Fluid Circulation Effects on Torque and Drag Results, a New Take on an Old Subject

M. Mahjoub, N. Dao, M. Summersgill, S. Menand
{"title":"Fluid Circulation Effects on Torque and Drag Results, a New Take on an Old Subject","authors":"M. Mahjoub, N. Dao, M. Summersgill, S. Menand","doi":"10.2118/212558-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The hydraulic effects on torque and drag modelling have been thoroughly studied in the past, yet their interpretation still causes a lot of misunderstandings and confusions. Historical models disregard the circulation effects and focus on the fluid mass by employing buoyancy forces based on Archimedes principle. On the other hand, the reference model including the fluid circulation effects, introduced by R. F. Mitchell in the 1990s, consists in computing the forces due to internal and external fluids along the drill-string. The first type of models called Archimedes method directly produces an effective tension, while the second one generally called pressure area method produces a true tension that must be further transformed to get the effective tension. These different forms of tensions add even more confusion.\n By returning to the basic equations of the fluid effects on the drill string, an equivalency between Archimedes and pressure area models has been found for the case with no circulation. Furthermore, with the same principle, an Archimedes-like model is deduced for the case of fluid circulation, where the effects of fluid pressures, frictions, and flows could be more easily interpreted. These two hydraulic models, after implementation in a true stiff-string 3D model enable then to fairly compare the two approaches in terms of forces applied on the structure.\n The comparison of this Archimedes formulation with pressure area model gave sensibly the same results for various scenarios, proving the equivalency of the two approaches even with the case of circulating fluid. In addition to the model-to-model comparisons, torque and drag results are compared to field experiments at different depths. Flow rate was varied while reciprocating the drill string up and down, and the hook load was recorded for each flow rate and each tripping direction. The model-to-data comparisons showed a good agreement between the theoretical results and experimental data.\n An advanced Archimedes method with all fluid circulation effect has been developed. By tackling the problem of circulating fluid in the drill string using two different approaches and proving their equivalency, a better understanding of the hydraulic effects can be achieved, which in terms can help settle the possible debates and confusions that might arise by drilling engineers.","PeriodicalId":103776,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 08, 2023","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 08, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212558-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The hydraulic effects on torque and drag modelling have been thoroughly studied in the past, yet their interpretation still causes a lot of misunderstandings and confusions. Historical models disregard the circulation effects and focus on the fluid mass by employing buoyancy forces based on Archimedes principle. On the other hand, the reference model including the fluid circulation effects, introduced by R. F. Mitchell in the 1990s, consists in computing the forces due to internal and external fluids along the drill-string. The first type of models called Archimedes method directly produces an effective tension, while the second one generally called pressure area method produces a true tension that must be further transformed to get the effective tension. These different forms of tensions add even more confusion. By returning to the basic equations of the fluid effects on the drill string, an equivalency between Archimedes and pressure area models has been found for the case with no circulation. Furthermore, with the same principle, an Archimedes-like model is deduced for the case of fluid circulation, where the effects of fluid pressures, frictions, and flows could be more easily interpreted. These two hydraulic models, after implementation in a true stiff-string 3D model enable then to fairly compare the two approaches in terms of forces applied on the structure. The comparison of this Archimedes formulation with pressure area model gave sensibly the same results for various scenarios, proving the equivalency of the two approaches even with the case of circulating fluid. In addition to the model-to-model comparisons, torque and drag results are compared to field experiments at different depths. Flow rate was varied while reciprocating the drill string up and down, and the hook load was recorded for each flow rate and each tripping direction. The model-to-data comparisons showed a good agreement between the theoretical results and experimental data. An advanced Archimedes method with all fluid circulation effect has been developed. By tackling the problem of circulating fluid in the drill string using two different approaches and proving their equivalency, a better understanding of the hydraulic effects can be achieved, which in terms can help settle the possible debates and confusions that might arise by drilling engineers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流体循环对扭矩和阻力结果的影响,一个老问题的新解决
水力对扭矩和阻力建模的影响已经得到了深入的研究,但其解释仍然存在许多误解和混乱。历史模型忽略了循环效应,根据阿基米德原理利用浮力来关注流体质量。另一方面,R. F. Mitchell在20世纪90年代引入的包含流体循环效应的参考模型是计算沿钻柱的内外流体所产生的力。第一类模型称为阿基米德法,直接产生有效张力,而第二类模型通常称为压力区法,产生真张力,必须进一步转化才能得到有效张力。这些不同形式的紧张关系增加了更多的混乱。通过回归流体对钻柱影响的基本方程,在没有循环的情况下,阿基米德模型和压力面积模型之间存在等效性。此外,根据同样的原理,我们还推导出了流体循环的类似阿基米德的模型,在这种情况下,流体压力、摩擦和流动的影响可以更容易地解释。这两种水力模型在真正的硬管柱3D模型中实现后,可以比较两种方法在结构上施加的力。将阿基米德公式与压力面积模型进行比较,在各种情况下得出了大致相同的结果,证明了这两种方法即使在循环流体的情况下也是等效的。除了模型与模型之间的比较外,还将扭矩和阻力结果与不同深度的现场实验结果进行了比较。在上下往复钻柱时,改变流量,并记录每个流量和每个起下钻方向下的钩载荷。模型与数据的比较表明,理论结果与实验数据吻合较好。开发了一种先进的阿基米德方法,具有全流体循环效应。通过使用两种不同的方法来解决钻柱中循环流体的问题,并证明它们的等效性,可以更好地了解水力效应,从而有助于解决钻井工程师可能出现的争论和困惑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From preventive to predictive maintenance of ship hulls: The role of SHM Deployment of a Hybrid Machine Learning and Physics Based Drilling Advisory System at the Rig Site for ROP Optimization Gas Migration in PMCD Operations: Instrumented Well Study Provides Fundamental Insights Improved Drilling Line Fatigue Model Reveals a Need for Revising Slip and Cut Procedures Improving the Accuracy of a Kick-detection System by Reducing Effects of Rig Operational Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1