Digital Resellers: The Case for Secondary Ticket Markets

S. Davies
{"title":"Digital Resellers: The Case for Secondary Ticket Markets","authors":"S. Davies","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3853709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reselling of tickets for events has a long history, dating back at least to Roman times. Such secondary markets in tickets are no different from other kinds of secondary market, and serve the same purpose: to correct flaws in the initial primary market. In recent years, new technology has led to the appearance of many new players in this market. Most of these are facilitating platforms rather than being directly involved as buyers or sellers of tickets. This market is fragmented with no firm having more than a very small part of the total secondary ticket market. That market itself is still small compared to the general market for tickets but is growing rapidly. This has led to many calls for limitations on ticket resale and, in particular, for what are effectively price caps. These arguments are wrongheaded and would disrupt an effective market. The more fundamental or underlying objections to secondary ticket markets are simply rejections of the principles of trade and a refusal to accept the reality of scarcity. It is the primary market for tickets that is dysfunctional. The secondary market is correcting its defects, so that tickets get into the hands of those who value them most. We are probably moving towards a new kind of market in tickets.","PeriodicalId":174628,"journal":{"name":"English Law: Business (Topic)","volume":"41 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Law: Business (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3853709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reselling of tickets for events has a long history, dating back at least to Roman times. Such secondary markets in tickets are no different from other kinds of secondary market, and serve the same purpose: to correct flaws in the initial primary market. In recent years, new technology has led to the appearance of many new players in this market. Most of these are facilitating platforms rather than being directly involved as buyers or sellers of tickets. This market is fragmented with no firm having more than a very small part of the total secondary ticket market. That market itself is still small compared to the general market for tickets but is growing rapidly. This has led to many calls for limitations on ticket resale and, in particular, for what are effectively price caps. These arguments are wrongheaded and would disrupt an effective market. The more fundamental or underlying objections to secondary ticket markets are simply rejections of the principles of trade and a refusal to accept the reality of scarcity. It is the primary market for tickets that is dysfunctional. The secondary market is correcting its defects, so that tickets get into the hands of those who value them most. We are probably moving towards a new kind of market in tickets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字经销商:二级票务市场的案例
转卖赛事门票有着悠久的历史,至少可以追溯到罗马时代。这种票务二级市场与其他类型的二级市场没有什么不同,它们的目的都是一样的:纠正最初一级市场的缺陷。近年来,新技术导致这个市场出现了许多新的参与者。他们中的大多数都是为平台提供便利,而不是直接作为门票的买家或卖家参与其中。这个市场是分散的,没有一家公司只占整个二级票务市场的很小一部分。与一般的门票市场相比,这个市场本身仍然很小,但正在迅速增长。这导致许多人呼吁限制门票转售,特别是实行有效的价格上限。这些观点是错误的,会扰乱一个有效的市场。对二级票务市场更根本或潜在的反对,仅仅是对交易原则的拒绝和对稀缺现实的拒绝。这是一个功能失调的主要票务市场。二级市场正在纠正它的缺陷,这样门票就会落到那些最看重它们的人手中。我们可能正在走向一种新的票务市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19: Assessing Some Potential Global Economic, Business and Legal Impacts The Pursuit to Defeat Underwriter Opportunism: A Comparative Analysis of Combating Misconduct in the Claims Process The Impact of Case Law on the Duty of Trust and Confidence in the English Legal System Parent Company Direct Liability for Overseas Human Rights Violations: Lessons from the UK Supreme Court Applying Economics to the Internet: Can Regulators and Competition Authorities Keep Pace?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1