The true and fair view concept: the palette of controversial points (of “worth banning” to “worth keeping”)

Y. Ustinova
{"title":"The true and fair view concept: the palette of controversial points (of “worth banning” to “worth keeping”)","authors":"Y. Ustinova","doi":"10.33847/2712-8148.2.1_4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dynamic changes and observed crisis phenomena in the economy, as well as high-profile accounting scandals of recent decades and subsequent revisions of accounting standards, necessitate a critical assessment of the conceptual framework for preparing financial statements that are adequate to the real state of affairs. At the same time, the accumulated practice of applying the true and fair view concept revealed some shortcomings. In this situation, the center of attraction of researchers' interest is the question of whether this concept meets the modern challenges of accounting, whether it is advisable to preserve and develop it. The aim of the article: an overview of the main research trends describing the significance of this concept for the current state of accounting, an assessment of the stages of their development. The analysis was carried out through research of scientific publications. The result was the identification of the main researching areas of the true and fair view concept, an analysis of their changes over time, an overview of the current increment of scientific knowledge, and the factors that led to such an increment for the last few years. In the course of the work, the areas of emerging scientific interest, as well as areas of maintaining scientific interest, were noted from the position of enriching theoretical and practical knowledge about the applicability of the concept. Special attention was drawn to the following issues: the relationship between overrides from accounting standards and the quality of financial statements, options for interpreting the concept by various groups of users of financial statements in settings of the legal and socio-cultural context differences, the role of auditors in assessing of the compliance with this concept. In conclusion were called the arguments of supporters to recognize this concept as worthy of banning, as well as the arguments of supporters to recognize this concept as worthy of keeping. Prospective directions of future scientific research in this direction were proposed.","PeriodicalId":219098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Art & Humanities","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Art & Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33847/2712-8148.2.1_4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Dynamic changes and observed crisis phenomena in the economy, as well as high-profile accounting scandals of recent decades and subsequent revisions of accounting standards, necessitate a critical assessment of the conceptual framework for preparing financial statements that are adequate to the real state of affairs. At the same time, the accumulated practice of applying the true and fair view concept revealed some shortcomings. In this situation, the center of attraction of researchers' interest is the question of whether this concept meets the modern challenges of accounting, whether it is advisable to preserve and develop it. The aim of the article: an overview of the main research trends describing the significance of this concept for the current state of accounting, an assessment of the stages of their development. The analysis was carried out through research of scientific publications. The result was the identification of the main researching areas of the true and fair view concept, an analysis of their changes over time, an overview of the current increment of scientific knowledge, and the factors that led to such an increment for the last few years. In the course of the work, the areas of emerging scientific interest, as well as areas of maintaining scientific interest, were noted from the position of enriching theoretical and practical knowledge about the applicability of the concept. Special attention was drawn to the following issues: the relationship between overrides from accounting standards and the quality of financial statements, options for interpreting the concept by various groups of users of financial statements in settings of the legal and socio-cultural context differences, the role of auditors in assessing of the compliance with this concept. In conclusion were called the arguments of supporters to recognize this concept as worthy of banning, as well as the arguments of supporters to recognize this concept as worthy of keeping. Prospective directions of future scientific research in this direction were proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正义观:争议点的调色板(从“值得禁止”到“值得保留”)
经济中的动态变化和观察到的危机现象,以及近几十年来引人注目的会计丑闻和随后的会计标准修订,都需要对编制符合实际情况的财务报表的概念框架进行批判性评估。与此同时,在实践中积累的真实公正观点的运用也暴露出一些不足。在这种情况下,吸引研究者兴趣的中心问题是,这一概念是否符合现代会计的挑战,是否值得保留和发展。本文的目的:概述了主要的研究趋势,描述了这一概念对会计现状的意义,对其发展阶段进行了评估。分析是通过对科学出版物的研究进行的。结果是确定了真实和公平观点概念的主要研究领域,分析了它们随时间的变化,概述了当前科学知识的增长,以及导致过去几年这种增长的因素。在工作过程中,从丰富关于这一概念适用性的理论和实践知识的角度,注意到新兴的科学兴趣领域以及保持科学兴趣的领域。特别提请注意下列问题:会计准则的撤销与财务报表的质量之间的关系;在法律和社会文化背景不同的情况下,财务报表的不同使用者群体解释这一概念的各种选择;审计员在评估遵守这一概念方面的作用。综上所述,有两种观点认为这一概念值得禁止,也有两种观点认为这一概念值得保留。提出了该方向未来科学研究的展望方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sentiment Evolution Analysis and Association Rule Mining for COVID-19 Tweets Existing in Etherium: The autographic ontology of the non-fungible token artwork Teaching techniques adapted for online delivery to achieve course learning outcomes in a virtual environment The effects of different genres of music on passersby Digitalization and Backward Design take the finance teaching techniques and study plan strategy one step further
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1