Evolving Design Pedagogies: Broadening Universal Design for Social Justice

Victoria Lanteigne, T. Rider, P. Stratton
{"title":"Evolving Design Pedagogies: Broadening Universal Design for Social Justice","authors":"Victoria Lanteigne, T. Rider, P. Stratton","doi":"10.17831/enqarcc.v19i1.1135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Universal Design came into prominence as a successor to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), contributing to broader notions of accessibility beyond baseline codes and standards. Rooted in human factors research, Universal Design primarily centers on supporting human performance through the development of accessible and usable environments (Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 95-96). As such, Universal Design pedagogies predominantly focus on enhancing environments for people with disabilities and aging populations (O Shea 2018, 721; Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 49). However, some believe Universal Design is on the cusp of a paradigm shift to address broader aspects of social justice (Salmen 2012; Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 159-160). This paper synthesizes existing literature to explore how current academic and practice-facing Universal Design pedagogies support the movement’s expansion to address social justice across demographic groups. Critical audiences for this work include architectural educators, students, researchers, policymakers, and building professionals interested in advancing the theory and practice of Universal Design. Recommendations from this work reposition Universal Design pedagogies as a pathway for creating more equitable and inclusive buildings, spaces, and communities that are truly designed for all. ","PeriodicalId":339072,"journal":{"name":"Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17831/enqarcc.v19i1.1135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Universal Design came into prominence as a successor to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), contributing to broader notions of accessibility beyond baseline codes and standards. Rooted in human factors research, Universal Design primarily centers on supporting human performance through the development of accessible and usable environments (Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 95-96). As such, Universal Design pedagogies predominantly focus on enhancing environments for people with disabilities and aging populations (O Shea 2018, 721; Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 49). However, some believe Universal Design is on the cusp of a paradigm shift to address broader aspects of social justice (Salmen 2012; Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 159-160). This paper synthesizes existing literature to explore how current academic and practice-facing Universal Design pedagogies support the movement’s expansion to address social justice across demographic groups. Critical audiences for this work include architectural educators, students, researchers, policymakers, and building professionals interested in advancing the theory and practice of Universal Design. Recommendations from this work reposition Universal Design pedagogies as a pathway for creating more equitable and inclusive buildings, spaces, and communities that are truly designed for all. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不断发展的设计教学法:为社会正义拓宽通用设计
通用设计作为《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)的继承者而变得突出,为超越基准代码和标准的更广泛的可访问性概念做出了贡献。通用设计植根于人的因素研究,主要侧重于通过开发可访问和可用的环境来支持人的绩效(Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 95-96)。因此,通用设计教学法主要侧重于改善残疾人和老年人的环境(O Shea 2018, 721;Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 49)。然而,一些人认为通用设计正处于解决社会正义更广泛方面的范式转变的风口浪尖(Salmen 2012;Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 159-160)。本文综合现有文献,探讨当前面向学术和实践的通用设计教学法如何支持该运动的扩展,以解决跨人口群体的社会正义问题。这本书的主要读者包括建筑教育工作者、学生、研究人员、政策制定者和对推进通用设计理论和实践感兴趣的建筑专业人士。这项工作的建议将通用设计教学法重新定位为创造更加公平和包容的建筑、空间和社区的途径,这些建筑、空间和社区真正为所有人设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Embodied Contradictions and Post-Industrial Built Environments Designing Post-Digital Hybrid Workplaces The Design Lodge Evolving Design Pedagogies: Broadening Universal Design for Social Justice Inclusive Design Studios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1