Groups and Social Boundaries

J. Fuhse
{"title":"Groups and Social Boundaries","authors":"J. Fuhse","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190275433.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social groups were a key concept in early sociology (German formal sociology, symbolic interactionism). Since the 1960s, they have been replaced by “social network” as the prime concept for informal social structures. We rarely find the bounded and internally homogeneous social units suggested by the group concept in the real world. Instead, individuals are embedded in a complex mesh of social relationships. Building on relational sociology, we can reconceptualize groups as a particular case of densely connected network patterns of social relationships. These exist only by degree, to the extent that they are reinforced by a social boundary separating the group members symbolically from the outside world and by foci of activity for the group to meet. Densely connected groups develop a particular group culture, and they frequently use symbols to signal group membership and the cultural difference to other groups and to the wider cultural context (group style).","PeriodicalId":103982,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks of Meaning and Communication","volume":"212 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks of Meaning and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190275433.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social groups were a key concept in early sociology (German formal sociology, symbolic interactionism). Since the 1960s, they have been replaced by “social network” as the prime concept for informal social structures. We rarely find the bounded and internally homogeneous social units suggested by the group concept in the real world. Instead, individuals are embedded in a complex mesh of social relationships. Building on relational sociology, we can reconceptualize groups as a particular case of densely connected network patterns of social relationships. These exist only by degree, to the extent that they are reinforced by a social boundary separating the group members symbolically from the outside world and by foci of activity for the group to meet. Densely connected groups develop a particular group culture, and they frequently use symbols to signal group membership and the cultural difference to other groups and to the wider cultural context (group style).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
群体和社会界限
社会群体是早期社会学(德国形式社会学、象征互动主义)的一个重要概念。自20世纪60年代以来,它们已被“社会网络”取代,成为非正式社会结构的主要概念。在现实世界中,我们很少发现群体概念所暗示的有界的、内部同质的社会单位。相反,个人被嵌入到一个复杂的社会关系网络中。在关系社会学的基础上,我们可以将群体重新定义为社会关系紧密连接的网络模式的一个特殊案例。这些只是在程度上存在,在某种程度上,它们被社会边界所加强,社会边界象征性地将群体成员与外部世界分开,并通过群体活动的焦点来满足。紧密联系的群体形成了一种特定的群体文化,他们经常使用符号来表明群体成员身份以及与其他群体和更广泛的文化背景(群体风格)的文化差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethnic Categories and Cultural Differences Love and Gender Groups and Social Boundaries Roles and Institutions Events in Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1