Evaluation and accreditation from the perspective of university students: An educational experience at the Universidad Autónoma De Chiapas

Marco Ovando, Maria Elizondo, Octavio Grajales
{"title":"Evaluation and accreditation from the perspective of university students: An educational experience at the Universidad Autónoma De Chiapas","authors":"Marco Ovando, Maria Elizondo, Octavio Grajales","doi":"10.35429/ejrc.2021.13.7.33.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work is the result of an investigation developed in the Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas, which is born of the interest that exists on the part of members of the Academic Board for Policy, Management, Education and Diversity (CA) to the need to know the impact they have had evaluation processes and accreditation level in schools and in the University. In this context, it is essential to know the opinion of the writers who are directly involved with the results obtained in each of the educational programs that have been subjected to these processes and have achieved their accreditation. Methodologically, the study has a tendency towards critical social paradigm, with a mixed approach (qualitative and quantitative) where the opinion of the university through interviews, in other case, is recovered through analysis of surveys of the university community, Given the specific weight that each of the actors in the process of evaluation and accreditation of each of the educational programs was essential to know the view of the university authorities responsible for the management of faculties and the heads of the coordination of evaluation and accreditation; For this, a series of interviews with those who occupied strategic positions in the administration were made; that is, those who have access to information regarding such processes. This work is approached from four categories: 1) Public Policy, 2) Management, 3) organization and 4) Results and Impact. In the specific case of this paper, it only discloses the results in the category of public policy and its indicators: assessment, accreditation and Norming.","PeriodicalId":325758,"journal":{"name":"ECORFAN Journal Republic of Cameroon","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECORFAN Journal Republic of Cameroon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35429/ejrc.2021.13.7.33.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work is the result of an investigation developed in the Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas, which is born of the interest that exists on the part of members of the Academic Board for Policy, Management, Education and Diversity (CA) to the need to know the impact they have had evaluation processes and accreditation level in schools and in the University. In this context, it is essential to know the opinion of the writers who are directly involved with the results obtained in each of the educational programs that have been subjected to these processes and have achieved their accreditation. Methodologically, the study has a tendency towards critical social paradigm, with a mixed approach (qualitative and quantitative) where the opinion of the university through interviews, in other case, is recovered through analysis of surveys of the university community, Given the specific weight that each of the actors in the process of evaluation and accreditation of each of the educational programs was essential to know the view of the university authorities responsible for the management of faculties and the heads of the coordination of evaluation and accreditation; For this, a series of interviews with those who occupied strategic positions in the administration were made; that is, those who have access to information regarding such processes. This work is approached from four categories: 1) Public Policy, 2) Management, 3) organization and 4) Results and Impact. In the specific case of this paper, it only discloses the results in the category of public policy and its indicators: assessment, accreditation and Norming.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从大学生的角度评估和认证:在universsidad Autónoma De Chiapas的教育经历
这项工作是在universsidad Autónoma de Chiapas开展的一项调查的结果,该调查源于政策、管理、教育和多样性学术委员会(CA)成员的兴趣,他们需要了解他们对学校和大学的评估过程和认证水平的影响。在这种情况下,了解直接参与每个教育项目所获得的结果的作者的意见是至关重要的,这些项目已经经过了这些过程并获得了认证。在方法上,该研究倾向于批判社会范式,采用混合方法(定性和定量),其中通过访谈获得大学的意见,在其他情况下,通过分析大学社区的调查来恢复。考虑到每个教育项目的评估和认证过程中的每个参与者都必须了解负责院系管理的大学当局和协调评估和认证的负责人的观点;为此,对在政府中担任战略要职的人进行了一系列采访;也就是说,那些能够获得有关这些过程的信息的人。这项工作从四个方面进行:1)公共政策,2)管理,3)组织和4)结果和影响。在本文的具体案例中,仅披露了公共政策类别及其指标:评估、认可和规范的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial Sustainability in MSMEs of civil and electrical engineering in Coatzacoalcos Growth and development of Greek basil variety Medinette in greenhouses and shade netting Application of Big Data tools in the analysis of visitors to museums and archaeological sites in the State of Oaxaca Identification of market needs for the implementation of a psychological care center Degree of relationship between performance and labor productivity in the performance indicators of a service area of a Higher Education Institution in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1