{"title":"\"Urbanistic Architecture\" According to Raul Lino","authors":"P. Pereira","doi":"10.17831/enq:arcc.v17i1.1064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over a period of nearly one hundred years, Raul Lino (1879-1974) experienced the profound political, social and economic changes that marked the twentieth century in Portugal. Having been born during the Constitutional Monarchy (1822-1910), he lived through the First Republic (1910-1926), the Military Dictatorship (1926-1933), the Second Republic, or Estado Novo (New State, 1933-1974), and died shortly after the Carnation Revolution of 25 April 1974, at the dawning of the Third Republic. He was an architect who published prolifically in Portugal, having become known through his advocacy of the Campanha da casa Portuguesa (Portuguese House Campaign), which provoked a great deal of controversy. The debate peaked with the Polémica da casa Portuguesa (Polemic of the Portuguese house) at the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation in 1970, after the inauguration of the retrospective exhibition on Raul Lino. He is less known for the quality of his transversal synthesis conceived between urbanism, architecture, the decorative arts, and its underlying affirmation of an idea of the city, which we conjecture from our analysis of his narrative. This analysis concentrates on eleven case studies that encompasses architectural projects, urbanistic plans and technical advice limited to the first half of the 20th century. The broad, cross-disciplinary position of Lino was defended in the same year as the First National Architecture Congress (1948), whose proposals ratified in Portugal the orthodoxy principles of modern architecture and urban planning for the new universal man-type, established in 1933 by the International Congresses of Modern Architecture (CIAM). Quoting Aristotle, Raul Lino conceived the city as the locus of happiness, shaping forms of consensus between tradition and modernity by means of an architecture at the scale of man and in proportion to his circumstance, consistently outlining a modern possibility of continuity.","PeriodicalId":339072,"journal":{"name":"Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17831/enq:arcc.v17i1.1064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over a period of nearly one hundred years, Raul Lino (1879-1974) experienced the profound political, social and economic changes that marked the twentieth century in Portugal. Having been born during the Constitutional Monarchy (1822-1910), he lived through the First Republic (1910-1926), the Military Dictatorship (1926-1933), the Second Republic, or Estado Novo (New State, 1933-1974), and died shortly after the Carnation Revolution of 25 April 1974, at the dawning of the Third Republic. He was an architect who published prolifically in Portugal, having become known through his advocacy of the Campanha da casa Portuguesa (Portuguese House Campaign), which provoked a great deal of controversy. The debate peaked with the Polémica da casa Portuguesa (Polemic of the Portuguese house) at the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation in 1970, after the inauguration of the retrospective exhibition on Raul Lino. He is less known for the quality of his transversal synthesis conceived between urbanism, architecture, the decorative arts, and its underlying affirmation of an idea of the city, which we conjecture from our analysis of his narrative. This analysis concentrates on eleven case studies that encompasses architectural projects, urbanistic plans and technical advice limited to the first half of the 20th century. The broad, cross-disciplinary position of Lino was defended in the same year as the First National Architecture Congress (1948), whose proposals ratified in Portugal the orthodoxy principles of modern architecture and urban planning for the new universal man-type, established in 1933 by the International Congresses of Modern Architecture (CIAM). Quoting Aristotle, Raul Lino conceived the city as the locus of happiness, shaping forms of consensus between tradition and modernity by means of an architecture at the scale of man and in proportion to his circumstance, consistently outlining a modern possibility of continuity.
在将近100年的时间里,劳尔·利诺(1879-1974)经历了葡萄牙20世纪深刻的政治、社会和经济变革。他出生于君主立宪制时期(1822-1910),经历了第一共和国(1910-1926)、军事独裁(1926-1933)、第二共和国或Estado Novo(新国家,1933-1974),在1974年4月25日康乃馨革命后不久,在第三共和国的曙光中去世。他是一名建筑师,在葡萄牙发表了大量作品,他因倡导葡萄牙房屋运动(Campanha da casa portuesa)而闻名,该运动引发了大量争议。1970年,劳尔•利诺回顾展开幕后,在卡卢斯特•古尔班基安基金会(Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation)举行的“葡萄牙人之争”(pol mica da casa portuesa)上,这场辩论达到了顶峰。他在城市主义、建筑、装饰艺术之间的横向综合构思,以及对城市理念的潜在肯定,这一点我们从对他的叙述的分析中推测出来,他的知名度较低。本分析集中于11个案例研究,涵盖了限于20世纪上半叶的建筑项目、城市规划和技术建议。利诺的广泛、跨学科的立场在同年的第一届国家建筑大会(1948年)上得到了捍卫,该大会的提案批准了1933年由国际现代建筑大会(CIAM)在葡萄牙建立的现代建筑和城市规划的新普遍类型的正统原则。引用亚里士多德的话,Raul Lino认为城市是幸福的所在地,通过建筑在人的尺度和环境的比例上塑造传统与现代之间的共识形式,始终勾勒出现代连续性的可能性。