose of gaining understanding of a situation from the point of view of the professionals involved therein. While there are many benefits of using crowdsourcing for data collection, there are also challenges, all of which pose validity threats of various degrees to the empirical results obtained. This tutorial will provide a systematic understanding of the use of practitioners' crowdsourced data for empirical research purposes, and of the possible ways to safely apply it in IS and SE research. The tutorial leverages the tutor's experience and lessons learned from using practitioners' blogs articles for qualitative research in business-IT alignment and in large scale online games. At the end of the tutorial, attendees should be able to critically reason about (i) the possible choices in designing a crowdsourcing-based research process, (ii) the quality criteria for judging their research designs, and (iii) the criteria for evaluating their studies.","PeriodicalId":408651,"journal":{"name":"2018 12th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 12th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2018.8406646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Industry-relevant information systems (IS) and software engineering (SE) research assumes practitioners' involvement, be it in the exploration of the state-of-the-art practice or in the investigation of real-life problems experienced in organizations. Crowdsourcing is an appealing concept for collecting practitioners' perceptions on an industry-relevant phenomenon that is of interest to researchers. As practitioners-generated contents are easily available in social media platforms such as practitioners' blogs or professional discussion groups in LinkedIn, researchers face the opportunity to use this crowdsourced information for the purpose of gaining understanding of a situation from the point of view of the professionals involved therein. While there are many benefits of using crowdsourcing for data collection, there are also challenges, all of which pose validity threats of various degrees to the empirical results obtained. This tutorial will provide a systematic understanding of the use of practitioners' crowdsourced data for empirical research purposes, and of the possible ways to safely apply it in IS and SE research. The tutorial leverages the tutor's experience and lessons learned from using practitioners' blogs articles for qualitative research in business-IT alignment and in large scale online games. At the end of the tutorial, attendees should be able to critically reason about (i) the possible choices in designing a crowdsourcing-based research process, (ii) the quality criteria for judging their research designs, and (iii) the criteria for evaluating their studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在信息系统的实证研究中使用众包数据:它是什么以及如何做到安全?
行业相关的信息系统(IS)和软件工程(SE)研究假设从业者的参与,无论是在最先进的实践的探索或在组织中经历的现实问题的调查。众包是一个吸引人的概念,可以收集从业者对研究人员感兴趣的行业相关现象的看法。由于从业者生成的内容很容易在社交媒体平台上获得,例如从业者的博客或LinkedIn的专业讨论组,因此研究人员有机会使用这些众包信息,以便从相关专业人员的角度了解情况。虽然使用众包进行数据收集有很多好处,但也存在挑战,所有这些都对所获得的实证结果构成了不同程度的有效性威胁。本教程将系统地了解从业者的众包数据用于实证研究的目的,以及将其安全地应用于IS和SE研究的可能方法。本教程利用导师的经验和教训,使用实践者的博客文章进行业务- it一致性和大型在线游戏的定性研究。在教程结束时,与会者应该能够批判性地推理(i)设计基于众包的研究过程的可能选择,(ii)判断其研究设计的质量标准,以及(iii)评估其研究的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ProDiGy : Human-in-the-loop process discovery Using Probabilistic Relational Models to generate synthetic spatial or non-spatial databases Fast SPARQL join processing between distributed streams and stored RDF graphs using bloom filters Machine learning with Internet of Things data for risk prediction: Application in ESRD Lip movements recognition towards an automatic lip reading system for Myanmar consonants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1