The Human Mind: Animal Heritage and Cultural Vectors

J. Colombo
{"title":"The Human Mind: Animal Heritage and Cultural Vectors","authors":"J. Colombo","doi":"10.33422/10TH.HPS.2020.03.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Humans are biological entities with social and cultural history; both dimensions metaphorically expressed as the “Biological-” and “Cultural-tectonic plates”. In an evolutive context, the concept of predation applied to the Natural Kingdom appears as an anticipation to our species’ cultural predatory behaviors. They include dynamic components associated with violence linked to social prevalence, reproductive behavior, territoriality, and access to food resources, and, in general, to aggressive or maladaptive behaviors. Another view of our “Cultural tectonic plate” has been lucidly expressed by Eduardo Colombo (2012): “the structure of our basic knowledge represents an epistemological field built on the old archetype of submission, where the subject is subdued by the networks that weave the practices and discourses that condition it; let's say to be brief, a subject determined by the structure of the system.\" Based on the behaviors of the chimpanzee and the bonobo, who share a common ancestor to Homo, Boehm (2012) poses that humans would keep behavioral styles from chimpanzees (tendency to conflict, male predominance), and bonobos (preventive behavior, female predominance). This anticipates a potential behavioral bipolarity with uneven prevalence distribution among individuals and social organizations. Based on social repression or “socialization”, cultural strata of variable “thickness” have been constructed on top of drives implicit to our animal condition. Nevertheless, it failed in their deactivation, only in reformulating or repressing them.","PeriodicalId":445885,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ‏The 10th International Conference on Humanities, Psychology and Social Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ‏The 10th International Conference on Humanities, Psychology and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/10TH.HPS.2020.03.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans are biological entities with social and cultural history; both dimensions metaphorically expressed as the “Biological-” and “Cultural-tectonic plates”. In an evolutive context, the concept of predation applied to the Natural Kingdom appears as an anticipation to our species’ cultural predatory behaviors. They include dynamic components associated with violence linked to social prevalence, reproductive behavior, territoriality, and access to food resources, and, in general, to aggressive or maladaptive behaviors. Another view of our “Cultural tectonic plate” has been lucidly expressed by Eduardo Colombo (2012): “the structure of our basic knowledge represents an epistemological field built on the old archetype of submission, where the subject is subdued by the networks that weave the practices and discourses that condition it; let's say to be brief, a subject determined by the structure of the system." Based on the behaviors of the chimpanzee and the bonobo, who share a common ancestor to Homo, Boehm (2012) poses that humans would keep behavioral styles from chimpanzees (tendency to conflict, male predominance), and bonobos (preventive behavior, female predominance). This anticipates a potential behavioral bipolarity with uneven prevalence distribution among individuals and social organizations. Based on social repression or “socialization”, cultural strata of variable “thickness” have been constructed on top of drives implicit to our animal condition. Nevertheless, it failed in their deactivation, only in reformulating or repressing them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类心智:动物遗产和文化载体
人类是具有社会和文化历史的生物实体;这两个维度都隐喻地表达为“生物板块”和“文化板块”。在进化的背景下,适用于自然王国的捕食概念似乎是对我们物种文化掠夺行为的一种预期。它们包括与社会流行、生殖行为、领土和获取食物资源有关的暴力相关的动态成分,以及通常与攻击性或适应不良行为有关的动态成分。爱德华多·科伦坡(Eduardo Colombo, 2012)清楚地表达了我们“文化构造板块”的另一种观点:“我们基本知识的结构代表了一个建立在顺从的旧原型上的认识论领域,在这个领域,主体被编织实践和话语的网络所征服;简而言之,一个由系统结构决定的主题。”基于黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩的行为,Boehm(2012)提出,人类将保留黑猩猩(冲突倾向,雄性优势)和倭黑猩猩(预防行为,雌性优势)的行为风格。这预示着一种潜在的行为两极化,在个人和社会组织中患病率分布不均衡。在社会压抑或“社会化”的基础上,可变“厚度”的文化阶层建立在我们动物状态所隐含的驱动力之上。然而,它未能使它们失效,只是重新形成或抑制了它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ehma Ainun Nadjib and a Movement from the Darkness to the Light The Portrayal of Ideal Beauty both in the Media and in the Fashion Industry and How These Together Lead to Harmful Consequences Such as Eating Disorders The Human Mind: Animal Heritage and Cultural Vectors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1