Exit From Contract

O. Bar‐Gill, O. Ben‐Shahar
{"title":"Exit From Contract","authors":"O. Bar‐Gill, O. Ben‐Shahar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2220271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exit from contract is one of the most powerful consumer protection devices, freeing consumers from bad deals and keeping businesses honest. Yet consumers often choose transactions with lock-in provisions, trading off exit rights for other perks. This article examines the costs and benefits of free exit, as compared to the lock-in alternative. It argues that present regulation of exit penalties is poorly tailored to address concerns about lock-in, particularly in light of increasingly ubiquitous market-based solutions. The article also calls (regulatory) attention to loyalty rewards, which are shown to be as powerful as exit penalties, and equally detrimental.","PeriodicalId":333064,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Issues Involving the Sale of Goods or Services to Consumers (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Issues Involving the Sale of Goods or Services to Consumers (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2220271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

Exit from contract is one of the most powerful consumer protection devices, freeing consumers from bad deals and keeping businesses honest. Yet consumers often choose transactions with lock-in provisions, trading off exit rights for other perks. This article examines the costs and benefits of free exit, as compared to the lock-in alternative. It argues that present regulation of exit penalties is poorly tailored to address concerns about lock-in, particularly in light of increasingly ubiquitous market-based solutions. The article also calls (regulatory) attention to loyalty rewards, which are shown to be as powerful as exit penalties, and equally detrimental.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解除合同
合同退出是最有力的消费者保护手段之一,它使消费者免受不良交易的影响,并使企业保持诚信。然而,消费者通常会选择带有锁定条款的交易,用退出权换取其他好处。本文研究了自由退出的成本和收益,并与锁定选项进行了比较。该报告认为,目前对退出处罚的监管在解决对锁定的担忧方面做得很差,尤其是在市场解决方案日益普遍的情况下。这篇文章还呼吁(监管部门)关注忠诚奖励,这种奖励被证明与退出惩罚一样强大,而且同样有害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Basis of Consumer Protection Against Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract in Cameroon Signs Eligible for Trademark Protection in the European Union – Dysfunctional Incentives and a Functionality Dilemma Once Vehicle Is Sold During Pendency of the Complaint, Complainant Ceases to Be ‘Consumer’: The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Online Terms as In Terrorem Devices Fine is Only One Click Away
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1