”Is it There or Not?” Why Augmented White Canes Do Not Need to Provide Detailed Feedback about Obstacles

Milo Marsfeldt Skovfoged, A. S. Rasmussen, L. Kalova, L. Daczo, H. Knoche
{"title":"”Is it There or Not?” Why Augmented White Canes Do Not Need to Provide Detailed Feedback about Obstacles","authors":"Milo Marsfeldt Skovfoged, A. S. Rasmussen, L. Kalova, L. Daczo, H. Knoche","doi":"10.1145/3547522.3547685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visually impaired people (VIP) need information about upcoming obstacles to avoid harmful collisions. This initial study explored whether augmented white cane (AWC) users could distinguish between and deemed a higher granularity of information about the elevation height of obstacles useful for travelling. Four VIP evaluated a prototype AWC capable of communicating the vertical location of obstacles at three different granularities: 1) binary, 2) torso or above, 3) knee-, waist- or head-level. VIPs walked towards an obstacle elevated at three different heights a total of 12 times per condition in random order. The VIPs preferred binary feedback and did not want early alerts to upcoming obstacles since they wanted to physically interact with obstacles in order to navigate their environment. This contradicts the conventional AWC designs, which communicate in detail the horizontal distances to obstacles using continuous or high-granular vibration feedback.","PeriodicalId":265029,"journal":{"name":"Adjunct Proceedings of the 2022 Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adjunct Proceedings of the 2022 Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3547522.3547685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Visually impaired people (VIP) need information about upcoming obstacles to avoid harmful collisions. This initial study explored whether augmented white cane (AWC) users could distinguish between and deemed a higher granularity of information about the elevation height of obstacles useful for travelling. Four VIP evaluated a prototype AWC capable of communicating the vertical location of obstacles at three different granularities: 1) binary, 2) torso or above, 3) knee-, waist- or head-level. VIPs walked towards an obstacle elevated at three different heights a total of 12 times per condition in random order. The VIPs preferred binary feedback and did not want early alerts to upcoming obstacles since they wanted to physically interact with obstacles in order to navigate their environment. This contradicts the conventional AWC designs, which communicate in detail the horizontal distances to obstacles using continuous or high-granular vibration feedback.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“它在不在?”为什么增强型白手杖不需要提供障碍物的详细反馈
视障人士(VIP)需要了解即将到来的障碍物,以避免有害的碰撞。这项初步研究探讨了增长型白手杖(AWC)用户是否能够区分并认为对旅行有用的障碍物海拔高度的更高粒度的信息。四名VIP评估了一个原型AWC,该AWC能够以三种不同的粒度传达障碍物的垂直位置:1)二进制,2)躯干或以上,3)膝盖,腰部或头部水平。贵宾们按照随机顺序朝三个不同高度的障碍物走去12次。vip们更喜欢二元反馈,并且不想要即将到来的障碍物的早期警报,因为他们想要与障碍物进行物理互动,以便在他们的环境中导航。这与传统AWC设计相矛盾,传统AWC设计使用连续或高颗粒振动反馈来详细传达与障碍物的水平距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HYCOMOTO Hunting with the Ju/’hoansi in the Kalahari: A co-created VR gesture application Designing Feedback for Haptic and Shape Changing Interfaces with Feelix: A tutorial on the design of force feedback and shape change in custom user interfaces Nebula: Artistic Somaesthetic Appreciation with Biosignals in Virtual Reality aural-visualiser 1000: physical interaction design for materializing moments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1