Clinical presentations and practitioner levels appropriate for the introduction of ‘Treat and Referral’ into the Irish Emergency Medical Service: A survey of Consultants in emergency medicine.

B. Power, J. Ryan, G. Bury
{"title":"Clinical presentations and practitioner levels appropriate for the introduction of ‘Treat and Referral’ into the Irish Emergency Medical Service: A survey of Consultants in emergency medicine.","authors":"B. Power, J. Ryan, G. Bury","doi":"10.32378/ijp.v5i1.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) is an international issue and ambulance bypass is seen as one element of the solution to a complex problem. Irish EDs are not immune to this healthcare crisis, which, together with increased off-load delays for ambulances, is one catalyst for the introduction of Treat and Referral (paramedic non-ED disposition decision).  The confidence of consultants in emergency medicine in paramedics and advanced paramedics offering Treat and Referral to patients presenting with hypoglycaemia or seizure was explored.  Other specific clinical presentations were also investigated for suitability for Treat and Referral and a consensus was sought on an upper age limit for such patients.    Methods: Public-sector consultants in emergency medicine in Ireland at the time of the study, were invited to complete an online survey.  A 62% response was received from the targeted population. Results: Confidence was expressed in advanced paramedics offering Treat and Referral to patients with hypoglycaemia or seizure by the majority (78%) of respondents. However, confidence was reduced for paramedics (53%). Six of the twelve specific clinical presentations received clear support as suitable for Treat and Referral, with the remaining receiving reducing support and ‘falls in the elderly (without injury)’ was opposed.  There was no consensus on an upper age limit for patients being offered Treat and Referral. Conclusions: Support for the highest level of EMS practitioner in Ireland, advanced paramedic, to expand their scope of practice to include Treat and Referral was identified.  Clinical presentations have been identified that would be conducive to a Treat and Referral clinical care pathway.  A trial implementation period may be essential to build confidence in the programme before a universal roll out.","PeriodicalId":367364,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32378/ijp.v5i1.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) is an international issue and ambulance bypass is seen as one element of the solution to a complex problem. Irish EDs are not immune to this healthcare crisis, which, together with increased off-load delays for ambulances, is one catalyst for the introduction of Treat and Referral (paramedic non-ED disposition decision).  The confidence of consultants in emergency medicine in paramedics and advanced paramedics offering Treat and Referral to patients presenting with hypoglycaemia or seizure was explored.  Other specific clinical presentations were also investigated for suitability for Treat and Referral and a consensus was sought on an upper age limit for such patients.    Methods: Public-sector consultants in emergency medicine in Ireland at the time of the study, were invited to complete an online survey.  A 62% response was received from the targeted population. Results: Confidence was expressed in advanced paramedics offering Treat and Referral to patients with hypoglycaemia or seizure by the majority (78%) of respondents. However, confidence was reduced for paramedics (53%). Six of the twelve specific clinical presentations received clear support as suitable for Treat and Referral, with the remaining receiving reducing support and ‘falls in the elderly (without injury)’ was opposed.  There was no consensus on an upper age limit for patients being offered Treat and Referral. Conclusions: Support for the highest level of EMS practitioner in Ireland, advanced paramedic, to expand their scope of practice to include Treat and Referral was identified.  Clinical presentations have been identified that would be conducive to a Treat and Referral clinical care pathway.  A trial implementation period may be essential to build confidence in the programme before a universal roll out.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适合在爱尔兰紧急医疗服务中引入"治疗和转诊"的临床表现和从业人员水平:对急诊医学顾问的调查。
目标:急诊科过度拥挤是一个国际问题,救护车分流被视为解决这一复杂问题的一个要素。爱尔兰急诊科也不能避免这种医疗危机,这与救护车卸载延误的增加一起,是引入治疗和转诊(护理人员非急诊科处置决定)的催化剂之一。探讨了急诊医学顾问对低血糖或癫痫患者提供治疗和转诊的护理人员和高级护理人员的信心。其他特殊的临床表现也被调查是否适合治疗和转诊,并就此类患者的年龄上限达成共识。方法:在研究期间,爱尔兰急诊医学的公共部门顾问被邀请完成一项在线调查。目标人群的回复率为62%。结果:大多数(78%)的受访者表示,对低血糖或癫痫患者提供治疗和转诊的高级护理人员有信心。然而,护理人员的信心降低了(53%)。在12个具体的临床表现中,有6个得到了明确的支持,适合治疗和转诊,其余的得到了减少支持,“老年人跌倒(无损伤)”被反对。对于接受治疗和转诊的患者的年龄上限没有达成共识。结论:支持最高水平的EMS从业者在爱尔兰,先进的护理人员,扩大他们的实践范围,包括治疗和转诊被确定。临床表现已确定,这将有利于治疗和转诊临床护理途径。在普遍推广之前,可能需要一段试验期来建立对该方案的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical presentations and practitioner levels appropriate for the introduction of ‘Treat and Referral’ into the Irish Emergency Medical Service: A survey of Consultants in emergency medicine. Wellbeing series: Meditation for paramedics Wellbeing series: Empathy and paramedic wellbeing Wellbeing Series: Shifting the Focus to Nutrition Wellbeing Series: Building Mental Health Resilience for Emergency Personnel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1