Evaluating the energy demand for municipal solid wastes treatment facilities: A critical approach toward sustainable development

C. Psomopoulos, I. Limperis, K. Kalkanis
{"title":"Evaluating the energy demand for municipal solid wastes treatment facilities: A critical approach toward sustainable development","authors":"C. Psomopoulos, I. Limperis, K. Kalkanis","doi":"10.1063/1.5138532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Directives, along with the general notion that wastes are resources, and the effort to reduce the environmental impact in urban environment from waste management, are the driving forces behind waste to energy philosophy. The most sustainable cities in the EU consider that their sustainability is also based on energy recovery from wastes. They all use Waste-to-Energy facilities to treat a significant segment of their waste in order to produce energy in the form of heat and electricity. They do so in a very successful and environmentally friendly way, as they mainly utilise waste fractions that cannot be recycled or reused, and they do not dispose of these resources in landfills. This approach proves that sustainable waste management cannot be achieved without Waste-to-Energy facilities, since a fraction of wastes consists of non-recyclable and non- reusable materials, which provide a significant heating value that cannot be neglected as an energy source. Apart from recycling, Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) treatment is achieved through various processes that aim towards the conversion of waste into useful forms of energy or easily biodegradable, stabilized products. Dedicated treatment methods for getting different refuse derived products that can be used as fuel for producing energy are available. The aim of this paper is to briefly present these methods, review their processes and reveal where their individual energy costs/losses are derived from. A review and a calculation example for the methods of Recycling, Anaerobic Digestion, Composting, Biodrying and combustion are presented concisely. Finally, these methods are compared in terms of energy costs and recovery. Moreover, the calculation methodology of the energy costs of MSW treatment facility is presented. Energy costs/losses are not a synonym for the efficiency of a MSW treatment method, but are an important factor that must be taken into consideration when designing a MSW treatment facility. Furthermore, different waste mixtures will provide different results for this study but the main conclusion remains unaltered: In terms of energy demand for waste management a percentage of methods are energy consuming and others are energy producing, or lead to significant energy savings, which is key action for a sustainable future. Municipal wastes is one of the greatest problems that the modern societies must solve. The current approach is the environmental impact of the method considering the volumes that must be treated and the sustainability of the method. Last but not least, energy consumption must be adopted in each and every human activity so as to achieve sustainable development.The European Directives, along with the general notion that wastes are resources, and the effort to reduce the environmental impact in urban environment from waste management, are the driving forces behind waste to energy philosophy. The most sustainable cities in the EU consider that their sustainability is also based on energy recovery from wastes. They all use Waste-to-Energy facilities to treat a significant segment of their waste in order to produce energy in the form of heat and electricity. They do so in a very successful and environmentally friendly way, as they mainly utilise waste fractions that cannot be recycled or reused, and they do not dispose of these resources in landfills. This approach proves that sustainable waste management cannot be achieved without Waste-to-Energy facilities, since a fraction of wastes consists of non-recyclable and non- reusable materials, which provide a significant heating value that cannot be neglected as an energy source. Apart from recycling, Municipal Solid W...","PeriodicalId":186251,"journal":{"name":"TECHNOLOGIES AND MATERIALS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY: TMREES19Gr","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TECHNOLOGIES AND MATERIALS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY: TMREES19Gr","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5138532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The European Directives, along with the general notion that wastes are resources, and the effort to reduce the environmental impact in urban environment from waste management, are the driving forces behind waste to energy philosophy. The most sustainable cities in the EU consider that their sustainability is also based on energy recovery from wastes. They all use Waste-to-Energy facilities to treat a significant segment of their waste in order to produce energy in the form of heat and electricity. They do so in a very successful and environmentally friendly way, as they mainly utilise waste fractions that cannot be recycled or reused, and they do not dispose of these resources in landfills. This approach proves that sustainable waste management cannot be achieved without Waste-to-Energy facilities, since a fraction of wastes consists of non-recyclable and non- reusable materials, which provide a significant heating value that cannot be neglected as an energy source. Apart from recycling, Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) treatment is achieved through various processes that aim towards the conversion of waste into useful forms of energy or easily biodegradable, stabilized products. Dedicated treatment methods for getting different refuse derived products that can be used as fuel for producing energy are available. The aim of this paper is to briefly present these methods, review their processes and reveal where their individual energy costs/losses are derived from. A review and a calculation example for the methods of Recycling, Anaerobic Digestion, Composting, Biodrying and combustion are presented concisely. Finally, these methods are compared in terms of energy costs and recovery. Moreover, the calculation methodology of the energy costs of MSW treatment facility is presented. Energy costs/losses are not a synonym for the efficiency of a MSW treatment method, but are an important factor that must be taken into consideration when designing a MSW treatment facility. Furthermore, different waste mixtures will provide different results for this study but the main conclusion remains unaltered: In terms of energy demand for waste management a percentage of methods are energy consuming and others are energy producing, or lead to significant energy savings, which is key action for a sustainable future. Municipal wastes is one of the greatest problems that the modern societies must solve. The current approach is the environmental impact of the method considering the volumes that must be treated and the sustainability of the method. Last but not least, energy consumption must be adopted in each and every human activity so as to achieve sustainable development.The European Directives, along with the general notion that wastes are resources, and the effort to reduce the environmental impact in urban environment from waste management, are the driving forces behind waste to energy philosophy. The most sustainable cities in the EU consider that their sustainability is also based on energy recovery from wastes. They all use Waste-to-Energy facilities to treat a significant segment of their waste in order to produce energy in the form of heat and electricity. They do so in a very successful and environmentally friendly way, as they mainly utilise waste fractions that cannot be recycled or reused, and they do not dispose of these resources in landfills. This approach proves that sustainable waste management cannot be achieved without Waste-to-Energy facilities, since a fraction of wastes consists of non-recyclable and non- reusable materials, which provide a significant heating value that cannot be neglected as an energy source. Apart from recycling, Municipal Solid W...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价城市固体废物处理设施的能源需求:实现可持续发展的关键途径
欧洲指令,连同废物是资源的一般概念,以及从废物管理中减少城市环境对环境影响的努力,是废物转化为能源理念背后的驱动力。欧盟最具可持续性的城市认为,它们的可持续性也是基于从废物中回收能源。他们都使用废物转化为能源的设施来处理他们的大部分废物,以便以热能和电能的形式产生能源。他们以一种非常成功和环保的方式做到了这一点,因为他们主要利用不能回收或再利用的废物部分,而且他们不会将这些资源弃置在堆填区。这种方法证明,如果没有废物转化为能源的设施,就无法实现可持续的废物管理,因为一小部分废物由不可回收和不可重复使用的材料组成,这些材料提供了重要的热值,作为一种能源不容忽视。除了循环再造外,都市固体废物的处理亦透过不同程序进行,目的是将废物转化为有用的能源或易于生物降解和稳定的产品。有专门的处理方法来获得不同的垃圾衍生产品,这些产品可以用作生产能源的燃料。本文的目的是简要介绍这些方法,回顾其过程,并揭示其个人能源成本/损失的来源。简要介绍了循环利用、厌氧消化、堆肥、生物干燥和燃烧等方法的研究进展和计算实例。最后,对这些方法在能源成本和回收率方面进行了比较。此外,还提出了城市生活垃圾处理设施能源成本的计算方法。能源成本/损失不是都市固体废物处理方法效率的同义词,但在设计都市固体废物处理设施时,却是必须考虑的重要因素。此外,不同的废物混合物将为本研究提供不同的结果,但主要结论保持不变:就废物管理的能源需求而言,一定比例的方法是能源消耗,其他方法是能源生产,或导致显著的能源节约,这是可持续未来的关键行动。城市垃圾是现代社会必须解决的最大问题之一。目前的方法是考虑到必须处理的体积和方法的可持续性,该方法的环境影响。最后但并非最不重要的是,必须在每一项人类活动中采用能源消耗,以实现可持续发展。欧洲指令,连同废物是资源的一般概念,以及从废物管理中减少城市环境对环境影响的努力,是废物转化为能源理念背后的驱动力。欧盟最具可持续性的城市认为,它们的可持续性也是基于从废物中回收能源。他们都使用废物转化为能源的设施来处理他们的大部分废物,以便以热能和电能的形式产生能源。他们以一种非常成功和环保的方式做到了这一点,因为他们主要利用不能回收或再利用的废物部分,而且他们不会将这些资源弃置在堆填区。这种方法证明,如果没有废物转化为能源的设施,就无法实现可持续的废物管理,因为一小部分废物由不可回收和不可重复使用的材料组成,这些材料提供了重要的热值,作为一种能源不容忽视。除了回收外,市政固体垃圾…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Theoretical simulation model of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell Study the effect of nanoic indium oxide (In2O3) on electrical properties of ZnO- based varistor Synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) and its evaluation of antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa biofilm gene’s Comparative analysis regarding burning process for different fuels in hybrid rocket engines Antibacterial activity of chitosan/PAN blend prepared at different ratios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1