Industrial engineering student perceptions of computer science, computer engineering, and electrical engineering

D. Trytten, S. Walden, T. Rhoads
{"title":"Industrial engineering student perceptions of computer science, computer engineering, and electrical engineering","authors":"D. Trytten, S. Walden, T. Rhoads","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2005.1612195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During a NSF funded (HRD-0225228) study of gender parity in the School of Industrial Engineering (IE) at the University of Oklahoma, IE students' responses to questions about courses, experiences with faculty, and computers were noted. Over half of the students (21 out of 41) interviewed commented about Computer Science (CS), Computer Engineering (CE), or Electrical Engineering. Student responses fell into three categories: perceptions of the disciplines (12), perceptions of the departments (7), and perceptions of programming courses (15). IE students perceived these disciplines as intangible, populated by cubicle dwellers, limited, and lucrative. These disciplines need to better communicate their professional context. Perceptions of the departments came mostly from former CE majors who felt unwelcome there. Of the 30 students who had taken the programming course, 4 students enjoyed it and 11 students disliked it. The absence of an accepted pedagogy for beginning programming classes is felt by these students","PeriodicalId":281157,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.1612195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

During a NSF funded (HRD-0225228) study of gender parity in the School of Industrial Engineering (IE) at the University of Oklahoma, IE students' responses to questions about courses, experiences with faculty, and computers were noted. Over half of the students (21 out of 41) interviewed commented about Computer Science (CS), Computer Engineering (CE), or Electrical Engineering. Student responses fell into three categories: perceptions of the disciplines (12), perceptions of the departments (7), and perceptions of programming courses (15). IE students perceived these disciplines as intangible, populated by cubicle dwellers, limited, and lucrative. These disciplines need to better communicate their professional context. Perceptions of the departments came mostly from former CE majors who felt unwelcome there. Of the 30 students who had taken the programming course, 4 students enjoyed it and 11 students disliked it. The absence of an accepted pedagogy for beginning programming classes is felt by these students
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工业工程专业学生对计算机科学、计算机工程和电气工程的认识
在一项由美国国家科学基金会资助(HRD-0225228)的关于俄克拉何马大学工业工程学院(IE)性别平等的研究中,研究人员记录了IE学生对课程、与教师合作经历和计算机等问题的回答。超过一半的受访学生(41人中有21人)评论了计算机科学(CS)、计算机工程(CE)或电气工程。学生的反应分为三类:对学科的看法(12),对院系的看法(7)和对编程课程的看法(15)。工业工程学院的学生认为这些学科是无形的、由小隔间的人组成的、有限的、有利可图的。这些学科需要更好地沟通他们的专业背景。对这些院系的看法主要来自曾主修电子商务的学生,他们觉得在那里不受欢迎。在参加编程课程的30名学生中,4名学生喜欢它,11名学生不喜欢它。这些学生感到,编程入门课程缺乏公认的教学方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work in progress - spiral curriculum approach to reformulate engineering curriculum Work in Progress - A Statics Skills Inventory Using multimedia to support research, education and outreach in an NSF Engineering Research Center Introducing a constructivist approach to applying programming skills in engineering analysis Use of classroom presenter in engineering courses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1